INTEGRITY ZONE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC POLICY AS LEGAL MEASURES FOR CORRUPTION PREVENTION AT UIN SALATIGA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.3182Abstract
The aims of this study are 1) to find out what factors have caused the failure and success of the construction of the Integrity Zone at IAIN Salatiga in achieving the title of a Corruption-free Region; 2) To find out the Integrity Zone development policy in an effort to prevent corruption at IAIN Salatiga. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method. The stages that the researcher will go through include: the data reduction stage, data presentation, and conclusion drawing (verification). The results of the research are: 1) The most significant cause of failure is due to budget refocusing caused by the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, which results in sudden budget revisions or the emergence of rules that require changing the program of activities that have been set at the beginning; 2) There are 6 aspects of success in the development of the Integrity zone at IAIN Salatiga including change management, management arrangements, management system arrangements, strengthening supervision, strengthening the quality of public services and making one-stop integrated services; 3) With the establishment of an integrity zone policy at IAIN Salatiga, it can make agents of change in work units, because ZI is not only a matter of orderly administration but also how to work units can serve the community.Downloads
References
Al Rosyid, Syahron dkk. (2022). MPOT: Implementasi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Pekalongan: Nasya Expanding Management.
Beniharmoni, dkk. (2022). Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Budiman, Maman. “Tatangan Dan Isu Strategis Gerakan Antikorupsi Terkini.” Syntax Idea 3, no. 10 (2021): 2155–70.
Dadang Hartanto, Nasrullah Hidayat. Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Melayani : Best Practice. Medan: Universitas Medan Area Press, 2021.
Daulay, Musnar Indra, dkk. (2022). Pendidikan Antikorupsi (Model Pemberantasan Korupsi). Bandung: Media Sains Indonesia.
Dirwan, R A. “Analisis Tata Kelola (Manajemen) Pemerintahan Dari Perspektif Good Governance.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–15.
Dwiyanto, Agus. (2021) Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UGM Press
Gani, Yopik. “Implementasi Pembangunan Zona Integritas Dalam Pelayanan Publik Polri.” Jurnal ILMU KEPOLISIAN 13, no. 2 (2019): 138–47.
Ginting, Rosalina, and Titik Haryati. “Reformasi Birokrasi Publik Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS I, no. 2 (2011): 27–41.
Hamson, Zulkarnain & Makkah. (2021). Membedah Anatomi Korupsi. Pekalongan: Nasya Expanding Management.
Iswandari, Bunga Asoka. “Jaminan Atas Pemenuhan Hak Keamanan Data Pribadi Dalam Penyelenggaraan E-Government Guna Mewujudkan Good Governance.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 28, no. 1 (2021): 115–38. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss1.art6.
Kurniati, Paramita Nur, and Bernardus Yuliarto Nugroho. “Urgensi Pelaksanaan Sistem Cashless Government Dalam Membangun Birokrasi Yang Transparan Dan Akuntabel The Urgency of the Implementation of the Cashless Government System in Building a Transparent and Accountable Bureaucracy.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) 9, no. 2 (2019): 136–50.
Kuswanto, dkk. (2022). Pendidikan Budaya Anti Korupsi (PBAK). Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Moloeng, Lexy J. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Prastowo, Andi. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Rancangan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Radiansyah, Rifi Rivani. “Reformasi Birokrasi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Kerangka Otonomi Daerah.” Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik 2, no. 1 (2020): 80–93.
Rahman, Hardiyanto. “Reformasi Birokrasi : Korupsi Dalam Birokrasi Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah 14, no. 1 (2020): 135–61.
Retnowati, Yuni. “Konsep Keadilan Sosial Dalam Bingkai Sila Kelima Pancasila (The Concept Of Social Justice Within The Fifth Principle Framework Of Pancasila).” Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, Dan Kebijakan 18, no. 1 (2014): 28–38.
Rosa, Feny dkk. (2022). MPOT: Implementasi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Pekalongan: Nasya Expanding Management.
Santoso, Bagus Teguh. “Keputusan Fiktif Positif Sebagai Bentuk Reformasi Birokrasi Berdasarkan Prinsip Good Governance/Fictive Positive Decision As A Form Of Bureaucratic Reform Based On The Good Governance Principles.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 1, no. 1 (2018): 119–44.
Satya, Venti Eka. “Strategi Indonesia Menghadapi Industri 4.0.” INFO Singkat, Bidang Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Dan Strategis X, no. 09 (2018): 19–24.
Sirin, Ahmad. “Strategi Implementasi Pembangunan Zona Integritas Pada Kantor Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Pekalongan.” Jurnal Edutrained: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan 5, no. 2 (2021): 148–63.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung:Alfabeta.
Sukrisno, Subur. (2021). Masalah Korupsi dan Pencegahannya di Indonesia Masa Kini. Bogor: IPB Press.
Yunas, Novy Setia. “Kepemimpinan Dan Masa Depan Reformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia.” DIMENSI-Journal of Sociology 9, no. 2 (2016): 103–14.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ali Mahrus, Desiderius priyo sudibyo, Asal wahyuni erlin mulyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
