Axiological Aspects of Legal Science from the Muhammadiyah Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6835Keywords:
Muhammadiyah Tarjih Council, objectives of legal science, Islamic Sharia, FiqhAbstract
This study aims to determine the purpose of legal science for Muhammadiyah, specifically the Majelis Tarjih (Islamic Council of Muhammadiyah). This is highly urgent, because the Majelis Tarjih is an entity within Muhammadiyah that is responsible for providing solutions to the problems of the people's lives, especially Muhammadiyah members and Muslims in general. In general, the purpose of legal science is to ensure justice, legal certainty, and benefit. Legal scholars have provided an overview of justice, legal certainty, and benefit. Some argue that law is just if it has legal certainty. Meanwhile, the law is certain if it is written or codified. On the side of benefit, there are also many differences. Is the benefit for the victim only, or for the perpetrator as well? The above matters are constantly experiencing dynamics. Therefore, Muhammadiyah, in this case the Majelis Tarjih, wants to provide an alternative purpose of legal science. Based on this, this research has a fairly high urgency, considering that the Majelis Tarjih in its legal istbath should not deviate from the purpose of the law itself. This research method is normative research with a library approach. The research begins by analyzing Islamic sharia by classifying what is fixed (muthasibat) and what is changeable (muthaghoiroh). These two aspects are then discussed in dialogue with the objectives of sharia (maqasidu shari'ah). In the next stage, the author will study the istinbat method of the tarjih assembly's law to synchronize the objectives of law with the istinbath method of the Muhammadiyah tarjih assembly. The findings of this study are that the objectives of law from the Muhammadiyah perspective are flexible. This flexibility lies in achieving benefits and avoiding harm.
Downloads
References
Abbas, Afifi Fauzi. “Maqashid Al-Syariah Dan Maslahah Dalam Pengembangan Pemikiran Islam Di Muhammadiyah.” Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilisation and Learning Societies, Al-Imam 2 (2021).
Abidin, Zainal. “Eksistensi Al-Maṣlaḥah Al-Mursalah Dalam Pandangan Majelis Tarjih Muhammadiyah.” Qaimuddin: Journal of Constitutional Law Review 4, no. 2 (2024).
Achmad, Shodiq Abdullah, Akhmad Shodikin, and Anne Haerany. “Analisis Tentang Model Madzhab Fiqh Muhammadiyah (Analisis Tentang Hukum Islam Dalam Perspektif Kaum Modernis Indonesia).” Al-Mustashfa: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Islam 7, no. 2 (2022).
Adinugraha, Hendri Hermawan, and Mashudi. “Al-Maslahah Al-Mursalah Dalam Penentuan Hukum.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 4, no. 1 (2018): 63–75.
Anwar, Syamsul. Manhaj Tarjih Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: Panitia Musyawarah Nasional Tarjih Muhammadiyah XXX), 2018.
Ayu, Kemala, and Muhammad Adnan Azzak. “Landasan Filosofi Pemikiran Ekonomi Syariah: Maslahah Sebagai Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah.” Hamalatul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al- Qur’an 5, no. 2 (2024): 820.
Bakhtiar. “Corak Pemikiran Hukum Majelis Tarjih Muhammadiyah.” Jurnal Psikologi Islam Al Qalb 9, no. 1 (2017).
Dimyati, K., Haedar Nashir, Elviandri Elviandri, Absori Absori, Kelik Wardiono, and Arief Budiono. “Indonesia as a Legal Welfare State: A Prophetic-Transcendental Basis.” Heliyon 7, no. 8 (2021): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07865.
Khudzaifah Dimyati and Kelik Wardiono, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Surakarta: UMS Press: 2004).
Ediz, M. Hidayat, and Yecki Bus. “Majelis Tarjih Dan Tajdid Sebagai Pemengang Otoritas Fatwa Muhammdiyah.” Journal Al-Ahkam 21, no. 1 (2020).
Guney, Necmeddin. “Maq’asid Al-Shar’ıah in Islamic Finance: A Critical Analysis of Modern Discourses.” Religions 15, no. 114 (2024): 9.
Hakim, Abdul, Ridzwan Ahmad, and Syed Mohd Jeffri Syed Jaafar. “Maqasid Al-Shari’ah as A Method of Renewing Islamic Law in the Fatwa of Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah: Analytical Study of Bank Interest Law in Indonesia.” Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah (Journal of Islamic Economics) 15, no. 2 (2023): 274.
Hamzah, K. “Revitalisasi Teori Maslahat Mulghah Al-Tuhfi Dan Relevansinya Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ahkam 15, no. 1 (2015): 28.
Kholidah. “Dinamika Manhâj Tarjih Muhammadiyah Dalam Merespon Persoalan-Persoalan Hukum.” Istinbáth Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam 20, no. 1 (2021).
Majelis Tarjih PP. Muhammadiyah. Tanfiz Muktamar Tarjih XXII Tahun 1990. Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah, 1990.
Misran. “Al-Mashlahah Mursalah: Suatu Metodologi Alternatif Dalam Menyelesaikan Persoalan Hukum Kontemporer.” Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 5, no. 1 (2020): 60.
Muhajirin, and May Dedu. “Mashlahah Mursalah Dan Implementasinya Dalam Akad Muamalah.” Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 9, no. 1 (2021): 177.
Muhaki, and Husein Aziz. “Maqashid Al -Syari‘Ah Sebagai Instrumen Pembaruan Fiqh Sosial Kontemporer (Tela’Ah Terhadap Pemikiran Ibnu Ashur).” Al-Ibrah 9, no. 2 (2024): 132.
Nashir, Haedar. Muhammadiyah Gerakan Pembaruan. Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah, 2010.
Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah (Head of Muhammadiyah Center). Anggaran Dasar Dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga Muhammadiyah (Muhammadiyah Statutes and Bylaws). Yogyakarta: Head of Muhammadiyah Center, 2019.
Radbruch, Gustav. Legal Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950.
———. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 1–11.
Rusdi, Muhammad Ali. “Maslahat Sebagai Metode Ijtihad Dan Tujuan Utama Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Syari’ah Dan Hukum Diktum 15, no. 2 (2017): 151–68.
Sari, Novita. “Maslahah Mursalah As A Consideration For Completion Of Islamic Law Based On The Maqāṣid Sharī`Ah Principle.” ICHES: International Conference on Humanity Education and Society 3, no. 1 (2024): 9.
Shabbar, Said. Ijtihad and Renewal. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2017.
Tim Penyusun. Kemuhammadiyahan. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Madrasah Mu‟allimin Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 2008.
Umar, Abdullah. “Maqasid Syari’ah and the Renewal of the Tradition in Understanding Fiqh The Institute for Research and Community Service.” Jurnal Elsyakhshi 2, no. 2 (2024): 75.
Waid, Abdul, and Niken Lestari. “Teori Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Kontemporer Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Relevansinya Dengan Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional.” LABATILA: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Islam 4, no. 2 (2020).
Wardiono, K. “Prophetic: An Epistemological Offer for Legal Studies.” Journal of Law and Justice 1, no. 1 (2019): 17–41. https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v1i1.8797.
Wulandari, Cahya. “Dinamika Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 5, no. 1 (2020): 233–49. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v10i2.12233.
Zuhdi, Muhammad Harfin, and Mohamad Abdun Nasir. “Al-Mashlahah and Reinterpretation of Islamic Law in Contemporary Context.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 3 (2024): 1825.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kelik, Junaidi, wardah, Isman, Trisno, Syamsul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
