IMPLIKATUR KONVENSIONAL DAN NON KONVENSIONAL TUTURAN PENGUNJUNG KAWASAN LAWANG SEWU SEMARANG JAWA TENGAH

Authors

  • Ika Arifianti Universitas Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/jurnalpena.v32i1.936

Keywords:

Pragmatik, Implikatur Konvensional, Non Konvensional

Abstract

The speech of visitors of the Lawang Sewu Semarang  is very interesting to study, because the average Lawang Sewu visitors come from outside of Semarang with diverse languages and social and educational backgrounds.  The way they deliver utterances is very diverse.  The use of implicature in language does not mean that it is not intentional or does not have a specific function. The use of implicature in language has considerations such as to refine speech, maintain ethics of politeness, to insinuate subtly (indirectly), and to avoid offending directly.  In implicative speech, the speaker and the interlocutor must have the same concept in a context.  There are conventional implicative forms of speech by visitors of Lawang Sewu area.  Conventional implications are the meanings of utterances that are conventionally or generally accepted by the public.  The approach used in this study is twofold, namely the theoretical research approach of nonconventional implications as expressions that imply something different from the actual and methodological esearch approach. The theoretical approach is used to test pragmatic analysis as the study.  The methodological research approach used is descriptive-qualitative method.

Author Biography

Ika Arifianti, Universitas Pekalongan

Program Studi Bahasa dan Satra Indonesia Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pekalongan

References

Black, Elizabeth. 2011. Stilistika Pragmatis. Terjemahan Ardianto. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cumings, Louise.2007. Pragmatik Sebuah Perspektif Multidisipliner. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar.

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation dalam Cole, Dater dan S. Morgen (ed). Pragmatik: A. Reader. New York:Oxford University Press.

Gunarwan, Asim. 1994. Pragmatik Teori dan Kajian Nusantara. Jakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Haugh, Michael. 2002. The Intuitive Basis Of Implicature Relevance Theoretic Implicitness Versus Gricean Implying. International Pragmatics Association. Vol 12:2 (2002): 117-134.

http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/elanguage/pragmatics/article/download/317/317-602-1-PB.pdf. (Diakses pada tanggal 17 Februari 2016).

Moleong, Lexy J. 2013. Metode Penelitian Bahasa Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mulyana. 2005. Kajian Wacana Teori, Metode dan Aplikasi Prinsip- prinsip Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta; Tiara Wacana.

Lubis. 2011. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Rahardi, Kunjana.2005. Pragmatik; Jakarta; Erlangga.

Rohmadi, Muhammad. 2010. Pragmatik Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta; Yuma Pustaka.

Rustono. 1999. Pokok-Pokok Pragmatik. CV. IKIP Semarang Press.

Wijana. 1996. Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: ANDI OFFSET.

Yule, George. 2006. Pragmatik. Terjemahan Indah Fajar Wahyuni.Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Zamzani.2007. Kajian Sosiopragatik.Yogyakarta: Cipta Pustaka.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-27