The Justice in International Law: A Study from the Perspective of Immanuel Kant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5617Keywords:
Justice, International Law, Immanuel Kant, Freedom, Human RightsAbstract
This article examines the concept of justice in international law through the perspective of Immanuel Kant, highlighting the application of universal moral principles and the categorical imperative in relations between states. Kant argued that justice should be understood as a principle that applies to all human beings without exception, requiring states to act in a manner that promotes individual freedom without harming the freedom of others. In the context of international law, this includes respect for human rights, the responsibility of states to other states, and the formation of a federation of states that work together to achieve global peace and justice. The article also discusses the relevance of Kant's thinking in the modern international legal system, where international institutions such as the United Nations, the International Court of Justice, and the International Criminal Court play a role in upholding the principles of justice and peace. Thus, Kant's theory makes an important contribution to the formation of an international law that is just, inclusive, and based on a universal morality that respects human freedom and rights
Downloads
References
Das, K. (2021). The Paradigm of Justice: A Contemporary Debate between John Rawls And Martya Sen. Routledge.
de Búrca, G. (2018). Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(4), 1347–1352. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy106
Dugis, V. (2016). Teori Hubungan Internasional Perspektif-Perspektif Klasik. Cakra Studi Global Strategis (CSGS).
Emmanuel Kelechilwuagwu. (2019). Kant’s Absolute Good Will And Its Implications For Some Current Ethical Issues Like Suicide, War And Abortion. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 7(8), 03–14.
Etuvoata, A. E. (2020). Towards Improved Compliance with Human Rights Decisions in the African Human Rights System: Enhancing the Role of Civil Society. Human Rights Review, 21(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00603-z
Ferrara, A. (2022). Moral Duties and Juridical Duties: The Ambiguity of Legal Ethics Considered Through the Prism of Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. German Law Journal, 23(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.5
Hestevold, H. S. (1985). Justice to Mercy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 46(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107357
Insole, C. J. (2020). Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law. Oxford University Press.
Krisch, N. (2022). Jurisdiction Unbound: (Extra)territorial Regulation as Global Governance. European Journal of International Law, 33(2), 481–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chac028
Lawry-White, M. (2024). Inter-State Human Rights Disputes. International Human Rights Law Review, 13(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-13010002
Lee, B. D. (2018). The Moral Law as a Fact of Reason and Correctness Conditions for the Moral Law. Dialogue, 57(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000622
Mubangizi, J. C. (2020). A Human Rights Based Approach to Fighting Corruption in Uganda and South Africa: Shared Perspectives and Comparative Lessons. Law, Democracy and Development, 24, 225–247. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2020/ldd.v24.10
Radziewicz, P. (2022). Judicial Change to the Lawin-Action of Constitutional Review of Statutes in Poland. Utrecht Law Review, 18(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.689
Rato, D., Setyawan, F., & Nurmansyah, F. (2023). Pengaruh Teori Kant dalam Pengembangan Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum Universal. CLEAR: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 1(2), 33–46.
Sweet, K. (2024). Kant on Free Speech: Criticism, Enlightenment, and the Exercise of Judgement in the Public Sphere. Kantian Review, 29(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136941542300047X
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anita Yuliastini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













