The Criminalization of Money Laundering
A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia and the United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.8277Keywords:
Criminalization; Criminal Liability; Money LaunderingAbstract
This study aims to analyze and compare the construction of the criminalization of money laundering offenses in Indonesia and the United Kingdom, as well as the limits of criminal liability established through each legal regime. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results show that Indonesia and the United Kingdom share a common objective of severing the connection between the proceeds of crime and legitimate economic activities, but employ different techniques of conceptualization. Indonesia, through Articles 607 and 608 of the National Criminal Code, as well as the previous framework under Law Number 8 of 2010, places assets derived from criminal offenses, acts involving such assets, and subjective circumstances in the form of knowledge or suspicion as important elements of criminalization. The United Kingdom, through the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, particularly sections 327, 328, and 329, uses the concept of criminal property as the central point connecting criminal conduct with acts of concealment, disguise, arrangement, acquisition, use, or possession of property. The comparison demonstrates that the distinction between predicate offenses and criminal property constitutes a difference in the conceptual technique for characterizing the criminal nature of property, rather than a difference in the objective of combating money laundering. The findings indicate that the limits of criminal liability in both systems should be based on the connection between property of a criminal character, acts involving such property, and mens rea, while being controlled by the principles of legality, legal certainty, clarity of the elements of the offense, and proof of the subjective circumstances of the perpetrator. Such a construction establishes a balance between the effectiveness of combating money laundering and the protection of fundamental principles of criminal law.
Downloads
References
Arifin, M. Z., Mutmainnah, U. K., Pratama, M. F., Sapitri, W., & Ramadhan, M. S. (2025). Concealment of Assets in Money Laundering. AML/CFT Journal The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism, 3(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.59593/amlcft.2025.v3i2.75
Atika. (2023). Legal Protection of Trade Secret from the View of Civil and Criminal Law. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(2), 165–170.
Benson, K. (2025). From money laundering to illicit finance? The evolving ‘AML’ regulatory regimes for legal professionals in the UK and Australia. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 37(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2443702
Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772
Cherniei, V., Cherniavskyi, S., Babanina, V., & Tykho, О. (2021). Criminal Liability for Cryptocurrency Transactions: Global Experience. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(4), 304. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n4p304
Danish Bashir Mangi, Ihsanullah Butro, & Tahseen Akhtar Memon. (2025). AI and Criminal Liability: Theoretical Dilemmas in Applying Criminal Law to Artificial Intelligence. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 2174–2186. https://doi.org/10.59075/cxwpfa06
Eka N.A.M. Sihombing, C. H. (2022). Penelitian Hukum (1st ed.). Setara Press.
Hamidi, A. (2024). Actus Reus dan Mens Rea dalam Perspektif Pragmatik: Kajian Linguistik Forensik terhadap Kejahatan Berbahasa. Puitika, 20(2), 53–73.
Harahap, I. P., & Harahap, A. M. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pelaku Pidana Pencucian Uang pada Aplikasi Trading Binomo yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Konsumen (Studi Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 117/PID.SUS/2022/PT.BTN). JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 2080–2088. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i2.3967
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2020). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana (Revisi). Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Husin, N. C., & Husin, N. S. C. (2024). Plea Bargaining as a Reform in Criminal Procedure Law: An Analysis of Article 199 of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code. Ius Poenale, 5(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v5i1.3486
Husni, H., & Khairat, M. (2024). Penetration of Muamalah Jurisprudence into Indonesian Law. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2), 699–722. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.11116
I Made Ngurah Adi Kusumadewa, Sugiartha, I. N. G., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2022). Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan dalam Pencucian Uang Pada PT. Purnama Kertasindo Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.3.1.4417.178-183
Makmur, K. L. (2024). Why only scrutinise formal finance? Money laundering and informal remittance regulations in Indonesia. Journal of Economic Criminology, 6(1), 100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100111
Mariyanawati, Y. A., & Saleh, M. (2023). Sistem Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Perspektif, 28(3), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v28i3.883
Masnun, Muh. Ali, Prasetio, Dicky Eko, M. (2025). Reconstruction of the Normative Legal Research Paradigm in Responding to Global Challenges: An Epistemological Analysis. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 12(3), 372–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v12i03.74364
Nazzari, M., & Reuter, P. (2025). How Well Does the Money Laundering Control System Work? Crime and Justice, 54(1), 67–152. https://doi.org/10.1086/735665
Nurhani Mouriska, & Ani Purwati. (2025). PERAN FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE (FATF) DALAM HARMONISASI PENANGGULANGAN PENCUCIAN UANG GLOBAL. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(8), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i8.813
Perry, C. (2026). The impact of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 on the pluralisation of policing in England and Wales. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 99(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X251351517
Rodliyah, S. H. S. (2024). Pengantar Hukum Pidana Mengacu Pada KUHP Baru (UU NO.1 Tahun 2023. Sinar Grafika.
Surjanti, S., Maisa, M., Prasetio, D. E., & Dewi, R. S. (2025). Digital Counter Terrorism: Legal Policy for Countering the Spread of Terrorist Content on Social Media. Proceedings of the First International Cyber Law Conference, ICL-C 2023, 11 November 2023, Jakarta, Indonesia, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-11-2023.2351348
Usman, R. (2023). Exploration of nexus between legal liability and corporate fraud: where do business laws and criminology converge? International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 18(1), 232-243–232–243. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756212
Vu Cao, M., & Cao, T. N. A. (2025). Asset Recovery via Non-Conviction based Forfeiture: Rationale for Regulation and Recommendations for Implementation in Vietnam. Law and Development Review, 18(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2024-0058
Wei, H., Mohd-Rashid, R., & Ooi, C. A. (2024). Corruption at country and corporate levels: impacts on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 27(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2023-0102
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dhoni Martien

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













