KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIKA DAN SELF-EFFICACY SISWA SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v8i1.945Keywords:
self-efficacy, mathematical reasoningAbstract
This study is a survey research using quantitative approach. The subject in this study was eighth grade students with 132 students. Data in this study were collected using two instruments, namely mathematics reasoning ability tests and self-efficacy questionnaires. Analysis of the data in this study was divided into two parts, namely descriptive analysis and inferential analysis. Descriptive analysis described of mathematical reasoning ability and self-efficacy. Inferential analysis used Pearson product moment correlation test to find relationship between self-efficacy and mathematical reasoning ability. The results of the study showed that the students' self-efficacy was in high category and the strength aspect was the dimension of self-efficacy with the highest score. In mathematical reasoning ability, the ability of students to give correct and complete evidence of solutions has the highest score. The result of correlation test showed that there was relationship between self-efficacy and mathematical reasoning ability with a positive relationshipReferences
Aprisal, A., & Abadi, A. M. (2018a). Improving student’s mathematical reasoning and self-efficacy through Missouri mathematics project and problem solving. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 11(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v11i2.206
Aprisal, A., & Abadi, A. M. (2018b). Mathematical communication ability of students viewed from self-efficacy. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (pp. 726–732). Retrieved from http://science.conference.upi.edu/proceeding/index.php/ICMScE/article/view/20
Bandura, A. (2009). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectation to the selection of science-based collage mayors. Journal of Vocational Bhaviour, 23(3), 329–345.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
Conner, A. M., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Fransisco, R. T. (2014). Identifying kind of reasoning in collective argumentation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 163(3), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.921131
Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI No 22 Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi.
Dinther, M. Van, Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ selfefficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
John, P., & Mst, B. O. (2016). Logical Reasoning Abilities of Junior High School Students in the Province of Cotabato , Philippines, 4(4), 18–21.
Kitsantas, A., Cheema, J., & Ware, H. W. (2011). Mathematics achievement: the role of homework and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 310–339.
Lau, C., Kitsantas, A., Miller, A. D., & Rodgers, E. B. D. (2018). Perceived responsivity for learning, self-efficacy, and sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A study international baccalaureate primary years programs students. Social Psychology Education, 21(3), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018- 9431-4
Lim, K., Kim, O. K., Cordero, F., Buendia, G., & Kasmer, L. (2015). The use of prediction in mathematics classroom. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267804444_THE_USE_OF_PREDICTION_IN_MATHE%0AMATICS_CLASSROOMS
Maarif, S. (2016). Improving Junior High School Students ’ Mathematical Analogical Ability Using Discovery Learning Method Improving Junior High School Students ’ Mathematical Analogical Ability U sing.
Malpass, J., O’neil, H. F., & Hocevar, D. (2010). Self-regulation, goal orientation, self-efficacy, worry, and high-stakes math achievment for mathematically gifted high school student. Roper Review, 21(4), 281–288.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Hoy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMMS 2011 international result in mathematics. Chestnutt Hill, MA: TIMsS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston Collage.
NCTM. (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Noer, S. H. (2013). Self-efficacy mahasiswa terhadap matematika.
Phan, H. P. (2012). Relation between informational sources, self-efficacy and academic achievement: a development approach. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 32(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.625612
Sanhadi, K. C. D. (2015). Pengaruh kemampuan penalaran dan self-efficacy terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa Kelas VIII. In SEMINAR NASIONAL MATEMATIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNY 2015 (pp. 341–350).
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology (5th ed). New York: McGraw Hill Companies.
Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. . (2006). Self-efficacy development in adolescence. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescencents (pp. 71–96). Information Age Publishing.
Taat, Muhammad, S., Rozario, & Gladys, D. (2014). The influence of academic attitude and self-efficacy towards students’ achievement in private higher learning institution. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 3(6), 41–50.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

















