Legal Analysis Of The Implementation Of The Construction Service Work Agreement Between The Public Works Department And Cv. Sutra Bumi

Authors

  • Masayu Robianti Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.5140

Keywords:

Legal protection, Geographical Indications, Robusta Coffee, West Lampung, Economic Boost

Abstract

The case of default committed by CV. Sutra Bumi against the Public Works Agency of Lampung Barat Regency in the procurement of goods and services in the form of the construction of the Way Ngison - Phiton road which was carried out in 2023 based on the Work Agreement (Contract) Number: 600/013 / KTR / PB.7 / III.03 / III / 2003 dated July 28, 2023, which was only sued in 2024. The purpose of this study is to determine how the implementation of the road construction contract agreement between the Public Works Agency of Lampung Barat Regency and CV. Sutra Bumi and what are the obstacles and efforts in completing the road construction. The research method used in the study is the normative legal approach method and empirical legal. The data used are secondary data and primary data. Then the data is analyzed using qualitative legal analysis. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the implementation of the contract agreement is stated in the construction work agreement made by the service user and service provider, so that this agreement does not cause any problems related to the progress of the construction work that has been carried out. The implementation of the contract has been in accordance with the contents of the contract where the contract period. Constraints and efforts in completing the road work are not in accordance with the agreement that has been made: a) Due to the unavailability of materials causing delays in previously scheduled work. b) Waiting for materials that often occurs will cause a major impact, especially for large-scale projects that use a lot of labor, especially on the Hotmix Road project. c) In addition, other factors that cause waiting times for material procurement where the budget needed for asphalt material procurement is very large, while in the field the need for the budget is not met.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arsyad, Jawade Hafidz & Dian Karisma. (2022). Sentralisasi Birokrasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Juliawan, I Putu Eka. (2020). Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Pengaturan Barang Dan Jasa, Jurnal Kertha Wicara, Vol.9 No.9.

Kurniawan, Nyoman Samuel. (2013). Konsep Wanprestasi Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Dan Konsep Utang Dalam Hukum Kepailitan (Studi Komparatif Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Dan Kepailitan), Universitas Udayana.

Pambayun, Aga Yurista. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Dalam Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Di Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman, Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Sari, Berlian Harina; Achmad Busro; Suradi. (2019). Pemutusan Kontrak Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Antara Dinas Bina Marga Kab. Grobogan Dengan Cv. Abdi Manunggal Sakti. Diponegoro Law Journal Volume 8, Nomor 2.

Sinaga, Niru Anita. (2019). Implementasi Hak Dan Kewajiban Para Pihak Dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara–Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma, Volume 10 No. 1.

Subekti, R. dan R. Tjitrosudibio. (2012) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BurgerlijkWetboek). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Subekti, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Penerbit PT. Intermasa, Jakarta, 2003,

Sutrisno. (2003). Peningkatan Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Raja Pustaka.

Simamora, Y. Sogar. (2017). Hukum Kontrak: Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.

Sibuea, Hotma P. (2010). Asas Negara Hukum, Peraturan Kebijakan, dan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Satrio J., (1993). Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Pada Umumnya. Bandung: Alumni

Sudarsono. (2007). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Simanjuntak, P.N.H. (2009). Pokok- Pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Satrio J., (2012). Wanprestasi Menurut KUHPerdata, Doktrin, dan Yurispridensi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Yahman. (2016). Cara Mudah Memahami Wanprestasi dan Penipuan Dalam Hubungan Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Yahman. (2013). Analisis Ke-ekonomian Tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30