Harmonizing the Legality of Nominee Agreements with Corporate Law in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6424Keywords:
Nominee agreement, legality of agreement, limited liability company, legal synchronization, corporate lawAbstract
The business process of development that occurs in Indonesia is increasingly marked by the rampant implementation of nominee agreements to form Limited Liability Companies (PT), especially carried out by foreign parties who want to avoid restrictions on share ownership. Although contractually nominee agreements can be categorized as agreements that are appropriate to meet the legal requirements as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. However, substantially, its existence is contrary to the principles and provisions of corporate law, especially in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This study aims to analyze the legal disharmony between the legality of agreements according to civil law and the principle of legality of establishment and ownership of shares in company law. This research uses normative juridical methods with laws and regulations, conceptual, and case study approaches. The results of the study show that the nominee agreement creates legal ambiguity that has the potential to harm the legal interests of the parties and weaken the integrity of the national legal system. Therefore, synchronization between the two needs to be done. This synchronization can be done through strengthening supervision, enforcing the principle of transparency, and harmonizing regulations across sectors.
Downloads
References
Abdulkadir, M. (2001). Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Adhitya, C. R. (2024). Analisis perbandingan hukum keabsahan perjanjian pinjam nama kepemilikan saham di Indonesia dan Singapura. Universitas Pelita Harapan.
Amiruddin, & Zainal Asikin. (2017). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Anwar Ibrahim, M. (2023). Analisis hukum atas peran dan tanggung jawab direktur nominee dalam perseroan terbatas. Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 3(1), 44–52
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Fatima, Y. (2014). Legal Aspects of Foreign Direct Investment in Indonesia: An Analysis of Nominee Arrangements. Indonesia Law Review, 4(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v4n3.97
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). (2019). Pedoman Identifikasi Beneficial Ownership untuk Sektor Swasta. Jakarta: KPK RI.
Nivia. (2023). Dualisme pengaturan beneficial ownership di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 35(1), 29–58.
Ramadina, M., & Latumeten, P. E. (2023). Praktik nominee dalam pranata hukum perseroan terbatas di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5461–5467
Subekti. (2002). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini. (1993). Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Perlindungan yang Seimbang bagi Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).
OECD. (2016). Beneficial Ownership and Control: A Comparative Overview. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan No. 601 K/Pdt/1983.
Wicaksono, L. S. (2023). Kepastian hukum nominee agreement kepemilikan saham perseroan terbatas. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(1), 49–64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iin Indriani, Ema Farida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













