Restorative Justice and State Responsibility for the Return of Rights of Victims Due to Fraud in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.5398Abstract
The rise of fraudulent practices that end up in criminal acts and cause material losses to victims, for example the First Travel and Abu Tours cases in Indonesia, which have captured massive public attention, has shifted the orientation of punishment in criminal law, especially in property crimes from Lex Talionis towards Restitutio ad Integrum which emphasises restoration to the original state. This paper will analyse how the responsibility of the state and how the restorative justice approach in addressing the problem of fraud in Indonesia. The research method uses a normative legal research model with secondary data as analytical material. The results show that restitution and compensation instruments are an option in restoring victims of property crime. Restitution is the responsibility of the perpetrator to restore the victim, while compensation is the responsibility of the state as part of the state's role in realising the welfare of the people. Restorative justice as a means of resolving property crimes, especially fraud, offers an alternative that is oriented towards effective legal remedies to provide adequate legal protection for victims, although in practice there are still some fundamental changes.Downloads
References
Aertsen, Ivo. “Recalibrating Victimhood through Restorative Justice: Perspectives from Europe.” Restorative Justice 5, no. 3 (2017): 352–67. doi:10.1080/20504721.2017.1390997.
Azisa, Nur. “Kompensasi Dan Restitusi Bagi Korban Kejahatan Sebagai Implementasi Prinsip Keadilan.” Universitas Hasanuddin, 2015. http://repository.unhas.ac.id/23585/4/B013171012_disertasi_07-11-2022 1-2.pdf.
Bix, B. H. “Radbruch’s Formula and Conceptual Analysis.” The American Journal of Jurisprudence 56, no. 1 (2011): 45–57. doi:10.1093/ajj/56.1.45.
Braithwaite, John. “The Conversation, the Journal, Not the Book.” The International Journal of Restorative Justice 3, no. 1 (2020): 106–21. doi:10.5553/tijrj/258908912020003001012.
Cipto, Hendra. “Tipu 86.720 Jemaah Umrah, Bos Abu Tours Divonis 20 Tahun Penjara.” KOMPAS.Com, 2019. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2019/01/28/20425601/tipu-86720-jemaah-umrah-bos-abu-tours-divonis-20-tahun-penjara?page=all.
DA, Ady Thea. “Wamenkumham: Restoratif Justice Tidak Membuat Penegakan Pidana Menjadi Permisif.” Hukumonline.Com. A, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/wamenkumham--restoratif-justice-tidak-membuat-penegakan-pidana-menjadi-permisif-lt6360d61718ff8/.
Efendi, J, and J Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Effendi, Erdianto. Hukum (Pidana) Adat (Gagasan Pluralisme Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Penerapan Hukum Menurut Keyakinan Hukum). Refika Aditama, 2018.
———. “Penjatuhan Pidana Ganti Rugi Sebagai Pidana Pokok Dalam Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 618. doi:10.26623/julr.v5i2.5355.
Fachri, Ferinda K. “Telan Puluhan Ribu Korban, Masih Ingat Kasus Penipuan Berkedok Umrah First Travel?” Hukum Online, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/telan-puluhan-ribu-korban--masih-ingat-kasus-penipuan-berkedok-umrah-first-travel-lt661387daf37c4/?page=1.
Friedman, Lawrence M. Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Khozim. Cet. Ke-4. Bandung: Nusa Media. Vol. 110. Nusa Media, 2011.
Heather Leawoods. “‘Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher.’” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 2, no. 1 (2000): 493.
Irawan, Chandra Noviardy. “Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Berdasarkan Restorative Justice.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 4, no. 2 (2021): 672. doi:10.26623/julr.v4i2.4283.
Leonard, Tommy. “Pembaharuan Sanksi Pidana Berdasarkan Falsafah Pancasila Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Diindonesia.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2016). doi:10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8764.
Lubis, Fauziah. Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Pidana. CV Manhaji. Jakarta: CV. Manhaji Medan, 2020.
Muhammad, Faiz Emery, and Beniharmoni Harefa. “Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penipuan Phisning Berbasis Web.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 226. doi:10.26623/julr.v6i1.6649.
Nanda Thalia Prayogi, and Edi Setiadi. “Restorative Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan Pada Kasus Investasi Bodong Dihubungkan Dengan Peraturan Polri Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 Tentang Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies 4, no. 1 (2024): 43–52. doi:10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9756.
Poplawsky, Jacquelyn P. Learning to Heal : The Impact of a Restorative Justice Program on Crime Victims. San Antonio: University of The Incarnate Word, The Athenaeum, 2017. https://athenaeum.uiw.edu/uiw_etds/317/.
Ramdlany, Ahmad Agus. “Restorative Justice in Islamic Legal Philosophy Perspective.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 24, no. 2 (2021): 109–17. http://152.118.58.226.
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice Revised Edition. Amerika Serikat: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Schuttler, O De. International Human Rights Law. London: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Setiyawan, Wahyu Beny Mukti, and Hadi Mahmud. “Menggagas Model Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Marital Rape Dalam Membentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Perempuan Yang Sesuai Dengan Norma Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 3, no. 1 (2018): 68. doi:10.26623/jic.v3i1.864.
Sunarmi, Marlina, Olma Fridoki, Alvi Syahrin,. “PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DAN PENGGELAPAN DI POLRESTABES MEDAN (The Implementation of Restorative Justice in The Settlement of Criminal Crimes of Fraud and Embezzlement at the Polrestabes Medan).” Res Nullius Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2022): 42–56. doi:10.34010/rnlj.v4i1.4679.
Veviati, Isna, Jawa Timur, Adhitya Widya Kartika, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Pembangunan. “Restorative Justice Pada Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya 11, no. 9 (2023): 2061–74. doi:10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i09.p05.
Walsh, A, and C Hemmens. Law, Justice, and Society A Sosiolegal Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Wibawa, Iskandar. “Pidana Kerja Sosial Dan Restitusi Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Penjara Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 2 (2017): 24. doi:10.18196/jmh.2017.0086.105-114.
Zehr, Howard, and Ali Gohar. The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Pennsylvania. Vol. 01. New York: Good Books, 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amriyanto Amriyanto, Tri Syafari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
