Legal Certainty In The Role Of The DPRD Functions In Implementing The Right Of Interpelation Based On Constituonal Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.3207Abstract
The Regional People's Legislative Council (DPRD) is a legislative institution which is an element of the constitutional structure in our country. This institution functions as a policy initiator, policy supervisor, and works together with the executive to develop joint policies for the welfare of the people. DPRD has many rights in carrying out its duties and functions, one of the many rights is the right of interpellation. The right of interpellation is the right of the DPRD to request information from the government regarding strategic policies that have an impact on social life which certainly affects the development of the nation. The right of interpellation is the right of the DPR/DPRD to ask the government for information regarding important and strategic policies that have an impact on people's lives and the dynamics of the nation. that in forming an Act the DPR cannot proceed alone without the approval of the President. Both of them, both the DPR and the President must agree, the DPR cannot agree but the President does not agree. The two must go hand in hand to agree together.
Downloads
References
Albert H Y Chen, 2000. “The Interpretation of the Basic Law-Common Law and Mainland Chinese Perspective”, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Journal Ltd.
Bisariyadi, Intan Permata Putri, dkk, “Penafsiran Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar”, Laporan Hasil Penelitian, Pusat Penelitian, Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (P4TIK) Daria Sartori, 2014, “The Lex Certa Principle From the Italian Constitution to the European Convention on Human Rights”, Desertasi, University of Trento, Italia
Depri Liber Sonata, 2014. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum”, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No.1 Januari-Maret 2014
Dian Agung Wicaksono dkk, Hubungan Personalitas Hakim Konstitusi terhadap Praktik Judicial Activism di Mahkamah Konstitusi, (Studi Terhadap Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi 2003-2017), Laporan Penelitian, Kerjasama FH UGM dan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Enrico Simanjuntak, 2018. “Praktik Yurisprudensi dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Sistem Civil Law”, dalam Kumpulan Tulisan Pilihan Pembaruan Peradilan, Indonesian Judicial Reform Forum
Faiz Rahman dan Dian Agung Wicaksono, 2016. “Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.3 No 2, Juni 2016
Fajar Laksono Soeroso dkk, “Masyarakat Adat Tanpa Kriminalisasi (Studi Implementasi Putusan No 95/PUU-XII/2014 di Masyarakat Adat Perkasa, Sumbawa, NTB)”, Laporan Hasil Penelitian, Pusat Penelitian, Pengkajian dan Penggelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (P4TIK)
Fence M Wantu dalam R Tony Prayogo, 2016. “Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 tahun 2011 tentang Hak Uji Materiil dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/PMK/2005 tentang Pedoman Beracara dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol.13 No. 02-Juni 2016
Francis J Moot III. “The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry Based on The Work of Gadamer, Habermas, and Ricoeur”, Boston University Law Review, Vol.68: 523
Frank B Cross dan Stefanie Lindquist, 2006, “The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism”, Minnesota Law Review, October 2006
Hwian Christianto, “Pembaharuan Makna Asas Legalitas”, Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, Tahun 39 No. 3, Juli-September Ibnu Sina Chandranegara, 2014. “Penafsiran Hakim atas Undang-Undang yang Mengubah Undang-Undang Dasar”, Paper, Jakarta: Conference on Constitutional Rights
Imam Nasima, 2018. “Sistem Hukum Kontinental dan Wibawa Putusan Hakim: Sebuah Pengantar”, dalam Kumpulan Tulisan Pilihan Pembaruan Peradilan, Indonesian Judicial Reform Forum
Keenan D Kmiec, “The Origin and Current Meaning of Judicial Activism”, 92 California Law Review, 2004
Makhamah Konstitusi RI, Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Konstitusional Bersyarat dan Memuat Norma Baru, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2014
, Laporan tahunan Mahkamah Konstitusi 2018, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2019
Mark Ellis, “Toward A Common Ground Definition of The Rule of Law Incorporarting Substantive Principles of Justice”, University of Pittsburgh Law Review 191,
Mary Garvey Algero, 2005. “The Source of Law and the Value of Precedent: A Comparative and Empirical Study of a Civil Law State in a Common Law Nation”, Louisiana Law Review, Vol 65, No.2.
Mei Susanto, 2017. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Negative Budgeter dalam Pengujian UU Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vo 14, No. 4, Desember 2017
Michael Faure, Morag Goodwin, 2014. “The Regulator’s Dilemma Caugth Between The Need For Flexibility & The Demands of Foreseeability. Reassessing the Lex Certa Principle”, Albany Law Journal, Vo; 24.2.
Mohammad Mahrus Ali, 2015. “Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol 12 No 1, Maret 2015
Muchamad Ali Safaat, Aan Eko Widiarto, dkk. 2017. “Pola Penafsiran Konstitusi Periode 2003-2008 dan 2009-2013”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.14, Nomor 2
Pan Mohammad Faiz, 2016, “Dimensi Judicial activism dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 13, Nomor 2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anwar - Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
