The Role Of The State In Conducting Civil Suits In The Results Of Corruption Controlled By The Heirs Of The Perpetrators Of Corruption

Ariman Sitompul

doi:10.31941/pj.v23i3.3922

Authors

Ariman Sitompul Magister of Law, Universitas Dharmawangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.3922

Abstract

Corruption is a very serious problem because it harms the country's finances. By therefore, several measures are needed to restore the financial losses of the state by make money payments in lieu of loss of state assets. This study aims to determine responsibility of heirs in the return of state assets from corruption committed by parents who have died and analyze the mechanism of payment of replacement money return of state assets resulting from corruption. This study uses normative research with a legal approach. The analysis showed that the responsibility of heirs in return of state assets, depending on the evidence of court decisions and mechanisms regarding replacement money in the return of state assets in accordance with the amount of property convicted of corruption. In other words, the mechanism substitute money for the return of state assets from the proceeds of corruption in Law Number 31 Year 1999 Jo Law No. 20 Of 2001 On The Eradication Of Corruption explain corruption convicts are obliged to pay the amount of replacement money according to the results of the corruption by convict. Conclusion that the state financial losses caused by corruption convicts who have the deceased is transferred to his heirs according to the evidence in the court decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Marbun & Mahfud MD, Pokok-Poko Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarata: Liberty, 2006 Hlm. 112

Michael Julnius Christhopher Siahaya, ‘Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tahap Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Lex Crimen, 4.2 (2015).

Muhammad Yusuf, Merampas Aset Koruptor (Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia) (Jakarta: PT Kompas Media Nusantara, 2013).

Oka Mahendra, Kerjasama Bantuan Timbal Balik Dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil KorupsiSinergi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Jakarta, Selasa 4 April 2006 p. 9.

Pasal 32 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999

Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999

Pasal 34 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999

Pasal 38 Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999

Saldi Isra, ‘Asset Recovery Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Kerjasama Internasional’, Makalah. Disampaikan Dalam Lokakarya Tentang Kerjasama Internasional Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi, Diselenggarakan Atas Kerjasama Fakultas Hukum Universias Diponegoro Dan Kanwil Depkumham Prov. Jawa Tengah, Tanggal, 22 (2008)

Subekti, Hukum Pembuktian Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1991, p. 7

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Edisi Ke Enam Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2002, p. 127.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Pembendaharaan Negara

Muhammad Yunus Syam, Andi Marlina, Suhartina, Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Ahli Waris, Delictum, Vol.1, No. 1, 2022, p. 7

Putu Aditya Witanaya Putra dkk, Tanggung Jawab Ahli Waris Dalam Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Terpidana Yang Meninggal Dunia, Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2, No.1, 2021, p. 127-130

https://gagasanhukum.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/prinsip-pengembalian-aset-hasil-korupsi-bagian-ii/ diakses tanggal 6 Januari 2023