Liability Of A Carrier Based On Sea Carriage Document In Indonesia (A Way Forward To E-Document)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v19i2.2999Abstract
Maritime Document tin Indonesian law refers to the regulations of the Indonesian Commercial Code and International Conventions such as The Hague Rules in 1928 and The Hague Visby Rules of 1968. As an essential document in international trade, the conventions are also very influential. One of the latest conventions is the U.N. Convention on Contract for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, which was signed in Rotterdam in 2009 (Rotterdam Rules). The problem arises when until now Indonesian Government is not a party nor ratified of those Convention and for the e-document Indonesia only apply e-Bill of Lading (e-B/L). The research method is a legal analysis of the key provision of the relevant law upon Maritime Law. The findings indicated that Maritime Documents in Indonesia, are divided into charter agreement and bill of lading agreement. It also find that E-B/L Bill is not suitable in Common nor Civil law jurisdiction.Downloads
References
Aas, B., Halskau Sr, Ø., & Wallace, S. W. (2009). The role of supply vessels in offshore logistics. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 11(3), 302-325.
Abdulrahim, H. M. (1994). Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of or Damage to Goods under the Hague Rules, Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, Compared with His Liability as an Operator under the Relevant Rules of the International Multimodal Transport Convention. University of Glasgow (United Kingdom).
Al-Kabban, R. A. (1988). The effect of deviation occurring in the course of a maritime voyage on the liability of the carrier under the Hague/Visby rules and Hamburg rules, in relation to certain countries (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow).
Aladwani, T. (2015). A comparative study of the obligation of due diligence to provide a seaworthy vessel under the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules and the Rotterdam Rules.
Cheng, C. J., & Cheng, J. (Eds.). (1990). Basic documents on international trade law. BRILL.
Clift, J. (1999). Electronic Commerce: The UNCITRAL Model Law and Electronic Equivalents to Traditional Bills of Lading. Int'l Bus. Law., 27, 311.
Gaskell, N., Asariotis, R., & Baatz, Y. (2017). Bills of lading: law and contracts. Routledge.
Harris, T. (2008). Welfare aspects of the long distance transportation of animals–the Animal Transportation Association. Veterinaria Italiana, 44(1), 31-41.
Heiko Giermann. (2004). The evidentiary value of bills of lading and estoppel (Vol. 15). LIT Verlag Münster.
Hesketh, D. (2010). Weaknesses in the supply chain: who packed the box. World Customs Journal, 4(2), 3-20.
Hollnagel, E. (2016). Barriers and accident prevention. Routledge.
Indira Carr ,International Trade Law,London, Routledge-Cavendish,2011,p. 305
Jnr, F. A. O. (2016). Carriers’ Liability in Contracts for the Carriage of Goods by Sea: Is there a Justification for the Hamburg and Rotterdam Rules?. Business Law Review, 37(6).
Kroon, L., & Vrijens, G. (1995). Returnable containers: an example of reverse logistics. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management.
Krumwiede, D. W., & Sheu, C. (2002). A model for reverse logistics entry by third-party providers. Omega, 30(5), 325-333.
Lee, E. S. (2002). The Changing Liability System of Sea Carriers and Maritime Insurance: Focusing on the Enforcement of the Hamburg Rules. Transnat'l Law., 15, 241.
LEV, D. N. S. (2006). The state and law reform in Indonesia. In Law reform in developing and transitional states (pp. 263-294). Routledge.
Low, R. (2000). Replacing the paper bill of lading with an electronic bill of lading: problems and possible solutions. Int'l. Trade & Bus. L. Ann., 5, 159.
Margetson, N. J. (2008). The system of liability of articles III and IV of the Hague (Visby) Rules. Uitgeverij Paris.
Mavlanova, T., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Koufaris, M. (2012). Signaling theory and information asymmetry in online commerce. Information & management, 49(5), 240-247.
Mitchelhill, A. (2013). Bills of lading: law and practice. Springer.
Rhidian Thomas,The Modern Law of Marine Insurance,London,Informa , 2009,p. .5
Schmitz, T. (2011). The bill of lading as a document of title. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy.
Smeele, F. (2010). The maritime performing party in the Rotterdam Rules 2009. EJCCL, 2, 72.
Sturley, M. F. (1991). The history of COGSA and the Hague Rules. J. Mar. L. & Com., 22, 1.
Sturley, M. F. (1986). International uniform laws in national courts: The influence of domestic laws in conflicts of interpretation. Va. J. Int'l L., 27, 729.
Pejovic, C. (2015). Clean bill of lading in contract of carriage and documentary credit: When clean may not be clean. Penn St. JL & Int'l Aff., 4, 127.
Wanigasekera, A. (2011). Comparison of Hague-Visby and Hamburg Rules.
Waters, C. A. (1990). The Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses in Maritime Bills of Lading: An Update. Tul. Mar. LJ, 15, 29.
Zhang, Y., Meng, Q., & Zhang, L. (2016). Is the Northern Sea Route attractive to shipping companies? Some insights from recent ship traffic data. Marine Policy, 73, 53-60.
Zhao, L. (2013). Retla clause on bill of lading. Lloyd's Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly, 2013, 426-432.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Irma Rachmawati Maruf, T. Subarsyah, Ahmad Ridwan Tentowi, Valda Zahira Sidqy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
