Legal Consequences of the Transfer of Liability Clause in Foreign Exchange Trading Transactions

Authors

  • Eliya Nova Lubis Universitas Muhammadyah Sumatera Utara
  • Surya Perdana Universitas Muhammadyah Sumatera Utara
  • Farid Wajdi Universitas Muhammadyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.4887

Abstract

This paper aims to see the legal consequences of the clause of transfer of responsibility in foreign exchange transactions. Doing a foreign exchange trading business is not an easy matter, it requires special expertise in reading world market conditions. Every actor must have the ability to read foreign exchange charts, accurately and precisely. Understanding world market sentiment can make the right decision to buy and exchange foreign currency. Legal issues arise, in essence, to be able to transact in the field of foreign exchange in this case forex margin trading, customers must go through a futures brokerage company. The company is engaged in the field of forex market commodities. There is a transfer of responsibility to consumers made at the beginning of the agreement by the brokerage company which ends up having to bear all losses in the future. The writing method used in this paper is descriptive, collecting data from literature studies. Based on the results of the analysis, consumers who experience losses are less protected by the regulations that govern them. The concept of this transfer of responsibility is contrary to the principles of freedom of contract, legal protection and justice for investors in foreign exchange trading transactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Surya Perdana, Universitas Muhammadyah Sumatera Utara

Universitas Muhammadyah Sumatera Utara

Farid Wajdi, Universitas Muhammadyah Sumatera Utara

Universitas Muhammadyah Sumatera Utara

References

Agarwal, S., Faircloth, S., Liu, C., & Ghon Rhee, S. (2009). Why do foreign investors underperform domestic investors in trading activities? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2008.04.001

Anisah, S., & Rakhmawati, C. S. (2017). Klausula Pembatasan dan Pengalihan Tanggung Jawab Pialang Berjangka dalam Kontrak Baku Pemberian Amanat secara Elektronik On-Line. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss1.art7

Arifin, M. (2020). MEMBANGUN KONSEP IDEAL PENERAPAN ASAS IKTIKAD BAIK DALAM HUKUM PERJANJIAN. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2119

Auboin, M., & Ruta, M. (2013). The relationship between exchange rates and international trade: a literature review. World Trade Review, 12(3), 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745613000025

Biondi, G. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Kesepakatan Melalui Surat Elektronik (E-mail) Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia. Premise Law Journal, 19, 1–20. https://www.neliti.com/publications/164959/analisis-yuridis-keabsahan-kesepakatan-melalui-surat-elektronik-e-mail-berdasark

Birt, J., Rankin, M., & Song, C. L. (2013). Derivatives use and financial instrument disclosure in the extractives industry. Accounting & Finance, 53(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12001

Brown, G. W. (2001). Managing foreign exchange risk with derivatives. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2–3), 401–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00049-6

Cahyadi, A. D. (2019). Yurisdiksi Transaksi Elektronik Internasional Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i1.203

Chaboud, A., Rime, D., & Sushko, V. (2023). The foreign exchange market. In Research Handbook of Financial Markets (pp. 253–275). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375321.00020

Clark, E., & Judge, A. (2009). Foreign Currency Derivatives versus Foreign Currency Debt and the Hedging Premium. European Financial Management, 15(3), 606–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00431.x

Clements, K. W., & Fry, R. (2008). Commodity currencies and currency commodities. Resources Policy, 33(2), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.10.004

Czinkota, M. R., & Ronkainen, I. A. (2005). A forecast of globalization, international business and trade: report from a Delphi study. Journal of World Business, 40(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.02.006

Dierdorff, E. C., & Rubin, R. S. (2022). Revisiting Reciprocity: How Accountability, Proactivity, and Interpersonal Skills Shape Obligations to Reciprocate Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09743-6

Dinwoodie, J., & Morris, J. (2003). Tanker forward freight agreements: the future for freight futures? Maritime Policy & Management, 30(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000051621

Dvořák, T. (2005). Do Domestic Investors Have an Information Advantage? Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 817–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00747.x

Eggers, D. (2009). Liberty and Contractual Obligation in Hobbes. Hobbes Studies, 22(1), 70–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/187502509X415256

Ellitan, L. (2020). Competing in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v10i1.657

Fazriah, D. (2023). TANGGUNG JAWAB ATAS TERJADINYA WANPRESTASI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH DEBITUR PADA SAAT PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 1(02 SE-Articles). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/304

Hakim, J. (2019). EXONERATION CLAUSE ON LAW OF CONSUMER PROTECTION: EFFECTS AND LEGAL EFFORTS. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 8(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.2.2019.297-314

Irtyshcheva, I., Kramarenko, I., Shults, S., Boiko, Y., Blishchuk, K., Hryshyna, N., Popadynets, N., Dubynska, І., Ishchenko, O., & Krapyvina, D. (2020). Building favorable investment climate for economic development. Accounting, 773–780. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.006

Khwaja, A., & Mian, A. (2005). Unchecked intermediaries: Price manipulation in an emerging stock market. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(1), 203–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.014

King, M. R., Osler, C., & Rime, D. (2012). Foreign Exchange Market Structure, Players, and Evolution. In Handbook of Exchange Rates (pp. 1–44). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445785.ch1

Klitgaard, T., & Weir, L. (2004). Exchange Rate Changes and Net Positions of Speculators in the Futures Market. Economic Policy, May, 17–28.

Mackor, A. R. (2012). Legal Doctrine As a Non-Normative Discipline. Law and Method, 2(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.5553/ReM/221225082012002001003

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855

Rahmat, D. (2020). PENYULUHAN HUKUM DI DESA SAMPORA TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KORBAN PELECEHAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DI INDONESIA. Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(01). https://doi.org/10.25134/empowerment.v3i01.2684

Rawls, J. (1991). Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical. In Equality and Liberty (pp. 145–173). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21763-2_10

Saravistha, D. B., Putra, I. B. W., Sarjana, I. M., & Salain, M. S. P. D. (2023). Digital Trading Forex: Global Trends And Local Impact. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 14(3), 3025–3031. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.03.378

Silalahi, R. (2019). KEKUATAN HUKUM JUAL BELI TANAH MELALUI SEORANG KUASA. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 1(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v1i2.230

Sinaga, N. A. (2023). Peranan Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Perjanjian. Binamulia Hukum, 7(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i2.318

Smits, J. M., & Smits, J. M. (2017). Rethinking Legal Scholarship. In R. van Gestel, H.-W. Micklitz, & E. L. Rubin (Eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906

Sulaiman, E. (2022). PROBLEMATIKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Ash-Shahabah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1 SE-Articles), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.59638/ash.v2i1.49

Susilo, A. B. (2011). PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HERMENEUTIKA HUKUM: SUATU ALTERNATIF SOLUSI TERHADAP PROBLEMATIKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Perspektif, 16(4), 214. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v16i4.84

Tambun, M. A., & Putuhena, M. I. (2022). Tata Kelola Pembentukan Regulasi Terkait Perdagangan Mata Uang Kripto (Cryptocurrency) sebagai Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset). Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v1i1.8314

Tambunan, T. (2009). Export‐oriented small and medium industry clusters in Indonesia. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 3(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200910943661

Tiodor, P. C., Tjahyani, M., & Asmaniar. (2023). Pembuktian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang Piutang Secara Lisan. Krisna Law : Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Krisnadwipayana, 5(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.37893/krisnalaw.v5i1.208

Treitel, G. (2021). The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and the Law of Carriage of Goods by Sea. In Lex Mercatoria (pp. 345–379). Informa Law from Routledge.

Uyun, A. F. B., & Iskandar, H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investasi Kripto Pada Aplikasi Tokocrypto. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4188–4196. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1193

van Gestel, R., & Micklitz, H. (2014). Why Methods Matter in E uropean Legal Scholarship. European Law Journal, 20(3), 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12049

Downloads

Published

2024-06-18