Pluralism of Customary Criminal Law: A Comparison between Indonesia and Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6307Keywords:
legal pluralism,, customary criminal law,, indigenous communities., Indonesia,, Brazil,Abstract
Legal pluralism is an unavoidable reality in countries with diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds, including Indonesia and Brazil. Therefore, it is important to conduct a comparative study on the practices of customary criminal law pluralism in both countries. This research employs normative juridical and empirical methods to examine both the constitutional basis and practical implementation of
indigenous legal traditions. The findings indicate that although both countries recognize the existence of customary law, they differ in legislative approaches, implementation strategies, and the relationship between state law and indigenous community law. Preventive and repressive legal protections are evaluated, emphasizing the need for clearer codification, participatory governance, and cultural
sensitivity. Hindering factors such as legal fragmentation and political resistance are also identified. This study further recommends the necessity of formal recognition and integrative mechanisms that not only protect the rights of indigenous peoples but also ensure legal certainty and justice in a more inclusive manner. Future research is suggested to explore broader longitudinal and comparative frameworks.
Downloads
References
Atuguba, Raymond A. 2021. “Legal Pluralism in Africa: Three Levels and Seven Types of Law.” in The Routledge Handbook of African Law. Routledge.
Banks, Sarah, Angie Hart, Kate Pahl, and Paul Ward, eds. 2019. Co-Producing Research. 1st ed. Bristol University Press.
Bedner, Adriaan, and Yance and Arizona. 2019. “Adat in Indonesian Land Law: A Promise for the Future or a Dead End?” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 20(5):416–34. doi: 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246.
Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von, and Bertram and Turner. 2018. “Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 50(3):255–74. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674.
Bengoetxea, Joxerramon. 2022. “Legal Institutions as Comparators of Legal Cultures.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 12(6):1647–73. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1361.
Berger, Tobias. 2021. “The ‘Global South’ as a Relational Category – Global Hierarchies in the Production of Law and Legal Pluralism.” Third World Quarterly 42(9):2001–17. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2020.1827948.
Calafate, Pedro. 2018. “The Rights of the Indigenous Peoples of Brazil.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 25(2):183–209.
Cribb, Robert. 2010. “Legal Pluralism and Criminal Law in the Dutch Colonial Order.” Indonesia (90):47–66.
Diala, Jane C. 2020. “Normative Authority of Non-State Laws within Legal and Institutional Pluralism in Nigeria.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies 38(3):459–74. doi: 10.1080/02589001.2020.1779197.
Flambonita, Suci. 2021. “THE CONCEPT OF LEGAL PLURALISM IN INDONESIA IN THE NEW SOCIAL MOVEMENT.” Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 10(3). doi: 10.20961/jas.v10i0.45939.
Gebeye, Berihun Adugna. 2021. “Global Constitutionalism and Cultural Diversity: The Emergence of Jurisgenerative Constitutionalism in Africa.” Global Constitutionalism 10(1):40–71. doi: 10.1017/S2045381720000350.
Goodale M, Merry SE. 2007. The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guerrero-Moreno, Mayerly Alexandra, and José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior. 2024. “Approaches, Trends, and Gaps in Community-Based Ecotourism Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications between 2002 and 2022.” Historia Contemporanea 16(7). doi: 10.3390/su16072639.
Gümüsay, Ali A. 2020. “The Potential for Plurality and Prevalence of the Religious Institutional Logic.” Business & Society 59(5):855–80. doi: 10.1177/0007650317745634.
Ho, Peter. 2022. “Debunking the Chinese Unitary State via Legal Pluralism: Historical, Indigenous and Customary Rights in China (1949–Present).” World Development 151:105752. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105752.
Holden, Livia. 2020. “Cultural Expertise and Law: An Historical Overview.” Law and History Review 38(1):29–46. doi: 10.1017/S073824801900049X.
Leclair, Jean. 2022. “Parameters of Action in a Context of Legal Pluralism.” in Applied Legal Pluralism. Routledge.
Lisboa, João. 2022. “Indigenous Peoples and the Judiciary in Brazil: An Appeal for a Legal Anthropology Approach.” Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 19. doi: 10.1590/1809-43412022v19a803.
Malloy, Tove H. 2020. “A New Research Agenda for Theorizing Non-Territorial Autonomy?” in Non-Territorial Autonomy and Decentralization. Routledge.
Manse, Maarten. 2024. “The Plural Legacies of Legal Pluralism: Local Practices and Contestations of Customary Law in Late Colonial Indonesia.” Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis 56(3):328–48. doi: 10.1080/27706869.2024.2377447.
Möller, Lena-Maria. 2022. “United Arab Emirates: Temporary Multiculturalism, but Permanent Legal Pluralism?” Pp. 101–17 in Normativity and Diversity in Family Law: Lessons from Comparative Law, edited by N. Yassari and M.-C. Foblets. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Nardin, Terry, and David R. Mapel. 2021. “International Society : Diverse Ethical Perspectives.” 1–288.
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2021. “The End of Global Pluralism?” European Journal of International Relations 27(4):1249–73. doi: 10.1177/13540661211017273.
Roth, Dik, and Sandrayati Moniaga. 2021. “Interview with Sandrayati Moniaga: Legal Pluralism and the Struggle for Recognition of Customary Rights in Indonesia.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53:485–97. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2021.2017641.
Saihu, Made, Nasaruddin Umar, Ahmad Thib Raya, and Akhmad Shunhaji. 2022. “Multicultural Education Based on Religiosity to Enhance Social Harmonization within Students: A Study in a Public Senior High School.” Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction 12(3):265–74. doi: 10.47750/pegegog.12.03.28.
Sánchez, Victoria, Nina Wallerstein, Christina Alaniz, Lorenda Belone, Elizabeth Dickson, Tassy Parker, and Shannon Sanchez-Youngman. 2025. “Innovation in Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Education: A Summer Institute on Indigenous and Critical Methodologies.” Pedagogy in Health Promotion 23733799251318690. doi: 10.1177/23733799251318690.
Santos Da Guarda, Leandro. 2018. “MULTICULTURALISM AND CRIMINAL LAW: CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN BRAZIL.” Doctoral Thesis, Università degli studi Roma Tre.
Sulaiman, Sulaiman, Ali Imran, Bachtari Alam Hidayat, Saepudin Mashuri, Reslawati Reslawati, and Fakhrurrazi Fakhrurrazi. 2022. “Moderation Religion in the Era Society 5.0 and Multicultural Society: Studies Based on Legal, Religious, and Social Reviews.” Linguistics and Culture Review 180–93. doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v6nS5.2106.
Topidi, Kyriaki. 2020. “Faith Education in Britain: A Normatively Pluralist Scenario in the Making.” in Non-Territorial Autonomy and Decentralization. Routledge.
Tusseau, Guillaume. 2021. “Debating Legal Pluralism and Constitutionalism: New Trajectories for Legal Theory in the Global Age.” Pp. 507–56 in General Reports of the XXth General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law - Rapports généraux du XXème Congrès général de l’Académie internationale de droit comparé, edited by K. Boele-Woelki, D. P. Fernández Arroyo, and A. Senegacnik. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Utama, Tody Sasmitha Jiwa. 2021. “Between Adat Law and Living Law: An Illusion of Customary Law Incorporation into Indonesia Penal System.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53(2):269–89. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2021.1945222.
Utama, Tody, Rikardo Simarmata, Jacqueline Vel, and Adriaan Bedner. 2024. “New Ways of Teaching Adat (Customary) Law at Indonesian Law Schools.” The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies 4(1). doi: 10.54828/ijsls.2024v4n1.2.
Wardhani, Lita Tyesta Addy Listya, Noho ,Muhammad Dzikirullah H, and Aga and Natalis. 2022. “The Adoption of Various Legal Systems in Indonesia: An Effort to Initiate the Prismatic Mixed Legal Systems.” Cogent Social Sciences 8(1):2104710. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2022.2104710.
Wolkmer, Antonio Carlos, and Maria de Fátima Schumacher Wolkmer. 2022. “The Principle of the ‘Common’, Legal Pluralism and Decolonization in Latin America.” Law and Critique 33(1):63–87. doi: 10.1007/s10978-021-09285-z.
Yilmaz, Ihsan. 2023. “Muslim Secularism by Conduct: Attitudes of Young Australian Muslims to Legal Pluralism and Sharia.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 44(2):274–88. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2022.2104826.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Judy Marria Saimima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
