Elimination of Criminal Sanctions in a Forced Defense that Transgresses Limits as a Form of Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.2368Abstract
The aim of the article is to prove that not all criminal acts can be punished. There is a rule that states if someone commits a crime for reasons of compulsion that exceeds the limit, it cannot be punished. The urgency of this research is that justice must be upheld, therefore criminals who commit crimes for reasons of Noodweer Excesses must be protected and given the opportunity for their rights as citizens to get justice in accordance with existing rules.. This research is a type of normative legal research. Normative research is a process to find the rule of law, legal principles, and legal doctrines to answer the legal issues faced. The form of justice can be seen in the fulfillment of the elements of Article 49 Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code regarding forced defense that exceeds the limit: the existence of a great mental shock due to attacks carried out by witnesses, causing the forced defense transgresses the limit. The act of defense is balanced with the attack that is threatened. Severe mental agitation is not only limited to asthenische affecten as in the form of anxiety, fear, or helplessness, but is a sthenische affecten such as anger, wrath or irritation and the consequences of turning self-defense into an attack and excessive or at least using drastical or disproportionate efforts. There is a threat of attack and an ongoing attack or danger is still threatening.
Downloads
References
Anak Agung Gede Agung, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan Begal atas Dasar Pembelaan Terpaksa. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3075.1-7
Arrohim, M. B., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2020). Analysis of Judicial Application of Criminal Penalty Against Notary / Land Deed Officials Conducting Making Crime of the Fake Authentic Deed in State Court of Semarang. Jurnal Akta, 7(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v7i2.7891
Aviram, H. (2011). Packer in Context: Formalism and Fairness in the Due Process Model. Law and Social Inquiry, 36(1), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01230.x
Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts of property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15.
Dignan, J., & Cavadino, M. (2017). Towards a framework for conceptualising and evaluating models of criminal justice from a victim’s perspective. Restorative Justice, 4, 237–266. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315264868- 21
Gumelar, K. (2021). Soul Shaking as Reason for Criminal Abolition: The Dilemma Between Legal Certainty and Justice/Keguncangan Jiwa Sebagai Alasan Penghapus Pidana: Dilema Antara Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan. Journal de Jure, 13(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.12056
Hidayat, B. R., Aprilianda, N., & Endrawati, L. (2022). Legal Implications of Stopping the Investigation Because the Forced Defense (Noodweer) and Emergency Defense Exceed the Limits (Noodweer Excesses). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i2.3405
Leonard, L. J. (2022). Can Restorative Justice Provide a Better Outcome for Participants and Society than the Courts? Laws, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010014
Mahendra, Y., & Tantimin, T. (2022). Premeditated Murder on Ship When Seeking Life Preserves According To Human Rights Perspective. Legal Spirit, 6(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v6i1.3658
Nelken 2012 ch5 Ox Hdbk.pdf. (n.d.).
Problems, S. (2016). Extra-Legal Factors in Chicago ’ s Criminal Courts : Testing the Conflict Model of Criminal Justice Author ( s ): Alan J . Lizotte Published by : Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Study of Social Problems Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/800105 Accessed : 26-06-2016 03 : 10 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use , available at. 25(5), 564–580.
Schachter, O. (1989). Self-Defense and the Rule of Law. American Journal of International Law, 83(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2202738
Suardika, I. K., Agung, A., Duwira, G., & Santosa, H. (n.d.). The Element Of Forced Defense In Giving Reasons For Eliminating Crimes For Victims Of " Begal " According To Article 49 KUHP. 13702–13709.
Susanti, H., Egyprimatama, Wiarti, J., & Heniarti, D. D. (2019). Legal protection efforts for women and children centres against women victims of domestic violence. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(2).
Tsarapatsanis, D. (2021). Human Rights beyond Ideal Morality: The ECHR and Political Judgment. Laws, 10(4), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10040077
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Heni Susanti, Mutia Meduri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













