Corporate Mining Offences: Assessing The Interpretation of Ultimum Remedium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5169Abstract
The principle of ultimum remedium in criminal law is more accurately referred to as a moral principle for legislators (legislative ethics) so that they can think about whether or not an act needs to be criminalized, including the threat of criminal sanctions. Normatively, in Indonesian criminal law the principle of ultimum remedium is strictly regulated in Article 100 and the general explanation of point 5 of the PPLH Law. In the Minerba Law, the principle of ultimum remedium is not normative. In decision Number 46/Pid.B/LH/2021/PT Kdi, it is implied that a corporate crime occurred by the defendant PT Bososi Pratama. The panel of judges acquitted the defendant PT Bososi Pratama by interpreting the principle of ultimum remedium. This interpretation emerged because the position of criminal sanctions in the Mineral and Coal Law is still unclear, whether as ultimum remedium or primum remedium.
Downloads
References
Buku
Aileen Kavanagh dan John Oberdiek (Ed), 2009, Arguing About Law, Routledge, London and New York.
Amanda Pinto & Martin Evans, 2003, Corporate Criminal Liability, Sweet and Maxwell, London.
Andrew Ashworth dan Jeremy Horder, 2013, Principle of Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, London.
Douglas Husak, 2008, Overcriminalization: The Limit of The Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, New York.
George P. Fletcher, 1998, Basic Concept of Criminal Law, Oxfordf University Press, New York.
Hariman Satria, 2020, Corporate Criminal Law: Doctrine, Norms and Praxis, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Henry N. Pontel & Gilbert Geis, International Handbook of White Collar and Corporate Crime, Springer, New York
Jan Remmelink, 2003, Criminal Law: Comments on the Most Important Articles of the Dutch Criminal Code and Their Equivalents in the Indonesian Criminal Code, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
John Braithwaite, 1994, Corporate Crime in The Pharmaceutical Industry, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Larry J. Siegel, 2018, Criminology: Theories, Paterns, and Typologies, Cengage Learning, Boston.
Machteld Boot, 2001, Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, Intersentia, Antwerpen-Oxford-New York.
Marjono Reksodiputro, 2020, Integrated Criminal Justice System, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Michael Jefferson, 2013, Criminal Law, Pearson, Eidenburgh.
Moeljatno, 2008, Principles of Criminal Law, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Muladi, 2004, Conditional Sentence Institution, Alumni, Bandung.
Richard D. Hartley, 2008, Corporate Crime, A B C Clio, Santa Barbara-California.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2009, Law Making an Introduction, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Topo Santoso, 2020, Criminal Law An Introduction, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
van Bemmelen, 1987, Criminal Law 1, Binacipta, Jakarta.
William Wilson, 2011, Criminal Law: Doctrin and Theory, Pearson Longman, New York.
Jurnal
Douglas Husak, The Criminal Las as Last Resort, “Oxford Jurnal of Legal Studies”, Volume 24 No. 2, 2004, 207-235.
Faisal, Mardani Gazali, Mahmud Umar, dan Muh. Mufti M Djafar, Perempuan Sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual: Apakah Hukum Sudah Cukup Memberikan Keadilan, “Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan”, Vol 53 No. 1, 2023, p. 1-11.
Nils Jareborg, Criminalization as Las Resort (Ultima Ratio), “Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law” Vol. 2, No. 2, 2005, 521-534.
Topo Santoso dan Hariman Satria, Sexual-violence offenses in Indonesia: Analysis on the Criminal Policy in the Law Number 12 of 2022, “Padjajaran Law Journal,” Vol 10 No. 1, 2023, 59-79.
Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara
Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ida Ayu Sridiah Lestari, Hariman Satria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
