LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION CRIMES REGARDING ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND LANNY JAYA REGENCY REGIONAL ASSETS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v21i2.4578Abstract
This research aims to determine and analyze the implementation of accountability investigations at the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency of Lanny Jaya Regency and to determine and analyze the factors that hinder the accountability investigation process at the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency of Lanny Jaya Regency. In this research, the methods used are normative juridical research methods and empirical juridical research methods, supported by data collection techniques in the form of direct observation and interviews in the field so that valid and accountable data is obtained. The research results show that the process of investigating alleged criminal acts of corruption in the regional financial and asset management agency of Lanny Jaya Regency by the Papua Prosecutor's Office was carried out using several methods. One way is through judicial intelligence operations carried out by the Prosecutor's Intelligence team. In the investigation process, the Prosecutor's Office uses case development techniques by utilizing whistle blowers (internal informants) and justice collaborators (justice collaborators) to collect case data and facts. Apart from that, the Prosecutor's Office also applies investigative audit techniques as a method of searching and collecting data, information and other findings to ensure the truth or even reveal errors in facts. In investigative efforts, the Prosecutor's Office also coordinates with the Financial Audit Agency (BPK) or the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) to ensure the completeness and correctness of information related to corruption cases. Several obstacles faced by the Investigating Prosecutor in carrying out investigations into criminal acts of corruption in the regional financial and asset management agency of Lanny Jaya district. These obstacles include limited human resources, funding/budget sources, facilities and infrastructure, as well as access to areas which affect the smoothness and support of the investigation process.Downloads
References
Buku:
Abdul Latief Huum, 2011, Administrasi Dalam Praktik Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Prenada Media Grub, Jakarta.
Chaeruddin, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Aditama, Jakarta, 2017
Fitriadi, B. 2019. Analisis Yuridis Peran Kejaksaan Negeri Bengkalis Dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pengembalian Keuangan Negara Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Terdakwa. Tesis. Islam Riau.
Kaligis,O.C., Praktik Tebang Pilih Perkara Korupsi Jilid I, Bandung: Almuni, Cetakan Pertama, 2008.
R. Wiyono, Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006.
Utami, T. B. 2007, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana. Diponegoro. Bandung.
Artikel Jurnal:
Kurniawan, R. C. (2018). Sistem Pengaturan Kewenangan Penyidikan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 12(3), 2. http://Www.Jurnalptik.Id/Index.Php/Jik/Article/View/69
Satria Ferry, “Eksistensi Kejaksaan Tinggi Aceh Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 19, No. 3, Agustus, 2017.
Syamsudin, M. Faktor-Faktor Sosiolegal yang Menentukan dalam Penanganan Perkara Korupsi di Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 17 No.3 Juli 2010. Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Samsul Tamher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













