The Electronic and Transactions Law (EIT Law) as the First Cybercrime Law in Indonesia: An Introduction and Its Implementation

Authors

  • Mahrina Mahrina Universitas Buana Perjuangan Kerawang
  • Joko Sasmito Universitas Buana Perjuangan Kerawang
  • Candra Zonyfar Universitas Buana Perjuangan Kerawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v21i2.2680

Abstract

The cybercrime cases across the country are remaining high. It caused the government decided to create the cybercrime law, including the Indonesian government. The first cybercrime law that created by Indonesian government is the Electronic and Transactions Law (EIT Law) of 2008, and revised in 2016. This paper then provides more comprehensive explanation regarding EIT Law, starting from its creation, substances, enforcement, and even its strengths and weaknesses. By using literature review method, the authors have been conducted research from the previous studies on related topic. Before entering the main discussions, this paper also explains the cybercrime law and policy in Indonesia’s neighboring countries. After that, EIT Law is explained comprehensively. The result shows that background of the creation of EIT Law is the technology and the Internet development that can threaten the Indonesia’s national interests. This law then categorize the types of cybercrime that prohibited in Indonesia. The jurisdiction, the investigation process, and the punishment to cyber criminals also regulated in that law. Furthermore, this paper also explains the strengths and weaknesses of EIT Law. The strengths of EIT Law can be seen in the complexity of the articles that contain within it. Nevertheless, the implementation of this law is still not effective. This is because there are several issues that have to corrected, such as the ambiguity of article contents, lack of cybercrime awareness among the law enforcement officers, difficulties to provide electronic devices, and lack of cyber facilities or infrastructure.

 

Keywords: Cybercrime, Cyberspace, EIT Law, National interest, Technology and internet development

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, G. (2007). The Emergence of Cybercrime and the Legal Response. Journal of Security Education, 2(2),

-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J460v02n02_04

Grabosky, P. (2004). The Global Dimension of Cybercrime. Global Crime, 6(1), 146-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1744057042000297034

Nasi, M., Oksanen, A., Keipi, T., & Rasanen, P. (2015). Cybercrime victimization among young people: a multi-nation study. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 1-8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2015.1046640

Lusthaus, J. (2013). How organised is organised cybercrime? Global Crime, 14(1), 52-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2012.759508

Srivastava, S. T., Das, S., Udo, G. J., & Bagchi, K. (2020). Determinants of Cybercrime Originating within a Nation: A Cross-country Study. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 1-26.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2020.1752084

Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2014). Net Losses: Estimating the Global Cost of Cybercrime. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Anderson, R. C., Barton, C., Bohme R., Clayton, R., van Eeten, M., Levi, M., Moore, T., & Savage, S. (2013). Measuring the Cost of Cybercrime. In R. Bohme (Ed.), The Economics of Information Security and Privacy (pp. 265-300). Springer.

Dupont, D. (2019). Enhancing the effectiveness of cybercrime prevention through policy monitoring. Journal of Crime and Justice, 1-16.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1691855

Naidoo, R. (2020). A multi-level influence model of COVID-19 themed cybercrime. European Journal of Information Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1771222

Daud, A. S. (2013). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi. Lex Crimen, 2(1), 98-112.

Prastini, E. (2018). Kebijakan Kriminal Pemerintah terhadap Kejahatan Dunia Maya (Cyber Crime) di Indonesia. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua, 5(2), 594-610.

Bunga, D. (2019). Politik Hukum Pidana terhadap Penanggulangan Cybercrime. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(1), 1-15.

Liviani, M. R. H. (2020). Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) dan Penanggulangannya dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam, 23(2), 400-426.

Nugraha, R. 2021. Perspektif Hukum Indonesia (Cyberlaw) dalam Penangangan Kasus Cyber di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 11(2), 44-56.

Enggarani, N. S. (2012). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Internet di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 149-168.

Alfian, M. (2017). Penguatan Hukum Cyber Crime di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Kosmik Hukum, 17(2), 148-166.

Ersya, M. P. (2017). Permasalahan Hukum dalam Menanggulangi Cyber Crime di Indonesia. Journal of Moral and Civic Education, 1(1), 50-62.

Putra, B. K. B. (2018). Kebijakan Aplikasi Tindak Pidana Siber (Cyber Crime) di Indonesia. Journal of Law, 1(1), 1-14.

Department of Parliamentary Services. (2019). Cybersecurity, cybercrime and cybersafety: a quick guide to key internet links (Reseach Paper Series, 2018-2019). Parliament of Australia.

https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1819/Quick_Guides/CybersecurityCybercrimeCybersafety

Attorney-General’s Department. (2013). National Plan to Combat Cybercrime. Australian Government. https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/criminal-justice/files/national-plan-combat- cybercrime.pdf

Jayabalan, P., Ibrahim, R., & Manaf, A. A. (2014). Understanding Cybercrime in Malaysia: An Overview. Sains Humanika, 2(2), 109-115

Ibrahim A., Mahmud, N., Isnin, N., Dillah, D. H., & Dillah D. N. F. (2019). Cyber Warfare Impact to National Security – Malaysia Experience. Paper of the FGIC 2nd Conference on Governance and Integrity 2019, KnE Social Sciences, 206-224. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5052

Cyber Security Agency. (2016). Singapore’s Cybersecurity Strategy. The Ministry of Communication and Information ofSingapore.

https://www.csa.gov.sg/news/publications/singapore-cybersecurity-strategy

Cyber Security Agency. (2020). Singapore Cyber Landscape 2020. The Ministry of Communication and Information of,Singapore. https://www.csa.gov.sg/News/Publications/singapore-cyber-landscape-2020

Article 19.(2017)Thailand:Computer Crime Act.

https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38615/Analysis-Thailand-Computer-Crime-Act-31-Jan-17.pdf

Geronimo, L. (). Cybersecurity and Cybercrime: Philippine Perspective. Department of Justice of the Republic of the Philippines.

Li, J. (2021). Cybercrime In The Philippines: A Case Study Of National Security. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 4224-4231.

Luong, H. T., Phan, H. D., Chu, D. V., Nguyen, V. Q., Le, K. T., & Hoang, L. T. (2019). Understanding Cybercrimes in Vietnam: From Leading-Point Provisions to Legislative System and Law Enforcement. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(2), 290-308. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3700724

Asia Centre. (2021). Internet Freedoms Under Threat in Timor-Leste. Submission to the 40th Session of the Universal Periodic Review. https://asiacentre.org/wp- content/uploads/Internet-Freedoms-Under-Threat-in-Timor-Leste.pdf

Anjani., N. H. (2021). Cybersecurity Protection in Indonesia. Policy Brief No. 9, Center for Indonesian Policy Studies.

Muthia, F. R. & Arifin, R. (2019). Kajian Hukum Pidana pada Kasus Kejahatan Mayantara (Cybercrime) dalam Perkara Pencemaran Nama Baik di Indonesia. RESAM Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 21-39.

Rizal, M. & Yani Y. M. (2016). Cybersecurity Policy and Its Implementation in Indonesia. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 4(1), 61-78.

Yulianto, A. (2021). Cybersecurity Policy and Its Implementation in Indonesia. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10/15294/lrrq.v7i1.43191

Rajab, A. (2017). Urgensi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagai Solusi Guna Membangun Etika bagi Pengguna Media. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(4), 463-472.

Permatasari, I. A. & Wijaya, J. H. (2019). Implementation of Electronics Information and Transaction in Completion of the Problem of Hate Speech on Social Media. Jurnal Penelitian Pers dan Komunikasi Pembangunan, 23(1), 27-41.

Jhon, R. M. (2018). Existence of Criminal Law on Dealing Cyber Crime in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 3(1), 25-34.

Setiawan, R. (2013). Efektivitas Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik di Indonesia dalam Aspek Hukum Pidana. Recidive, 2(2), 139-146.

Gulo, A. S., Lasmadi, S., & Nawawi, K. (2020). Cyber Crime dalam Bentuk Phising Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal, 1(2), 68-81.

Saragih, Y. M. & Siahaan, A. P. U. (2016). Cyber Crime Prevention Strategy in Indonesia. SSRG International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(6), 22-26.

Arisandy, Y. O. (2020). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Cyber Crime Hacker. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1(2), 162-169.

Mainake, Y. & Nola, Y. F. Dampak Pasal-Pasal Multitafsir dalam Undang-Undang tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis, 12(16), 1-6.

Sumadi, H. (2015). Kendala dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Penipuan Transaksi Elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, 33(2), 175-203.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-08