The Lex Favor Reo Principle After New Criminal Code: A Corrective Justice’s Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.2997Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the existence and implications of the lex favor reo principle after the ratification of the new Criminal Code in relation to aspects of corrective justice. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study show that the existence of the lex favor reo principle after the ratification of the new Criminal Code, namely as formulated in Article 3 juncto Article 618 of the new Criminal Code, the existence and applicability of the lex favor reo principle can be immediately enforced. The implication of the lex favor reo principle in optimizing aspects of corrective justice after the ratification of the new Criminal Code is that the implementation of the lex favor reo principle has implications for the existence of criminal sanctions experienced by defendants in the old Criminal Code. Suggestions in this study are that for law enforcement officials, special attention is needed when trying a crime, especially by first paying attention to the lex favor reo principle to see which sanctions are more profitable for the accused.Downloads
References
Agus, M. A., & Susanto, A. (2021). The Optimization of the Role of Correctional Centers in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(3), 369. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.v21.369-384
Allcock, M. (2019). A corrective justice justification for considering the response of the hypothetical person of an “ ordinary level of susceptibility ” when assessing reasonable foreseeability in cases involving negligently inflicted psychiatric injury. Tort Law Review, 26(1), 62.
Bagaskara, M. (2023). Ferdy Sambo Dinilai Tak Bisa Lolos dari Hukuman Mati Meski Ada KUHP Baru (p. 1). nasional.tempo.co.
Bateman, G. G. (2019). The Ough To Be a Law: Gustav Radbruch, Lon L. Fuller, and H.L.A. Hart on The Choice Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism. The Journal Jurisprudence, 271(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi042
Bustomi. (2021). The Legality Principle Application in Indonesian Criminal Law System. Nurani Hukum, 4(2), 31.
Disantara, F. P., Naftali, S. A., Putra, R. Y. A., Irmayati, D., & Rahmawati, G. (2022). Enigma Pemberantasan Korupsi di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 5(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4135
Fardiansyah, A. I. (2021). Why Indonesia Maintain Capital Punishment? Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no1.1904
Halim, A., Sudarsono, S., Negara, T. A. S., & Hadi, H. R. (2020). The Urgency for the Implementation of Transition Norm “Lex Favor Reo” in the Imposition of Tax Sanction in Indonesia. Open Journal for Legal Studies, 3(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0302.07153h
Hardianto, M. (2022). Perubahan Undang-Undang Oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Kacamata Pasal 1 Ayat (2) Kuhp. Indonesia Criminal Law Review, 1(2), 77.
Helmalia Cahyani, Intan Nurul Firdaus, Julia Elisabeth, F. I. (2022). Kebijakan Pasal-Pasal Kontroversial Dalam RUU KUHP Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Dinamika Sosial Kultur Masyarakat Indonesia. Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science, 2(2), 85.
I Dewa Gede Atmadja. (2021). Legal Ideology on Social Justice Perspective. Journal Equity of Law and Governance, 1(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.55637/elg.1.2.4345.158-163
I Gusti Ngurah Bayu Pradiva, D. R. S. H. (2022). Perluasan Asas Legalitas Dalam Rkuhp Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 10(8), 1766–1778.
Intan Audya, Jeanne D.N Manikb, W. (2021). Kajian hukum asas retroaktif dalam kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan. Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 171–185.
Khalimy, A. (2020). Makna Aturan Peralihan sebagai Politik Hukum RUU KUHP (Transformasi dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional). Hukum Progresif, 8(2), 124.
Kryvoi, Y., & Matos, S. (2021). Non-Retroactivity as a General Principle of Law. Utrecht Law Review, 17(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.36633/ULR.604
Kurniawan, I. G. A. (2022). The Reconstruction of Subjectum Litis in Term of Reflections on Constitutional Dissolution of Political Parties. Jurnal Akta, 9(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i1.20970
Leider, R. (2021). The Modern Common Law of Crime. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 111(2), 412–413.
Naibaho, N. (2021). Rethinking the ultimum remedium principle to support justice and strong law enforcement institutions in environmental crimes. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1–10.
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research In Indonesia: Its Origins And Approaches. ACLJ, 4(1), 5.
Nurisman, E. (2022). Questioning The Position Of Corruption Offenses In The Rkuhp. Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 139.
Pollock, J. M. (2020). Criminal Law. Taylor & Francis.
Ripstein, A. (2020). Corrective justice. In Research Handbook on Private Law Theory (p. 258). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Rochaeti, N., Hafidh, M., Rozah, U., & Park, J. (2023). A Restorative Justice System in Indonesia : A Close View from the Indigenous Peoples ’ Practices. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1919.pp87-104
Sahyana, Y. (2020). Pembangunan Hukum Pidana; Pluralisme Hukum dalam RKUHP. Konstituen, 2(1), 47–61.
Sayulina, R., & Efendi, R. (2022). The Criminal Law Reform On Completion Of Samenleven In Indonesia. Agenda, 4(1), 42–53.
Srirejeki, J. S., & Master. (2022). Formulation of Restorative Justice Concept in Criminal Law Reform. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(1), 159–165.
Sudarwanto, A. S., & Kharisma, D. B. B. (2021). Comparative study of personal data protection regulations in Indonesia, Hong Kong and Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime, 10, 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2021-0193
Suharyo, S. (2021). The Prospect of the Existence of National Criminal Code in a Democratic State in Indonesia during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(3), 285. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.v21.285-298
Supardin, & Syatar, A. (2021). Adultery Criminalization Spirit in Islamic Criminal Law: Alternatives in Indonesia’s Positive Legal System Reform. Samarah, 5(2), 913–927. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.9353
Thornton, F. (2021). Of Harm, Culprits and Rectification: Obtaining Corrective Justice for Climate Change Displacement. Transnational Environmental Law, 10(1), 17.
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2014). Dari Hukum Kolonial Ke Hukum Nasional. HuMA, Van Vollenhoven Institute, KITLV, Epistema Institute.
Wirabakti, M. Z., & Rochaeti, N. (2022). A Juridical Analysis of the Comparison of Legality Principle in the Indonesian Criminal Code (WvS) and the Draft of New Indonesian Criminal Code (National Criminal Code). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 3030–3040.
Yuli Asmara Triputra, R. H. (2022). Pelaksanaan Asas Hukum Retroaktif Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Pidana Materill. Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda, 28(1), 12.
Zainal Arifin Mochtar, E. O. S. H. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas, dan Filsafat Hukum (1st ed.).
.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Henny Saida Flora, Fradhana Putra Disantara, Mac Thi Hoai Thuong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
