Application for Bankruptcy Declaration or Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation for Developers Viewed from the Principles of Balance and Justice

Authors

  • Fedhli Faisal Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.4857

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the implications of bankruptcy petition or postponement of debt payment obligations on developers in Indonesia, considering legal principles, particularly the principles of balance and justice within the framework of the Bankruptcy and Debt Payment Obligation Postponement Act (UU Kepailitan & PKPU). The background of this study encompasses the importance of legal certainty for consumers and developers in the context of fair and efficient financial settlements.  The research methodology employs a legal document analysis approach, involving literature review and case interpretation to evaluate the application of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Act on developers, and to analyze the impact of Supreme Court Regulation No. 03/2023 on court interpretations in relevant cases. The findings indicate that the Bankruptcy and PKPU Act provides a crucial legal framework to protect the interests of consumers and developers, but its application must carefully consider legal principles, particularly in proving facts or circumstances influencing decisions on bankruptcy or PKPU petitions. The implications of these findings underscore the need for courts to maintain a balance between creditors' rights and protection for debtors experiencing financial difficulties. Proposed recommendations include the necessity for clarity in legal interpretations, consistent implementation of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Act, and an approach favoring justice in every bankruptcy or PKPU petition decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fedhli Faisal, Universitas Pamulang

Dosen, Peneliti, Kurator, dan Pengacara

References

Andani, D. e. (2021). Prinsip Pembuktian Sederhana dalam Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. JH Ius Quia Iustum, 28(3), 635-656. doi:https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art9

Aprita, S. (2016). Penerapan Asas Keseimbangan dalam Hukum Kepailitan Pada Putusan Pengadilan Niaga. Makasar: Pena Indis.

Astomo, P. (2018). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 123-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.31436

Fitria, A. (2018). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Debitor Mencegah Kepailitan. Lex Jurnalica, 15(1), 18-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v15i1.2291

Hakim, R. (2023). Muhammad Evan Kurnia, Membangun Negara Hukum Pancasila Yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat. JRP: Jurnal Relasi Publik, 1(2), 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.59581/jrp-widyakarya.v1i2.280

Lontoh, R. A. (2001). Penyelesaian Utang-Piutang Melalui Kepailitan Atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Alumni.

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum (14th Edition). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, Divisi Kencana.

Möller, K. (2012). Proportionality: Challenging the critics. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(3), 709-731.

Mubaroq, M. A. (2023). Rekonseptualisasi Materi Hukum Kepailitan Untuk Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitor Berbasis Asas Keseimbangan. Yogyakarta: Magister Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Nyaman, R. S. (2023). Prosedur Hukum Permohonan Pailit dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), 5(2), 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v5i2

Rokilah. (2020). Dinamika Negara Hukum Indonesia: Antara Rechtsstaat dan Rule of Law. NURANI HUKUM: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM, 2(1), 12-22. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v2i1.8167

Santoso, R. A. (2023). Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 1(4), 7-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1392

Saputra, I. E. (2020). Kedudukan Hukum Kreditor Preferen Pajak dan Kreditor Preferen Buruh dalam Proses Kepailitan. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(2), 155-166. doi:https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i2.44

Silalahi, U. e. (2020). Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Atas Hak Jaminan dalam Proses Kepailitan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(1), 35-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.35-47

Simanjuntak, J. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Atas Kewenangan Kreditor Mengajukan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Honeste Vivere Journal, 33(1), 69-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i1.193

Sjadeni, S. R. (2009). Memahami Undang-Undang No. 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan, 3rd Edition. Jakarta: Grafiti.

Yuhelson. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24