Legal review of the protection of business actors in bankruptcy cases (Decision No. 28 / Rev.Sus-bankruptcy/2017 / PN Jkt.Pst)": Legal review of the protection of business actors in bankruptcy cases (Decision No. 28 / Rev.Sus-bankruptcy/2017 / PN Jkt.Pst)"

Aisyah Aisyah; Dedi Yusuf Kristian Gultom; Felim yenson

doi:10.31941/pj.v24i1.5767

Authors

Aisyah Aisyah Universitas Prima Indonesia
Dedi Yusuf Kristian Gultom Universitas Prima Indonesia
Felim yenson Universitas Prima Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.5767

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Bankruptcy, Commercial Court

Abstract

This study discusses related to consumer protection when business actors are based on the Commercial Court decision decision Number No.28 / Rev.Sus-bankruptcy/2017/PN Pn.Jkt.Pst is caused by not being able to meet its debt obligations in accordance with the terms of bankruptcy under Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning bankruptcy and postponement of debt repayment obligations. The purpose of this study to determine the legal remedies that consumers can do and the liability of the company manager if the company is declared bankrupt due to errors or omissions. This research method uses the type of Normative research by using the method of statutory approach (statue approach), in which researchers examine further from the side of the applicable legislation. The method of data collection used is a literature study, analyzing the legal material obtained, which is in accordance with the problem and the purpose of the study. The results showed that bankruptcy brings significant consequences for the debtor, especially in terms of loss of control over its assets and the transfer of responsibility to the curator. This shows the importance of the curator's role in maintaining the value of the bankrupt's assets and protecting the interests of all related parties. We are of the opinion that there is a need for increased understanding and socialization of the rights and obligations of debtors and bankruptcy procedures so that business actors can be better prepared to face difficult situations. In addition, the government needs to consider policies that are more supportive of post-bankruptcy business recovery, so that business actors have the opportunity to bounce back and contribute to the national economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisnaini Yuliana Pratiwi" Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Atas Kasus Developer Pailit,” Nucl. Phys. 13, no. 1 (2023): h7

Andika Wira Kesuma, “Pentingnya Perlindungan Hukum Pelaku Usaha Melalui Yayasan Perlindungan Hukum Pelaku Usaha Indonesia,” Sol Justicia 5, no. 2 (2023): 166–75, https://doi.org/10.54816/sj.v5i2.567.

Ani Purwanti Dan Marzellina Hardiyanti, Strategi Penyelesaian Tindak Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Perempuan Dan Anak Melalui Ruu Kekerasan Seksual, Masalah - Masalah Hukum, Jilid 47 No. 2, April 2018

Erna Fitriatun, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR Kepailitan Debitur (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Makasar,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53, no. 9 (2019): 1689–99.

F Yudhi Priyo Amboro, “Pengaturan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Amerika Serikat Dan Inggris,” Lex Prudentium Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2023): 62–81, https://doi.org/10.61619/lexprudentium.v1i2.6.

Fitriatun, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR Kepailitan Debitur (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Makasar.”

Gelar Sidang Santoso, Yudhia Ismail, and Dwi Budiarti, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Keadaan Insolvensi Debitur,” Yurijaya Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 4, no. September (2022): 161–73.

Hak-hak Konsumen Dalam and Pasal Undang-undang Nomor, “Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Volume I, Nomor 1 Agustus 2018 M. Kholil” I, no. 1 (2018): 53–60.

Hanifah Nur Ramadhanti, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Ditinjau Dari Minimum Utang Terhadap Perusahaan Solven,” Institutional Repository UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2023, https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/73467.

Kepailitan dan Akibat Kepailitan Terhadap Kewenangan Debitur Pailit Dalam Bidang Hukum Kekayaan 16 Oktober 2020 Rifqani Nur Fauziah Hanif diakses melalui

Munawir El Azis Mahmud Paweroi, “Skripsi Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Atas Aset Debitor Pailit Yang Berada Di Luar Negeri,” 2023.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2011).

Philips Dillah Suratman, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015).

Retno Damayanti et al., “Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Asas Keberlangsungan Usaha Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Untuk Mencegah Pailit,” Jurnal Restorative Justice 7, no. 2 (2023): 128–43, https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v7i2.5596.

Sianipar, M. R. B., Sahputra, R., & Sitompul, A. (2024). Obstacles Faced by The Curator, As Well As The Efforts Made by The Curator In Conducting Actio Pauliana Against Bankruptcy Assets. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 3(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i4.1418

Soerjono Dan Sri Mamudji Soekanto, Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003).

Sonya Liani Ramadayanti, “Position of Tax Debt and Labour Right: Legal Review,” Journal La Sociale 1, no. 4 (2020): 1–8, https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v1i4.131.

Stardo R. L. Mait, Wulanmas A.P.G. Frederik, and Dani R. Pinasang, “Urgensi Penormaan Prinsip Commercial Exit From Financial Distress Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan Indonesia,” INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 5 (2023): 11284–98.

Sutrisno Sutrisno, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Atas Sertifikat Tanah Kavling Dalam Hal Pengembang Telah Dinyatakan Pailit,” Jurnal Rechtens 8, no. 1 (2019): 107–20, https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v8i1.491.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (UU Kepailitan)

Legal review of the protection of business actors in bankruptcy cases (Decision No. 28 / Rev.Sus-bankruptcy/2017 / PN Jkt.Pst)"