The Proper Regulation of Collective Trademarks for MSMEs Based on Legal Certainty: A Comparative Study with Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.6616Keywords:
Collective Trademarks, Legal Certainty, Micro, Small, Medium EnterprisesAbstract
Collective trademarks can be an alternative for trademark protection for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) considering the greater benefits compared to regular trademarks. In 2024, there was an increase in the number of collective trademark applications, indicating that the public, especially MSMEs, are becoming more aware of the importance of trademark protection. However, issues have been found in the legislation regarding collective trademarks. This article aims to formulate the appropriate arrangements of collective trademark legislation that align with the MSME climate in Indonesia to achieve legal certainty. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. The regulation of collective trademarks in Indonesia will be compared with Brazil based on Law No. 9.279 of May 14, 1996, as amended by Law No. 14.200 of September 2, 2021. This research found that Law Number 20 of 2016 still contains several issues, namely the ambiguity of norms and articles that lead to multiple interpretations among the public. The provisions on collective trademarks in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 67 of 2016 (MIG Law) regulate substance similar to that stated in the MIG Law, whereas it should provide a more detailed and technical explanation. On the other hand, Law Number 15 of 2001, which was the previous regulation before the enactment of the MIG Law, provides a more comprehensive regulation on collective trademarks compared to the MIG Law. Thus, the legislation regarding collective trademarks does not yet provide legal certainty. The comparison with Brazil provides recommendations for appropriate arrangements, indicating the need for revisions and improvements to the legislation on collective trademarks to meet the need for more adequate regulations.
Downloads
References
Bruch, K. L., Vieira, A. C. P., & Barbosa, P. M. Da S. (2015). O Direito Fundamental À Proteção Dos Signos Distintivos: Uma Análise Comparativa Entre Marcas Coletivas E Indicações Geográficas No Ordenamento Jurídico Brasileiro. Balcão Do Consumidor: Constitucionalismo, Novas Tecnologias E Sustentabilidade. Passo Fundo: Editora Da Upf, 229–254.
Calboli, I. (2023). The Combined Use Of Trademarks Or Service Mark With Certifications Marks Or Collective Marks. Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights, Neil Wilkof, Shamnad Basheer, And Irene Calboli, Eds., 475–504.
Dewi, N. M. T., Brahmantya, I. B. B., & Diputra, K. Y. A. (2024). Pengaturan Hukum Penggunaan Merek Kolektif Terdaftar Berdasarkan Pasal 79 Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Kerta Dyatmika, 23(2), 1–12.
Hermawan, I. A., & Habibi, D. (2020). Peran Negara Dan Kepastian Hukum Guna Akselerasi Perolehan Haki. Research Fair Unisri, 4(1), 458–474.
Lukito, R. (2022). “Compare But Not To Compare”: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Di Indonesia. Dalam Undang: Jurnal Hukum (Vol. 5, Nomor 2). Https://Doi.Org/10.22437/Ujh.5.2.257-291
Masnun, M. A. (2019). Reorientasi Pengaturan Pemberdayaan Hukum Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Melalui Hak Atas Merek Kolektif. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(2), 217–234.
Mayana, R. F., & Santika, T. (2021). Hukum Merek: Perkembangan Aktual Pelindungan Merek Dalam Konteks Ekonomi Kreatif Di Era Disrupsi Digital. Refika.
Megatri, E. (2019). Potensi Pendaftaran Merek Kolektif Terhadap Pedagang Keripik Di Kawasan Sentra Industri Keripik Kota Bandar Lampung. Dalam Jalan Sunyi Sang Guru (Hlm. 346–363). Pkkp-Ham Fh Unila.
Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.
Natalia, S. W., & Ayuni, Q. (2023). Pembentukan Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Dalam Berbagai Konstitusi Di Dunia. Jisip (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 7(2), 1514–1526. Https://Doi.Org/10.58258/Jisip.V7i2.4956/Http
Pangkalan Data Kekayaan Intelektual. (T.T.). Https://Pdki-Indonesia.Dgip.Go.Id/
Prasetyo, R. A. (2022). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Hak Cipta) Sebagai Objek Waris Dalam Hukum Perdata. Jipro: Journal Of Intellectual Property, 5(1), 58–75.
Prawreti, I. A. S. M., & Indrawati, A. A. S. (2022). Pendaftaran Merek Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Pada Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah. Jurnal Kertha Wicara, 11(2).
Ramli, A. M., Sh, M. H., Palar, M. R. A., & Sh, L. L. M. (2021). Kekayaan Intelektual Pengantar Indikasi Geografis. Penerbit Alumni.
Ranti Fauza Mayana And Tisni Santika, 108. (T.T.).
Riswandi, B. A. (2020). Hukum Merek Kolektif: Teori Dan Praktik Di Indonesia Dan Beberapa Negara. Uii Press.
Salsabillah, W., Tarissyaa, U., Azizah, N., Fathona, T., & Raihan, M. (2023). The Role Of Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises (Msmes) In Supporting The Indonesian Economy. Indonesian Journal Of Multidisciplinary Sciences (Ijoms), 2(2), 255–263.
Sukmadewi, Y. D. (2017). Pendaftaran Merek Asosiasi Sebagai Merek Kolektif (Kajian Terhadap Asosiasi Rajut Indonesia Wilayah Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 2(1), 109–136. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Jic.V2i1.547
Suryansyah, S. (2024). Optimalisasi Merek Kolektif Di Kawasan Negara Serumpun Dalam Kerangka “Asean Framework Agreement On Intellectual Property Cooperation.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 18(2), 103. Https://Doi.Org/10.30641/Kebijakan.2024.V18.103-118
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Audiya Dewi Rachmawati, Rika Ratna Permata, Laina Rafianti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
