Strategy for Empowering Village-Owned Enterprises through Parson's Social System Approach

Authors

  • Isis Ikhwansyah Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Etty Mulyati Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Tri Utomo Wiganarto Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5251

Abstract

This research examines Talcott Parsons' Structural Functionalist method to empowering Village-Owned Enterprises. BUMDes' economic and social dynamics are understood using this method. The Parsonian social framework's adaption factors, goal attainment, integration, and delay are studied. This normative, philosophical, and analytical research examines social and legal theories to characterize BUMDes' role in village development. The descriptive analytical research technique reviews BUMDes-related legislation, regulations, and practical practices. Qualitative data analysis yields extensive Parsons' theory application results. The research found that BUMDes promotes inclusive and sustainable village development. BUMDes adapts its economic approach to the village's possibilities, such as agricultural or tourist development. BUMDes may boost village revenue by fostering productive companies, achieving objectives by improving community welfare. The integration component emphasizes village institution-community engagement for social stability. Latency involves BUMDes' attempts to conserve local culture to retain village identity throughout development. However, financing and institutional coordination concerns are typically major barriers. This research found that Parson's strategy may help BUMDes improve Indonesian communities' economic and social growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelmonem, Mohamed Gamal, and Gehan Selim. ‘Architecture, Memory and Historical Continuity in Old Cairo: The Journal of Architecture: Vol 17, No 2’ 17, no. 2 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2012.678634.

Amoah, Solomon Kofi, and Anthony Ayim. ‘The Theoretical Approaches of Durkheim, Parsons and Luhmann: Intra-Traditional Differences, Interdependencies and Contradictions’. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education 5, no. 3 (2018).

Barton, John, Merrelyn Emery, Robert Louis Flood, John W. Selsky, and Eric Wolstenholme. ‘A Maturing of Systems Thinking? Evidence from Three Perspectives’. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17, no. 1 (2004): 3–36.

Caragliu, Andrea, Chiara F. Del Bo, Karima Kourtit, and Peter Nijkamp. ‘The Winner Takes It All: Forward-Looking Cities and Urban Innovation’. The Annals of Regional Science 56, no. 3 (1 May 2016): 617–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0734-5.

Cowan, Brian. ‘Intellectual, Social and Cultural History: Ideas in Context’. In Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History, edited by Richard Whatmore and Brian Young, 171–88. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300_10.

Deijfen, Maria, and Remco van der Hofstad. ‘The Winner Takes It All’. The Annals of Applied Probability 26, no. 4 (August 2016): 2419–53. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-AAP1151.

Faedlulloh, Dodi. ‘BUMDes dan Kepemilikan Warga: Membangun Skema Organisasi Partisipatoris’. Journal of Governance 3, no. 1 (14 June 2018). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v3i1.3035.

Holmström, Susanne. ‘Niklas Luhmann: Contingency, Risk, Trust and Reflection’. Public Relations Review, Special Issue on Social Theory, 33, no. 3 (1 September 2007): 255–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.003.

Ishaq, H. Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Penulisan Skripsi. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2017.

Izadi, Arezoo, Mahmoud Mohammadi, Shahriayar Nasekhian, and Soraya Memar. ‘Structural Functionalism, Social Sustainability and the Historic Environment: A Role for Theory in Urban Regeneration’. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 11, no. 2–3 (2 July 2020): 158–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2020.1723248.

Kay, Alan. ‘Social Capital, the Social Economy and Community Development’. Community Development Journal 41, no. 2 (2006): 160–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi045.

Kushner, Howard I., and Claire E. Sterk. ‘The Limits of Social Capital: Durkheim, Suicide, and Social Cohesion’. American Journal of Public Health 95, no. 7 (July 2005): 1139–43. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.053314.

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.

Minott, Sandra. ‘Validation of Parsons’ Structural Functionalism Theory Within a Multicultural Human’. Dissertation Doctor of Philosophy, Walden University, 2016.

Nadriana, Lenny, and Idham Idham. ‘KONTRUKSI HUKUM BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUMDes) SEBAGAI BENTUK KETAHANAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19’. Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 1, no. 01 (24 January 2022): 30–41. https://doi.org/10.24967/jaeap.v1i01.1495.

Owens, B. Robert. ‘Producing Parsons’ Reputation: Early Critiques of Talcott Parsons’ Social Theory and the Making of a Caricature’. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 46, no. 2 (2010): 165–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20424.

Peters, Karin, Birgit Elands, and Arjen Buijs. ‘Social Interactions in Urban Parks: Stimulating Social Cohesion?’ Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Special section on ‘Forest recreation and nature tourism’, 9, no. 2 (1 January 2010): 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003.

Potts, Ruth, Karen Vella, Allan Dale, and Neil Sipe. ‘Exploring the Usefulness of Structural–Functional Approaches to Analyse Governance of Planning Systems’. Planning Theory 15, no. 2 (1 May 2016): 162–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214553519.

Ritzer, George, and Jeffrey Stepnisky. Modern Sociological Theory. New York: SAGE Publications, 2021.

Robertson, Roland, and Bryan S. Turner. ‘Talcott Parsons and Modern Social Theory — An Appreciation’. Theory, Culture & Society 6, no. 4 (1 November 1989): 539–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327689006004002.

Rydin, Yvonne. ‘Using Actor–Network Theory to Understand Planning Practice: Exploring Relationships between Actants in Regulating Low-Carbon Commercial Development’. Planning Theory 12, no. 1 (2013): 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212455494.

Shahraki, Hassan. ‘Three-Dimensional Paradigm of Rural Prosperity: A Feast of Rural Embodiment, Post-Neoliberalism, and Sustainability’. World 3, no. 1 (March 2022): 146–61. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3010008.

Sudarno. ‘Perencanaan Tataruang Dalam Mendukung Pembangunan Pertanian Perdesaan’. Jurnal Penelitian Geografi 33, no. 1 (2018).

Downloads

Published

2024-06-18