Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Langkah Penyelesaian Berdasarkan Polya dan Krulik-Rudnick Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v1i1.464Keywords:
problem-based learning model, the Polya-based solution steps, the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps, the students’ creativitiesAbstract
The objectives of this research are to investigate: (1) whether or not the problem-based learning model with the Polya-based solution steps results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than that with the Krulik Rudnickbased solution steps; (2) whether or not the students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the medium creativity and whether or not the students with the medium creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with low creativity; (3) which of the students with the high creativity, those with the medium creativity, and those with the low creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics when the problem-based learning model with the Polya-based solution steps is given; (4) which of the students with the high creativity, those with the medium creativity, and those with the low creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics when the problem-based learning model with the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps is given; (5) which of the problem-based learning models each with the Polya-based solution steps and with the Krulik Rudnick solution steps results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics for the students with the high creativity; (6) which of the problem-based learning models each with the Polya-based solution steps and with the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics for the students with the medium creativity; (7) which of the problem-based learning models each with the Polya-based solution steps and with the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics for the students with the low creativity. This research used the quasi-experiment research with the factorial design of 2 x 3. The population of the research was the 4th-grade students of State Primary Schools in Bojong Sub-district, Tegal regency in the academic year of 2010/2011, which were 31 in the number of schools. The sampling was conducted by using the technique of stratified cluster random sampling. The samples in this research consisted of 212 respondents. The data were gathered through the instruments of learning achievement test in Mathematics and questionnaire on the students’ creativity level. Prior to their use for gathering data, those instruments were tested. The validation of the test and questionnaire instruments was conducted by a competent person in validation, the reliability of the test was verified by using the KR-20 formula and the reliability of the questionnaire was verified by using the Alpha formula. In the prerequisite test on Analysis of Variance the Lilliefors test was used to verify the normality test while the Barlett test was used to verify the homogeneity test. With (α) = 0.05 the samples were obtained out of the population with normal and homogeneous distribution. The results of this research are as follows: (1) that the problem-based learning model with the Polya-based solution steps results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics that that with the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps; (2) that there is no difference in the learning achievement in Mathematics among the students with the high, medium, and low creativities; (3) that the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high creativity is equal to either that of those with the medium creativity or that of those with the low creativity when the problem-based learning model with the Polya-based solution steps is given; (4) that the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high creativity is equal to either that of those with the medium creativity or that of those with the low creativity when the problem-based learning model with the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps is given; (5) that the use of problem-based learning model with the Polyabased solution steps results in an equally good learning achievement in Mathematics to the use of that with the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps among the students with the high creativity; (6) that the use of problem-based learning model with the Polya-based solution steps results in an equally good learning achievement in Mathematics to the use of that with the Krulik- Rudnick based solution steps among the students with the medium creativity; (7) that the use of problem-based learning model with the Polya-based solution steps results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the use of that with the Krulik Rudnick-based solution steps.
References
Agus Suprijono. 2010. Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Arends I. Richard. 2008. Learning To Teach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bell, F. H. 1981. Teaching and Learning Mathematics: in Secondary School. (2nd ed.). Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company.
Budiyono. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: UNS Press
________. 2009. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Depdiknas.1989. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Depdiknas. 2003. Pengajaran Berdasarkan Masalah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Didin Abdul Muiz Lidnillah. 2008. Strategi Pemecahan Masalah di Sekolah Dasar.Makalah.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 1999. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
E.Nurhayati. 2004. Belajar Aktif Matematika untuk SD dan MI Kelas 4. Jakarta: Bintang Ilmu.
Herman Hudoyo. 1979. Pengembangan Kurikulum Matematika dan Pelaksanaannya Di Depan Kelas. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Jamin C. 2007. A Problem with Problem Solving: Teaching Thingking Without Teaching Knowledge. The Mathematic Educator, 17(2),7-14. Kazerunian, K. 2007. Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education : A Study of instructors and Students Perceptions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 761-768.
Kemple, Kristen and Nissenberg, Shari.2000. Nurturing Creativity in Early Childhood Education: Families Are Part of It. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28(1), 67-71.
Lee, H. and Bae, S. 2006. Issues in implementing a Structured Problem Based learning Srategy in a Volcano Unit : A Case Study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(22), 655-676.
Moh.Uzer Usman. 2006. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyono Abdurrahman. 2009. Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar.Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Nyimas Aisyah. 2007. Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Saifudin Azwar. 2007. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Septa Krisdiyanto. 2010. Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Masalah melalui Metode Proyek dan Metode Inkuiri Ditinjau dari Kreativitas dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa. UNS: Tesis.
Saiful Sagala. 2006. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: RinekaCipta.
Subiyanti Yayuk. 2004. Penggunaan Langkah Polya Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Cerita. Surakarta.
Suliman, Fauziyah. 2004. Problem-Based Learning : A Study of the Web-Bsed Syncronous Collaboration. Malaysian Online Journal of instructional Tecnology (MOJIT), 1(2), 58-66.
Torrance, E.P dan Khatena, J. 1976. Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory.Chicago: Stoeltin Company.
Utami Munandar. 2009. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat . Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Winarno. 2006. Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah terhadap kemampuan mengoperasikan Microsoft excel ditinjau dari motivasi belajar mahasiswa. UNS: Tesis
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

















