The Inaccuracy of the General Election Organizers in Determining the Pair Yusak Yaluwo and Yakob Waremba as Candidates for Regent and Deputy Regent of Boven Digoel Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.5979Keywords:
Inaccuracy, General Election Organizers, Determination of the Pair Yusak Yaluwo and Yakob Waremba, Candidates for Regent and Deputy Regent, Boven Digoel Regency.Abstract
This study aims to identify the requirements set by law for regional head candidate pairs and the problems related to the determination of Yusak Yaluwo and Yakob Waremba in the election of the regent and vice regent of Boven Digoel Regency. This method is known as normative juridical. In this legal research, law is defined either as a statute that is stipulated or as a rule or norm that is a standard of human behavior that is considered appropriate. Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents, and Mayors into Law in the Regulation of the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia stipulates the requirements that must be met by regional head candidate pairs in the regional head election. In addition, the problem related to the determination of Yusak Yaluwo and Yakob Weremba as candidates for regent and vice regent of Boven Digoel Regency is related to the trial of Violation of the Code of Ethics of Election Organizers against the Boven Digoel Regency KPU, Boven Digoel Regency Bawaslu, and members of the Papua Province KPU. In addition, the Lawsuit for Dispute over the Results of the Boven Digoel Regent and Vice Regent Election has been decided by the Constitutional Court to disqualify Candidate Pair Number 4 (four) on behalf of Yusak Yaluwo and Yakob Weremba.
Downloads
References
Bagir Manan dan Kuntana Magnar . (1996). Mewujudkan Kedaulatan Rakyat melalui Pemilu dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia dalam konteks Demokrasi Pancasila, Gaya Media Pratama, Jakarta.
Bagir Manan. (1999). Lembaga Kepresidenan, Pusat Studi Hukum Islam Indonesia dan Gama Media, Yogyakarta.
Bondan Guanawa. (2000). Apa itu Demokrasi, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.
Haedar Natshir. (1999). Gagasan dan Gelombang Baru Demokrasi, Pustaka Pelajar, Jakarta.
I Made Aryan Utama. (2007). Hukum Lingkungan, Sistem Hukum Perizinan Berwawasan Lingkungan Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Pustaka Sutra, Bandung.
Ismail Suny. (2007). Pergeseran Kekuasaan Eksekutif, Aksara Baru, Jakarta.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, BIP Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2010). Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Koentjoro Poerbopranoto. (1987). Sistem Pemerintahan Demokrasi, Eresco, Bandung.
Leonardo Morlino, What is a Good Democracy, Theory and Empirical Analysis, Paper disampaikan pada the Conference on the European Union, Nation State and the Quality of Democracy, Lessons from Soutthern Europe, Universityof California, Berkeley, 2002.
Philipus M. Hadjon. (1992). Lembaga tertinggi Negara dan Lembaga-lembaga Tinggi Negara Menurut UUD 1945, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya.
Saleh Adiwinata. (1983), Boerhanoedin St. Batoeh., Kamus Istilah Belanda_Indonesia, Fockeme Andreal Belanda, Binacipta, Jakarta.
Sumali. (2003). Reduksi Kekuasaan Eksekutif Dibidang Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perpu), Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang.
Ridwan H R, (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Putusan Sidang Perkara Kode Etik Nomor 140-PKE-DKPP/IX/2020
Putusan Sidang Perkara Kode Etik Nomor 146-PKE-DKPP/IX/2020
Putusan Sidang Perkara Kode Etik Nomor Nomor 162-PKE-DKPP/XI/2
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NOMOR 132/PHP.BUP-XIX/2021
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marudut Hasugian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
