Accountability of a Notary in Court for Underhand Deed Legalized by a Notary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v20i2.1727Abstract
This research aims to provide an explanation of the responsibility of notary public in the Court of deed under the hands of a notary public, facts in the field show that a Notary is often called to the court to give testimony on the evidence of the trial, namely a letter under the hand legalized by the notary, therefore there needs to be an explanation of the notary's liability for the deed made or legalized. Notary responsibility for deed under legalized hands is heavier than waarmerking, because the parties sign before notary public where notary does not ascertain the content of a deed whether it is wrong or true. Although only legalization but the deed under the hand has the value of being a valid and strong evidence in court so that sometimes dragging a notary witness in the trial. Notary can be subject to criminal sanctions if they are proven to have harmed one of the parties and the Notary can also be subject to civil sanctions in the form of compensation according to what was suffered by the parties.Downloads
References
A., Kohar, Hukum Kenotariatan (Bandung: Alumni, 2004)
Harahap, M.Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian Dan Putusan Pengadilan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013)
Jamil, M, ‘Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Sebagai Aspek Pidana Notaris’, Jurnal Bestuur, 7.2 (2019)
Kie, Tan Thong, Studi Notariat & Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris (Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2011)
Korompot, Moh. Iqra Syabani, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and David Pradhan, ‘The Principle of Equality Before the Law in Indonesian Corruption Case: Is It Relevant?’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1.3 (2021)
Lintang, Loresta Cahyaning, Adriano Martufi, and J.W. Ouwerker, ‘The Alternative Concepts of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia: Legal Comparison with Ireland and Canada’, Bestuur, 9.1 (2021), 13–25
Luthviati, Resti Dian, and Suviwat Jenvitchuwong, ‘Implementation of Halal Product Assurance in the Pharmaceutical Sector in Indonesia’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1.3 (2021)
Mishra, Utkarsh K., and Abhishek Negi, ‘Should Trade Remedies Be Eliminated from WTO: A Response to Tania Voon’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1.3 (2021)
———, ‘Transgender and the Right to Employment in India: Analysing the Trajectories of Discrimination’, Bestuur, 9.1 (2021), 26–33
Notodisoerjo, R. Sugondo, Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1983)
Novikasari, Siti Rahma, Duc Quang Ly, and Kerry Gershaneck, ‘Taxing Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in Yogyakarta: Regulation and Compliance’, Bestuur, 9.1 (2021), 43–52
Pradnyana, Iga Bgs Agastya, ‘Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Kebenaran Akta Di Bawah Tangan Yang Dilegalisasi’ (Universitas Udayana, 2017)
Situmorang, Victor M., and Cormentyna Sitanggang, Gross Akta Dalam Pembuktian Dan Eksekusi (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2005)
Soekanto, Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: UI-Press, 2011)
Sofiana, Ratna, Satria Utama, and Abdur Rohim, ‘The Problems of Halal Certification Regarding Consumer Protection in Malaysia and Indonesia’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1.3 (2021)
Tobing, G.H.S. Lumban, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris (Jakarta: Erlangga, 1992)
Wardhani, Sang Ayu Made Ary Kusuma, ‘Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Legalisasi Akta Dibawah Tangan’, Kerta Dyatmika, 17.2 (2020)
Yussoff, Saidah Fasihah Binti Che, and Rohaida Nordin, ‘Freedom of Expression in Malaysia: Compatibility with the International Human Rights Standard’, Bestuur, 9.1 (2021), 34–42
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Agung Aditya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















