A Civil Law Perspective on the Music Copyright Dispute: Agnez Mo vs. Ari Bias

Authors

  • Ayni Suwarni Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia
  • Ema Farida Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6148

Keywords:

Copyright, Music Royalties, Copyright Dispute, Civil Law, Contracts.

Abstract

Copyright disputes in the music industry often arise due to unclear mechanisms for royalty payments. The case of Ari Bias vs. Agnez Mo, regarding the unauthorized use of the song "Bilang Saja" in a concert, sparked legal debate over royalty payment responsibilities. The Central Jakarta Commercial Court's ruling, which held Agnez Mo accountable, raised questions about civil law interpretations in copyright protection. This study uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach, examining Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014, collective management organization (LMK) regulations, and music industry contracts. The findings reveal that unclear royalty payment responsibilities, lack of transparency by LMKs, and weak legal awareness within the music industry are major causes of disputes. Furthermore, music contracts often fail to clearly define royalty obligations, creating legal loopholes. This study concludes that clearer regulations on royalty responsibilities in concerts, improved LMK transparency, and legal education for musicians and songwriters are essential. With stronger policy reforms, similar disputes can be reduced, and the copyright and royalty protection system in Indonesia can operate more effectively and fairly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Mahdouri, A. (2024). Ambiguity and Uncertainty Surrounding Public Policy and Confidentiality in the Context of Arbitration Intellectual Property Disputes (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)).

Ayu Palar, M. R., Rafianti, L., Puspitasari, W., & Novianti, I. (2025). Centralized management of copyright royalties: A case study on the National Collective Management Organization for songs and music in Indonesia. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 28(1), 24-57.

Azwar, T. K. D., Desiandri, Y. S., Arifiyanto, J., Siagian, P. R., & Wau, H. S. M. (2024, February). Alter Ego of Payments Royalties for Songs and Music on Radio Stations. In International Conference On Law, Economic & Good Governance (IC-LAW 2023) (pp. 655-661). Atlantis Press.

Baisuni, H., Djulaeka, D., & Sajjad, M. A. (2024). Legal Protection For Unauthorized Copying Of Songs On Digital Platforms Through Audio Watermarking Method. JUSTISI, 10(3), 547-564.

Bansal, K. (2024). Copyright Law and Performers' Rights in the Entertainment Industry: A Case Study Analysis of India and Australia (Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne).

Darmantho, A. (2024). Copyright in the Art Industry: Ethical and Management Challenges for Artwork Protection. Jurnal Seni Musik, 13(1), 42-58.

Giga, G. (2024). The role and challenges of collective management organizations in copyright protection. Актуальные исследования, (41 (223)), 6-11.

Gupta, E., & Agrawal, A. (2024). Who do we pay for Music: Artists or DSP's. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(1), 890-900.

Hadziarapovic, N., van Steenbergen, M., Ravesteijn, P., Versendaal, J., & Mertens, G. Integrating Stakeholder Values in System of Collective Management of Music Copyrights: A Value-Sensitive Design Approach.

Halim, T., Harsha, R., & Sinurat, G. (2024). Juridical Analysis: Unraveling Malaysia’s Modification of the Song”˜ Halo-Halo Bandung’Within the Legal Parameters of Law No. 24 of 2014. Anthology: Inside Intellectual Property Rights, 2(1), 300-316.

Herbst, J. P., Williams, K., Tolstad, I. M., & Barber, S. (2025). The Benefits of Collaborative Popular Music Songwriting: A Spectrum of Artist-Songwriter Involvement. Popular Music and Society, 48(1), 1-24..

Hithaishree, D. N., & Banerjee, J. Exploring Intellectual Property Rights: Legal Frameworks, Case Studies, And Societal Implications.

Isaac, J. S., & Sundharam, A. (2025). Recalibrating originality for music in copyright law. International Journal of Law and Management, 67(3), 363-371.

Junitasari, I. D. (2024). The Effectiveness of The National Collective Management Institute in Song or Music Royalty Management Based on Lawrence M. Friedman's Theory. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 4(1).

Kapsoulis, N. (2024). Blockchains beyond Digital Currencies: privacy-priented implementations of industrial architectures.

Kirui, A. K. (2024). Ethical dilemmas and copyright challenges among independent artists in Kenya's music industry. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (JHSS), 3(1), 13-22.

Kiss, B. (2024). Unlocking research: a study of UK copyright law and copyright licences in light of Open access versus traditional publishing (Doctoral dissertation, C).

Kumar, P. (2024). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): Nurturing Creativity, Fostering Innovation. ldealistic Journal of Advanced Research in Progressive Spectrums (IJARPS) eISSN–2583-6986, 3(02), 32-38.

Kumar, T., & Mahajan, R. (2024). The Digital Sonata: Digitalization’s Impact on India’s Music Industry and Artist Revenues. Digital Society, 3(3), 1-26.

Litoama, F. (2024). The Legal Certainty of Legitimate Ownership in Copyright Works of Songs or Music, as well as Associated Rights in Non-Declarative Recording in accordance with the Royalty Management System under Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021 (Case Study on Copyrigh. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 2(1), 1-13..

Morroi, L. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Ecofeminist Theory on Contemporary Art: A focus on National Participations at the 59th Venice Art Biennale (2022).

Nordås, H. K. (2024). Copyright and trade in the digital music industry. In Handbook of Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights (pp. 177-190). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Panjaitan, H., Betlehn, A., Situmeang, T., Khan, M. Z. K., & Miraz, M. H. (2024). Music Copyright Protection in The Digital Era: Legal Framework and Strategies for Enforcement. Jurnal Hukum UNISSULA, 40(2), 235-257.

Perot, E. (2025). Music Copyright Ownership: Factors Behind the Increase in Writer Credits and Rights Clearance. Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law, 14.

Ruhtiani, M., Prihatinah, T. L., Sulistyandari, S., Park, H. K., & Whindari, Y. (2024). Legal Protection of Architectural Works as Copyright: An Epistemological and Islamic Law Perspective. El-Mashlahah, 14(1), 43-70.

Setiawan, A. (2025). Konflik Royalti” Performing Rights” dan Polarisasi Musisi. Kompas Id.

Shroff, L. (2024). AI & copyright: A case study of the music industry. GRACE: Global Review of AI Community Ethics, 2(1).

Sianipar, S. D. A. H. B., & Harahap, M. Y. (2024). Unlawful Acts as a Result of Payment of Compensation Through Royalty Rights Perpsective of Law Number 28 Year 2014 Copyright. Journal Equity of Law and Governance, 5(2), 8-14.

Soraya, J., & Althafzufar, M. A. (2024). Intellectual Property Rights Protection for Actors in the Creative Economy Based on Intellectual Property Rights Law Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyright. Realism: Law Review, 2(1), 39-53.

Utama, A. N. R., Palar, M. R. A., & Muchtar, H. N. (2024). ReView Of Reversionary Rights In The Sold-Flat Agreement Of Song Creation Associated With Law Number 28 Of 2014 On Copyright. Transnational Business Law Journal, 5(1), 15-35.

Veluwenkamp, H. (2025). What responsibility gaps are and what they should be. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(1), 1-13.

Walther, J. (2024). The Right to Equitable Remuneration in South African Copyright Law: An Analysis of the Current Copyright Reform with Special Consideration of the Legal Treatment of Changed Material Contractual Circumstances. LIT Verlag Münster.

Yuan, Q., & Chen, T. (2025). Holding AI-based systems accountable in the public sector: A systematic review. Public Performance & Management Review, 1-34.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-18