Stuktur Interogatif Penyidik Pada Saksi Ahli Pidana Kasus Delik Aduan Di Polda Jateng
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/jurnalpena.v37i2.2929Keywords:
Interogative Structure of Investigation Report, Investigator, Criminal Expert, Complaint Offense CaseAbstract
Legal language can develop according to the suspect's confession in the BAP process. BAP (The investigation report) is a state secret that may not be published to the general public. However, in the interests of this research, the investigation report process is allowed only to the extent needed. The novelty of this research is in the realm of research data collection, namely interrogative investigators with criminal law experts. The results of the interrogative are studied, so that the results of this research become a new contribution to the world of linguistic and police research. After all, qualified investigators are needed. . Normative legal research consists of research into the principles of law. This normative legal approach is related to legal research which is called legal research. The data in this study are sourced from the BAP of complaints in 2013 in cases of domestic violence committed by members of the National Police. The results of this study explain the discourse structure of the investigation report of criminal experts in the complaint offense case at the Central Java Regional Police with the following findings. (1) opening structure, content structure, and closing, which clarifies the content structure related to the identity of expert witnesses according to their expertise, statements of truth reporting related to the legal domain, clarity based on information and evidence. . This research can be a reference for further research in the field of pragmatics, and critical pragmatics and can be followed up in the field of forensic linguistics. The study of pragmatics and forensic linguistics is an applied linguistic field that deserves to be researched in the context of linguistic scientific development efforts. This research data can be developed for forensic linguistics research. Forensic linguistics is a new field of science in the field of applied linguistics
References
Abushihab, Ibrahim. (2015). A Pragmatic Stylistic Framework for Text Analysis.International Journal of Education. 7 (1): 110-118.
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ije/article/viewFile/701.
Bachari, Andika Dutha . 2013. syarat formal dan materiil dalam transaksi berita acara pemeriksaan polisi terhadap pelaku tindak pidana: tinjauan linguistik forensik. Portal Jurnal FPBS. Vol 12. No 2 nov 2013.
Brow, Penelope dan S.C. Levinson. 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politness Pheomena dalam Ester N.Goody (ed) Question ang Politness. Cambrige University Press. Hal 56-342.
Bykov, Olga.( 2004). Police Academy Training: An Evaluation Of The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Police Academies. Temis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science. 2 (1): 142-159 http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=themis
Darma, Yoce Aliah. 2009. Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: YRAMA WIDYA.
Groshek, Jacob and Ying Han. (2011). Negotiated Hegemony and Reconstructed Boundaries in Alternative Media Coverage of Globalization. International Journal of Communication. 5: 1523–1544. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/1073/626 .
Josiah, Ubong E dan Sifonde Effiong Johnson.( 2012). Pragmatic Analyses of President Goodluck Jonathan’s and President Barack Obama’s Inaugural Addresses. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 (12): 261-278.
http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_12_Special_Issue_June_2012/32.pdf.
Kansil. 2007. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
KUHP. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini.
Nadler, Janice.2007. Police and Communication.American Bar Foundation; Northwestern University School of law.
Piling, Yasdraf Amir. 2013. Forensik dalam Perspektif Budaya Sebuah Tuturan Bagi Semiotik. Jurnal Sosioteknologi. Edisi 29 tahun12.
Agustus 2013.Supriadi. 2008. Etika dan Tanggung jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rahardi, Kunjana.2005. Pragmatik; Jakarta; Erlangga.
Saeidi, Sayyid Nasser. (2014). Pragmatic Transfer in Iranian EFL Learners as Compared to Native English Speakers in Realization of the Speech Act of Promising. International Journal of Educational Investigations. 1 (1): 252-267.
http://www.ijeionline.com/attachments/article/31/IJEIonline_Vol.1_No.1_pp.252-267_code29.pdf.
Velez, FredyRivera. (2014). Web 2.0 and National Security Strategies: Similarities Between and Perspectives on Spain and Ecuador. The Cases of #15M and #30S. American International Journal of Social Science. 3 (2): 180-190.
http://english.kalkinma.com.tr/userfiles/pagefiles/annualreports/annual_report_2014.pdf(Diakses pada tanggal 7Maret 2016)
Wang, Na. (2013). An analysis of the pragmatic functions of “swearing” in interpersonal talk. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication 6 (2013): 71-79. https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/589453/Na-Wang.pdf.
Waljinah, Sri.2012. Bentuk dan Pola Tindak Ujar Bahasa Interograsi dalam Persektif Analisis Linguistik Forensik. PIBSI IV Tahun 2012 UNSOED.
Waluyo, Bambang. 2004. Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Hak publikasi jurnal menjadi milik pengelola jurnal dengan sepengetahuan penulis, sedangkan hak moral publikasi menjadi milik penulis.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap aksesibilitas publikasi jurnal mengacu pada lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonCommercial-No Derivative (CC BY-NC-ND), yangberarti bahwa publikasi dapat dimanfaatkan dengan tujuan non-komersial dan dalam bentuk aslinya (tidak dapat dimodifikasi).
- Setiap publikasi jurnal (cetak/elektronik) bersifat open access untuk tujuan pendidikan, penelitian, dan perpustakaan. Di luar tujuan tersebut, pengelola jurnal tidak bertanggung jawab atas pelanggaran hak cipta yang dilakukan oleh pihak tertentu.