Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Realistik ditinjau dari Aktivitas Belajar Siswa pada Materi Segiempat

Authors

  • Dewi Azizah Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v1i1.462

Keywords:

Realistic Mathematics Education, quadrilateral, learning activity

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to describe the differences between Realistic Mathematics Education and Mechanistic learning approach in mathematics achievement viewed from students’ activity. The research was a quasi experimental. The population of the research was all the seventh grade students of junior high school in Pekalongan regency. The instruments used to collect the data were achievment on quadrilateral topic and questionnare of the students activity in learning mathematics. To analyze the data, the researcher used anova (analysis of variances) with unbalanced cells. It was concluded that Realistic Mathematics Education gave a better result than Mechanistic learning approach on quadrilateral topic and the students mathematics achievement for the students that high activity was better than those who had a moderate and low activity, whereas the students mathematics achievement that had a moderate activity was equivalence to the students who had a low activity.

References

Ahmad Rohani. 2004. Pengelolaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

André Heck. 2003. “How a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach andMicrocomputer-Based Laboratory Worked in Lessons on Graphingat an Indonesian Junior High School”. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, Vol. 26, No 2, pp. 1-51.

Budiyono. 2004. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Surakarta : UNS Press.

Devrim ¨UZEL”. 2006. “Attitudes of 7th Class Students Toward Mathematics in Realistic Mathematics Education”. Journal of Education Research, Vol. 1,

pp. 1951-1959.

Gonzales, Patrics. 2008. Highlights From TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context . National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. (http://nces.ed.go/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009001)

Hayley Barnes. 2004. Realistic mathematics education: Eliciting alternative mathematical conceptions of learners. African Journal of Research in SMT Education, Volume 8(1), pp. 53-64.

I Gusti Putu Suharta. 2001. “Penerapan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik untuk Mengembangkan Pengertian Siswa.”, disajikan pada Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Realistik di Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta tanggal 14- 15 November 2001.

Noraini Idris. 2009. “Enhancing Students’ Understanding In Calculus Trough Writing”. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Volume 4, Number 1. 36-55. Salman, Medinat F. 2009. “ Active Learning Techniques (ALT) In A Mathematics Workshop”. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Volume 4, Number 1. 24-35.

Sardiman, A.M. 2001. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yaniawati. 2006. Mengajar (Menyenangi) Matematika.(Online). http://www.pikiran_rakyat.com/cetak/2006. (diakses pada 2 September 2009).

Downloads

Published

2017-08-14