Reconstruction Of The Interpretation Of Default In The Fiduciary Agreement On Execution After The Decision Of The Constitutional Court Number 18/Puu-Xvii/2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6895Keywords:
Breach of Contract, Constitutional Court Ruling, Fiduciary Security, Default in Contract, Constitutional ReviewAbstract
In financing practices in Indonesia, fiduciary guarantees play a crucial role for both creditors and debtors. However, their implementation often creates inequality because the determination of default is made unilaterally by the creditor. Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 presents a new interpretation that emphasizes justice, legal protection for debtors, and the importance of the judicial process. The purpose of this study is to understand the impact of this shift in the interpretation of default on the validity and implementation of fiduciary guarantees in financing practices in Indonesia, as well as to analyze the legal considerations of Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 regarding the validity of execution and legal protection for creditors and debtors. This study uses a normative juridical methodology with a statutory and conceptual approach. Data were collected through a literature review of legal norms, Constitutional Court decisions, scientific doctrines, legal writings, and supplemented with secondary data from the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and the Indonesian Financing Companies Association (APPI). The results of the study indicate more specifically that after the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. Based on Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, there was a 35% decrease in reports of disputes over the execution of fiduciary guarantees in district courts during the 2020–2023 period, reflecting increased compliance by financing institutions with the principle of due process of law. Determination of default can no longer be made unilaterally by creditors, but must be done through a fair and proportional legal mechanism. This decision strengthens legal protection for debtors, affirms the principle of due process of law, and requires system adjustments by financing institutions, thus making an important contribution to civil law reform, particularly in the implementation of fairer, more equal, and constitutional fiduciary guarantees in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Aditya, Ryamizard Haritzidane Kasyfi, and Yunanto. (2025) “Eksekutorial Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Yang Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 4 : 1–13.
Aditya, Sundari Rizka, Lendy Siar, and Maarthen Y.Tampanguma. (2024) “Pembentukan Hukum Progresif Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Lex Privatum 13, no. 4 : 1–13.
Adrianto. 2020. Manajemen Kredit Teori Dan Konsep Bagi Bank Umum. Pasuruan: Qiara Media.
Arfiani, Merry. (2022) “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Jurnal Ilmu Dan Budaya 43, no. 2 : 2022. https://doi.org/10.47313/jib.v43i2.1719.
Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun, and Rahcmad Budi Suharto. (2020) “Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees and Inclusion of Default Clauses in Indonesia.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10: 33–38. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.05
Djalali, La Ode Muhammad Irman, La Niasa, and St. Fatmawati L. (2020) “Tinjauan Delik Penarikan Paksa Terhadap Barang Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Kasus Di PT. Adira Dinamika Multifinance Cabang Kota Kendari) La.” Sultra Law Review 02, no. 2 : 1156–70.
Dwi Prilia, Ega, Suphia Suphia, and Supianto Supianto. (2023) “Perubahan Makna Cidera Janji Atau Wanprestasi Pada Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Welfare State Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 : 163–92. https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v2i2.2401.
Farida, Hasna, and Siti Malikhatun Badriyah. (2024) “Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kreditor Dan Debt Collector.” Notarius 17, no. 1 : 356–69.
Fitrianto, I. (2024). Critical Reasoning Skills: Designing an Education Curriculum Relevant to Social and Economic Needs. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 245-258
Fitrianto, I. (2024). Innovation and Technology in Arabic Language Learning in Indonesia: Trends and Implications. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 134-150.
Fitrianto, I. (2024). Strategi Guru Pai Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Hadis Kelas 8 MTS Ibadurrahman Subaim. IJER: Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 356-363.
Fitrianto, I. (2025). Beyond Competence: Rethinking Education for Holistic Well-Being and Happiness. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 1-11.
Fitrianto, I., & Abdillah, F. M. (2018). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROGAM PEMANTAPAN BAHASA ARAB DAN SHAHSIAH (KEMBARA) KE 4 MAHASISWA KOLEJ UNIVERSITI ISLAM ANTAR BANGSA SELANGOR (KUIS) TAHUN 2018. University of Darussalam Gontor 15-16 September 2018, 121.
Fitrianto, I., & Farisi, M. (2025). Integrating Local Wisdom into 21st Century Skills: A Contextual Framework for Culturally Relevant Pedagogy in Rural Classrooms. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 109-121.
Fitrianto, I., & Layalin, N. A. (2025). The Paradigm of Physical Punishment from the Perspective of Islamic Education and Its Implementation in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 147-156.
Fitrianto, I., & Saif, A. (2024). The role of virtual reality in enhancing Experiential Learning: a comparative study of traditional and immersive learning environments. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 97-110.
Fitrianto, I., Al-Faruqi, M. R., & Hanifah, N. A. (2025). The Contributions of Ibn Malik to Arabic Language Education: A Historical and Pedagogical Analysis. IJAS: International Journal of Arabic Studies, 1-11.
Fitrianto, I., Hamid, R., & Mulalic, A. (2023). The effectiveness of the learning strategy" think, talk, write" and snowball for improving learning achievement in lessons insya'at Islamic Boarding School Arisalah. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 13-22.
Haroen, Rayhan Aminuddin. (2022) “Legal Protection for Debtors in the Implementation of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects Execution After the Enactment of the Constitutional Court Verdict No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Legal Brief 11, no. 4: 2587–94. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.xx.xx
Hertanto, Sandrarina, and Gunawan Djajaputra. (2024) “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 4 : 10368–80.
Jadidah, Fikrotul. (2022) “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 18/Puu-Xvii/2019).” Iblam Law Review 2, no. 2 : 18–38. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v2i2.69.
Kahar, Amrun, Alhiday Nur, Hasirudin Hasri, and Dian Setiawati. (2023) “Analisis Hukum Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen/Sewa Beli Antara Pelaku Usaha Kredit Elektronik Dan Forniture Terhadap Konsumen Tidak Masuk Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 1 : 1216–28.
Kasim, Ilham S. (2016) “Tinjauan Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Pada Perusahaan Pembiayaan.” Lex Crimen 5, no. 44.
Keraf, Vincenzo Verano M. (2019) “Analisis Yuridis Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/Puu-Xvii/2019.” Fiat Iustitia : Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.54367/fiat.v2i1.1427.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).
Kosasih, Johannes Ibrahim, Anak Agung Istri Agung, and Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi. 2021. “Parate Eksekusi Fidusiа: Polemik Kepastian Hukum Dan Bisnis.” Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Kurniawati, H, and A Rengga. (2016) “Implementasi Peraturan Daerah Kota Semarang Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Semarang 2011-2031 (Studi Kasus Penataan ….” Journal of Public Policy and … 5, no. 2.
Lesmana, Indra, Ardiansah, and Bahrun Azmi. (2022) “The Final Power of the Decision of the Constitutional Court in Indonesian Positive Law.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) 5, no. 1: 1765–75. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.3779
Muhammad Habibie, Rais Rahmat Nugraha, Mavelda Regina Rangkoly, and Ummi Maskana. (2025) “Legal Analysis of The Auction Process in The Fiduciary Guarantee Execution System.” Golden Ratio of Data in Summary 5, no. 1: 160–68. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.938
Nasihuddin, Abdul Aziz, Eko Arief Wibowo, Sulyanati, Kartika Winkar Setya, Nurani Ajeng Tri Utami, Kodrat Alam, Toni Riyamukti, et al. 2024. Teori Hukum Pancasila. Tasikmalaya: CV. Elvaretta Buana.
Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi, and Nurlaili Rahmawati. “Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia.” Al-Wasath 2, no. 2 (2021): 80.
Paendong, Kristiane, and Herts Taunaumang. (2022) “Kajian Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perikatan Dan Perjanjian Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata.” Lex Privatum 10, no. 3 : 1–7.
Pramudyaningtyas, Ayu, and Pujiyono. (2023) “Legal Certainty of Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 & Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 9, no. 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i6.3919
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.
Salvia, Merva Putri, and Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri. (2024) “Konstitusionalitas Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Hak Konsumen.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 2 : 275–91. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2127.
Sanjaya, Dicky Bagus, and Tamsil. (2023) “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 2/PUU-XIX/2021 Bagi Penerima Jaminan Fidusia (Kreditur).” Jurnal Novum 10, No. 1 : 109.
Satrio, J. 2014. Wanprestasi Menurut KUH Perdata, Doktrin, Dan Yurisprudensi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sembiring, Susanti. 2024. Hukum Perbankan Dan Lembaga Pembiayaan. Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara.
Sriwidodo, Joko, and Kristiawanto. 2021. Memahami Hukum Perikatan. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.
Subekti, R. 2005. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Sunardi, and Lina Alfiana. (2023) “Legal Comparison of Land Bank in Indonesia and the United States.” Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan 7, no. 2: 94–112. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v7i2.20337
Suparji. 2021. Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Pembiayaan. jakarta selatan.
Supriyadi. 2020. Hukum Perkreditan Dan Penyelesainnya (Telaah Penyelesaian Secara Non Litigasi). Semarang: Qahar Publisher.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
Wajdi, Farid, and Muhammad Yusrizal. 2024. Hukum Kontrak Dan Teknik Pembuatan Kontrak. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Wilbert, Mahmul Siregar, Detania Sukarja, and Natcha. (2024) “Legal Analysis of the Implications of the ASEAN Agreement on E-Commerce for Electronic Business Contracts in Indonesia.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 6, no. 1: 125–43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Piki Hendiko Siregar, Yuniar Rahmatiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
