The Application Of System Based Models Victim Offender Mediation Towards Recovery Of State Financial Losses Due To Corruption In Indonesia

Authors

  • Victor Antonius Saragih Sidabutar Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Febrian Febrian Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Nashriana Nashriana Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Ruben Achmad Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5192

Abstract

In some cases, corruption has the potential to develop into money laundering, which will complicate the performance of law enforcement officers to track suspicious financial transactions and save assets suspected of belonging to the state. In response to this problem, the replacement money payment system is carried out by law enforcement officers. However, based on the results of the investigation, the implementation of replacement money payments for the recovery of state financial losses is considered ineffective and inefficient at the application and execution stages. Therefore, a legal breakthrough is needed in the form of the use of penal mediation as an effort to maximize state financial recovery. The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of recovering state financial losses due to corruption in Indonesia and the application of the victim offender mediation system based models to recovering state financial losses due to corruption in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the alternative nature contained in the construction of Article 18 of Law. No. 31 of 1999 has the potential to result in efforts to recover state financial losses being less than optimal and effective, this is due to the tendency of perpetrators to avoid responsibility for paying replacement money. The application of SBM VOM to recovering state financial losses can be done by accommodating the concept of PB in positive law in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research using 3 approaches, namely the statutory approach (Statute Approach), the conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach) and the comparative approach (Comparative Approach).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, M. F. (2016). Prosecution of Money Laundering of Proceeds of Corruption By Anti-Corruption Commission (Kpk). Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 28(2), 322. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16732

Bourcier, B. (2019). RESCUING POLITICS FROM LYING AND HYPOCRISY: UTILITY AND TRUTH IN JEREMY BENTHAM’S THOUGHT. Ethics, Politics & Society, 2(1), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.2.1.90

Christianto, H. (2020). Norma Persatuan Sebagai Batasan Perbuatan Pidana Penyebaran Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Internet. Veritas et Justitia, 6(1), 94–126. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3501

Disantara, F. P. (2021a). Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat dalam Paradoks Etika dan Hukum. JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal), 22(2), 205–229.

Disantara, F. P. (2021b). The Joint Ministerial Decree (SKB) of Islamic Defenders Front (FPI): Quo Vadis The Rule of Law and Human Rights? Musamus Law Review, 3(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.35724/mularev.v3i2.3572

Disantara, F. P., Naftali, S. A., Putra, R. Y. A., Irmayati, D., & Rahmawati, G. (2022). Enigma Pemberantasan Korupsi di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 5(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4135

Flora, H. S. (2022). Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code in Indonesia: A Prophetic Legal Study. Rechtsidee, 11. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.836

Hamilton, M. (2020). THE MEANING AND SCOPE OF ‘ASSEMBLY’ IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(3), 521–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000160

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2019). United Nations Convention Against Corruption dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 31(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.43968

Kamilah, A. (2021). Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Pemanfaatan Aset Negara Melalui Model Build Operate and Transfer/Bot. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(3), 603. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2757

Kurniawan, I. G. A., & Lulo, L. D. D. M. (2023). Legal Protection Orientation And Formulation For Traditional Musical Instruments As Patents: An Inclusive Legal Paradigm. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 23(2), 325. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.2.3629

Lippman, M. (2022). Contemporary Criminal Law: Concepts, Cases, and Controversies (Sixth). SAGE Publications.

Muladi. (1995). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ningrat, A. A. S. I. R. A. P., & Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2023). Digital Business Problems and Regulations in an Integrative Legal Perspective. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 7(2), 141–156.

Palmer, M., & Roberts, S. (2020). Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-making. Cambridge University Press.

Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, H. H. (2022). Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum? Konstitusi, 19(2), 272.

S. Vitvitskiy, S., N. Kurakin, O., S. Pokataev, P., M. Skriabin, O., & B. Sanakoiev, D. (2021). Formation of a new paradigm of anti-money laundering: The experience of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.30

Simarmata, L. N. (2021). Korupsi Sekarang Dan Yang Akan Datang. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 11(2), 87–99.

Wiranti, Y., & Arifin, R. (2020). Tantangan dan Permasalahan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Kosmik Hukum, 20(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v20i1.3822

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Victor Antonius Saragih Sidabutar, Febrian Febrian, Nashriana Nashriana, Ruben Achmad

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.