The Relationship of State Power Branches in the Perspective of Trias Politika Theory After 25 Years of Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6698Keywords:
Trias politika; pembagian kekuasaa; reformasi; ketatanegaraan; checks and balances.Abstract
This study examines the configuration of relations between the branches of state power in Indonesia—executive, legislative, and judicial—from the perspective of the trias politika theory, after two and a half decades of the reform era. The 1998 reform became an important milestone in the paradigm shift in the state constitution, marked by efforts to redistribute power to erode the dominance of the executive that emerged during the New Order period. With a juridical-normative approach and qualitative-descriptive analysis methods, this study examines various laws and regulations, institutional practices, and important decisions of judicial institutions that reflect the dynamics of relations between branches of power. The findings show that although normatively there is a more proportionate separation and division of powers, there are still practical identification of the tendency to dominate the executive branch, weak legislative control, and challenges to the independence of the judiciary. The implication of this condition shows the need to substantively strengthen the principle of checks and balances, as well as continuous institutional reform so that the ideals of trias politik can be actualized in a democratic and accountable system of government.
Downloads
References
Aimi Solidei Manalu and Samuel Jafar Hotmangara Tua Siahaan. 2022. “Independensi Penegak Hukum Dan Pengawasan Preventif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019.” Jurnal Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi 2 (22). https://doi.org/10.7454/JKD.v2i2.1207.
Butt Simon. 2015. “The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 19 (2). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250598_003.
———. 2019. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reconfiguring Decentralization for Better or Worse?” Asian Journal Of Comparative Law 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.19.
Butt Simon and Tim Lindsey. 2019. Indonesia: Law and Society. (2nd Edition). The Federation Press.
Desi Indriyani. 2018. “Penegakan Hukum Berkeadilan Sebagai Perwujudan Demokrasi Indonesia.” Adalah: Buletin Hukum Dan Keadilan 2 (6). https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v2i6.8554.
Donald L. Horowitz. 2013. Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139225724.
Fenwick, S. 2016. “Judicial Independence in Indonesia: Problems and Prospects.” Journal of East Asian Studies 16 (2).
Hamid B. 2020. “Pelemahan KPK Dan Krisis Penegakan Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 50 (3).
Jeffrey A. Winters. 2012. Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. 2005. Hukum Tata Negara Dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Konstitusi Press.
———. 2006. Format Kelembagaan Negara Dan Pergeseran Kekuasaan Dalam UUD 1945. Fakultas Hukm Universitas Indonesia.
John Ferejohn and Pasquale Pasquino. 2004. “The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210.
LIPI. 2021. Survei Persepsi Publik Terhadap Lembaga Negara. Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. LIPI.
M. Faishal Aminuddin and M. Fajar Shodiq Ramadlan. 2022. “Electoral System and Party Survival: The Case of Indonesian Democracy 1999-2019.” Jurnal Politik 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v8i1.1105.
Marco Bunte and Andreas Ufen. 2009. Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Routledge.
Marcus Mietzner. 2009. Political Islam and Democracy in Indonesia. ISEAS.
———. 2013. Money, Power, and Ideology: Political Parties in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. NUS Press.
Mardhatillah, Yusra Fajriyah, Gamaliel Ekklesius Purba, and Rahma Fitri. 2024. “Kedudukan Hukum Tata Negara Dalam Menjamin Keberlangsungan Demokrasi Konstitusional.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v6i1.5581.
Mietzner M. 2009. Democracy in Indonesia. ISEAS.
Montesquieu. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws (Edisi Terjemahan). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Aslinya: De l’esprit des lois, 1748).
———. 2010. (The) Spirit of Laws: Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Dan Ilmu Politik. Jakarta Nusa Media.
Philipus M Hadjon. 2007. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Pompe Sebastiaan. 2005. The Indonesian Supreme Court: A Study of Institutional Collapse. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program.
R. William Liddle and Saiful Mujani. 2013. Indonesian Democracy: From Transition to Consolidation. Columbia University Press.
Ratih Adiputri. 2018. “The Empowerment of Parliament in the Transition from an Authoritarian to a Democratic Regime: Indonesian Experiences and Problems.” Parliaments, Estates and Representation 38 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2018.1427319.
Ross Tapsell. 2020. “Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens and the Digital Revolution.” Open Edition Journals, December. https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.2278.
Soerjono Soekanto. 2006. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).
Stephen Sherlock. 2010. The DPR and Legislative Reform: Making a Start to Strengthen Representative Democracy. Centre for Democratic Institutions Paper, Australian National University.
Sunarto. 2017. “Fungsi Legislasi DPR Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945.” Jurnal Integralistik 28 (1). https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v28i1.11814.
Susi Dwi Ariyanti and Tim Lindsey. 2006. “Indonesia: General Elections Test the Instruments of Reform.” Electoral Studies 25 (3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.05.001.
Vedi R. Hadiz. 2016. Islamic Populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amelia Haryanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
















