Analysis of Law Enforcement Through the Establishment of Jampidmil in Handling Military Judicial Connectivity Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.5814Keywords:
Law Enforcement, JAMPIDMIL, Connectivity Cases, Military JusticeAbstract
The formation of JAMPIDMIL itself is expected to have firm steps in law enforcement, especially in the scope of prosecution coordination carried out in Handling cases on connectivity. This study aims to determine the existence of the Deputy Attorney General for Military Crimes in handling connectivity cases and to determine the legal consequences of the position of the Attorney General in handling connectivity cases based on Article 35 Paragraph (1) letter g of Law Number 11 of 2021. The theory used as an analytical tool in this study is the theory of authority and the theory of law enforcement. The research method used is normative legal research with the approach used being the statutory approach. The results of the study show that 1) the existence of the Deputy Attorney General for Military Crimes in handling connectivity cases forms an impetus in implementing the accountability of each institution without emphasizing the obligations of one over the other. 2) The legal consequences of the Attorney General's position in handling connectivity cases based on Article 35 Paragraph (1) letter g of Law Number 11 of 2021 delegates the authority to prosecute to the Public Prosecutor in the scope of general courts and the Auditor in the scope of military courts. In practice, resolving connectivity cases often poses challenges if carried out separately, which can lead to dualism in prosecution policies and disparities in sentencing.
Downloads
References
Ateng Syafrudin, “Menuju Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara yang Bersih dan Bertanggungjawab”, Jurnal Pro Justisia Edisi IV, Universitas Parahyangan, Bandung, 2000.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.
Dellyana,Shant. Konsep Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1988.
Faisal, S. M. Peradilan Militer di Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju. 2004.
Indrohato, Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, dalam Paulus Efendie Lotulung, Himpunan Makalah Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang baik, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994.
Kelaesar Anna Hasanah Lapae, Hambali Thalib & Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng, Kewenangan Jaksa Agung Muda Bidang Pidana Militer Dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Koneksitas”, Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), Vol.3, No. 9, September, 2022.
Mardjono Reksodipuro, Kriminologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kumpulan Karangan Buku Kedua, Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum Lembaga Kriminologi Universitas Indonesia, 1997.
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta: Bina Aksara. 1987.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan kedua Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 38 Tahun 2010 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Putu Nadya Prabandari, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha dan I Made Minggu Widyantara. “Peranan Jaksa Agung Muda Bagian Pidana Militer dalam Penanganan Perkara Koneksitas.” Jurnal Universitas Warmadewa, hlm. 183.
Soerjono Soekanto. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegeakan Hukum Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
SR Sianturi, Hukum Pidana Militer di Indonesia. Jakarta: Alumni AHM-PTHM, 1985.
Stout HD, de Betekenissen van de wet, dalam Irfan Fachruddin, Pengawasan Peradilan Administrasi terhadap Tindakan Pemerintah, Bandung: Alumni, 2004.
Tubagus Ronny Rahman Nitibaskara, Paradoksal Konflik dan Otonomi Daerah, Sketsa Bayang-Bayang Konflik dalam Prospek Masa Depan Otonomi Daerah, Jakarta: Sinar Mulia, 2002.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Undang-undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Disiplin Militer.
Waluyo, B. Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 mohammad jouhar robby
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
