Istinbath Method in Strengthening Ultra Qui Judicial Principles in Judicial Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3319Abstract
the method of Istinbath is necessary to support the principle of Ultra Qui Judicat, enabling judges to possess moral characteristics in considering not only knowledge and reason but also Islamic law when making legal decisions. Overall, the significance of the Istinbath method in supporting the principle of Ultra Qui Judicat is paramount, especially in addressing contemporary and empirical issues not governed by legislative regulations. The aim of this research are : explain the concept of Istinbath and Ultra Qui Judicat influence the judge's decisions and the application of the Istinbath method used to reinforce the principle of Ultra Qui Judicat to judicial decisions. The result shows that The method of Istinbath is closely related to the principle of Ultra Qui Judicat since both share the same objective of achieving justice. In practice, judges can use the method of Istinbath to interpret the law and apply the principle of Ultra Qui Judicat in criminal cases. The principle of Ultra Qui Judicat and the method of Istinbath are essential instruments for judges in the criminal justice system to achieve justice in decision-makingDownloads
References
Book and Journal
David P. Findler, “The Future of the World Health Organization: What Role for International Law”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol.31, No.5, 1998.
David P. Findler,” Global Health Governance: Overview of the Role of International Law in Protecting and Promoting Global Public Health”, Discussion Paper, WHO, Geneva, 2002.
Jacob Katz Cogan et.all, The Oxford Handbook of International Organization, Oxford University Press, UK, 2016.
Jonas Tallberg, et.all., The Performance of International Organizations: An Output-Based Approach, General Conference of the ECPR, 2015.
Jose E. Alvarez, “International Organization: Then and Now”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 100:324, 2006.
………., International organizations as law-makers, Oxford, OUP, 2006.
Kristina Duagirdas, “How and Why International Law Binds International Organization”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol.57, No.2, 2016.
Pedro A. Viilareal, “Pandemic Declaration of the World Health Organization as an Exercise of International Public Authority: The Possible Legal Answers to Frictions Between Legitimacies”, Goetingen Journal of International Law, Vol.7, No.1, 2016.
Pedro A. “Villarreal, Pendemic: Building A Legal Concept For the Future”, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 20, 2020.
Weinian Hu, Compulsory Licensing and Access to Future Covid-19 Vaccines, CEPS Research Report, 2020.
Legal Instruments
WHO Constitution
International Health Regulations, 2005
World Health Organization, Pandemic Influenza Risk Management, WHO, Geneva, 2017
Other Sources
https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020, accessed on April 20, 2020, at 02.00 wib
Pedro A. Villarreal, The (not-so) Hard Side of the IHR: Breaks of Legal Obligations, Global Health Law Groningen, Blog, 2020. Accessed via website https://www.rug.nl/rechten/onderzoek/expertisecentra/ghlg/blog/the-not-so-hard-side-of-the-ihr-breaches-of-legal-obligations-26-02-2020? lang=enon 22/04/2022 at 11.30 WIB.
WHO Time Line, Accessed via https://www.who.int/news/item/29-06-2020-covidtime
line on 22/04/2022 at 11.30 WIB
.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Suwitno Yutye Imran, Apripari Apripari, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, Erifendi Churniawan, Aristama Mega Jaya, Nurikah Nurikah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
