POLA INTEROGATIF PENYIDIK PADA SAKSI AHLI BAHASA PADA KASUS DELIK ADUAN

Authors

  • Ika Arifianti Universitas Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/jurnalpena.v36i1.1914

Keywords:

Interrogative, police investigator, language expert, complaint offence

Abstract

Legal language can develop in accordance with the confession of the suspect in the Interrogation Report process. The Interrogation Report is a state secret that should not be published to the general public. However, in the interest of this research, the Interrogation Report process is allowed only to the certain extent. The novelty of this research is in the field of data collection which focus on the interrogation of investigators with legal language experts. This study is normative legal research which use normative legal approach and consists of studying legal principles. The data in this study are from police interrogation report 2013 on complaints offence about domestic violence committed by members of the Indonesian police.After analyzing the interrogation result, The results of this research show first, the structure of the discourse of  Interrogation report in the complaint offense case at the Central Java Regional Police with the in the following form: opening section, content section, and closing section, which clarify the structure of the content related to the identity of expert witnesses according to scientific expertise, statements of truthful reporting related to the legal realm, clarity based on information and evidence. Second, qualified investigators are needed. This research can give new contribution in the world of linguistics and police research and a reference for further research in the field of pragmatics, critical pragmatics and  can also be followed up in the field of forensic linguistics. The study of pragmatics and forensic linguistics is a field of applied linguistics that deserves to be researched in the context of efforts to develop linguistic scholarship. This research data can be developed for forensic linguistic research. Forensic linguistics is a new field of science in the field of applied linguistics.

Author Biography

Ika Arifianti, Universitas Pekalongan

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pekalongan

References

Abushihab, I (2015). A Pragmatic Stylistic Framework for Text Analysis.International Journal of Education, 7 (1): 110-118. http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ije/article/viewFile/701.

Bachari, Andika Dutha . (2013). syarat formal dan materiil dalam transaksi berita acara pemeriksaan polisi terhadap pelaku tindak pidana: tinjauan linguistik forensik. Portal Jurnal FPBS, 12. No 2 nov 2013.

Bawengan. (2006). Penyidikan Perkara Pidana dan Teknik Interograsi. Jakarta: Pradnya Pramita.

Bykov. ( 2004). Police Academy Training: An Evaluation Of The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Police Academies. Temis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science, 2 (1): 142-159 http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=themis

Darma, Yoce Aliah. (2009). Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: YRAMA WIDYA.

Groshek, J and Ying Han. (2011). Negotiated Hegemony and Reconstructed Boundaries in Alternative Media Coverage of Globalization. International Journal of Communicatio,. 5: 1523–1544. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/1073/626 .

Josiah, U dan Johnson.( 2012). Pragmatic Analyses of President Goodluck Jonathan’s and President Barack Obama’s Inaugural Addresses. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 (12): 261-278. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_12_Special_Issue_June_2012/32.pdf.

Kansil.( 2007). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

-------- KUHP. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini.

Mey, Jacob. L. (1994). Pragmatics: An Introduktion. Oxford & Cambrige, USA: Black Well.

Nadler, Janice. (2007). Police and Communication.American Bar Foundation; Northwestern University School of law.

Piling, Y. (2013). Forensik dalam Perspektif Budaya Sebuah Tuturan Bagi Semiotik. Jurnal Sosioteknologi. Edisi 29 tahun12. Agustus 2013.

Rahardi, Kunjana.2005. Pragmatik; Jakarta; Erlangga.

Saeidi, S. (2014). Pragmatic Transfer in Iranian EFL Learners as Compared to Native English Speakers in Realization of the Speech Act of Promising. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 1 (1): 252-267.

http://www.ijeionline.com/attachments/article/31/IJEIonline_Vol.1_No.1_pp.252-267_code29.pdf.

Wang, N. (2013). An analysis of the pragmatic functions of “swearing” in interpersonal talk. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 6 (2013): 71-79. https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/589453/Na-Wang.pdf.

Waljinah, Sri.(2012). Bentuk dan Pola Tindak Ujar Bahasa Interograsi dalam Persektif Analisis Linguistik Forensik. Jurnal PIBSI IV, 2012 UNSOED.

Waluyo, Bambang. (2004). Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31