Legal Position of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali in the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua

Maria Yeti Andrias; Yulianus P Aituru

doi:10.31941/pj.v20i1.3385

Authors

Maria Yeti Andrias Faculty of Law, Yapis University, Papua, Indonesia
Yulianus P Aituru Faculty of Law, Yapis University, Papua, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v20i1.3385

Abstract

This magazine discusses the Legal Position of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali within the Implementation of Special Autonomy within the Regions, with a focus on case research in Papua. This abstract presents a summary of the contents of the Journal, which includes history troubles, hassle system, goals, studies methods, effects of analysis, and conclusions.Background This journal illustrates the importance of special autonomy as a form of unique answer for regions with unique traits and troubles. The components of the hassle includes questions about the meaning of unique autonomy, the records of the implementation of special autonomy in Papua, in addition to the feature and scope of this unique autonomy.The reason of this magazine is to analyze the criminal role of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali in the implementation of special autonomy, and to understand the function of unique and trendy laws and rules inside the context of unique autonomy.The studies technique used is literature observe by using amassing facts from diverse reliable assets together with laws, selections of the Constitutional Court, and related scientific journals.The effects of the evaluation screen that the principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali is the important thing in resolving felony conflicts between special autonomy policies and national popular regulations. The application of Lex Specialis offers priority to important policies that observe in the region, as a result imparting extra authority according to the distinctiveness and desires of the place.Conclusion this journal emphasizes the significance of increasing felony attention in society to assist the implementation of unique autonomy. Improving the prison device and strengthening the judiciary are also important in order that unique autonomy can run well and provide most desirable benefits for the area people. Community collaboration and involvement also are critical elements within the achievement of unique autonomy, in order that the network feels they have an energetic role in development and choice-making in their region

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Book

Aditya, R. (2020). Improving Community Welfare Through the Aceh Special Autonomy Program. Journal of Social Welfare, 17(2), 89-102.

Adnan, M. (2023). The Impact of the Implementation of Special Autonomy on Increasing the Economy in Papua. Journal of Development Economics, 12(1), 45-58.

Agustina, NL, & Wicaksana, AI (2020). The Role of Regional Government in the Implementation of Papua's Special Autonomy. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 24(2), 108-120.

Anwar, MK (2019). Aceh Special Autonomy in Economic and Social Perspective. Journal of Scientific Studies, 16(2), 98-107.

Aziz, A. (2021). Implications of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Infrastructure Development in Papua. Journal of Economics and Business, 20(1), 56-68.

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Statistics for Papua 2022. Jayapura: Central Bureau of Statistics for Papua Province.

Dirgantara, P. (2019). Community Perspectives on the Implementation of Special Autonomy in Papua. Journal of Social Studies, 15(2), 98-110.

Gultom, S. (2019). Special Autonomy in Papua: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Political and Government Studies, 7(2), 120-135.

Hasibuan, SA (2018). Juridical Review of the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua. Journal of Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism, 5(2), 78-92.

Heryanto, YD (2017). Papua Special Autonomy: Central Policy and Regional Challenges. Journal of Political and Government Studies, 5(1), 23-38.

Iskandar, D., & Pramono, B. (2019). Analysis of the Implementation of Aceh's Special Autonomy in the Perspective of Constitutional Law. Indonesian Journal of Constitution and Constitutionalism, 6(2), 89-104.

Ministry of Internal Affairs. (2019). Guidelines for Drafting Regional Regulations on Special Autonomy for Papua. Jakarta: Ministry of Home Affairs.

Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Evaluation Report on the Implementation of Special Autonomy in Papua. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance.

Kusuma, I. (2016). Community Participation in Aceh Special Autonomy Decision Making. Journal of Politics and Government Studies, 4(2), 134-147.

Mahfud, MD (2003). Unitary State Autonomy and Challenges. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Nugroho, H. (2018). Position of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali in Indonesian Constitutional Law. Journal of the Constitution, 5(1), 34-50.

Nurdin, A. (2022). Horizontal Conflict in the Implementation of Aceh's Special Autonomy. Journal of Conflict and Peace Studies, 8(2), 78-92.

Pranoto, S. (2021). Dynamics of Special Autonomy Law in Papua: Challenges and Opportunities Towards Sustainable Development. Journal of Law & Development, 28(2), 126-140.

Pamungkas, A. (2017). The Dynamics of Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua: Challenges and Obstacles. Journal of Political and Government Studies, 5(1), 45-60.

Rahman, A. (2022). Implementation of Special Autonomy in Border Areas: Case Study of Papua Province. Journal of Governance Science, 10(2), 89-102.

Rumbiak, E. (2020). Public Participation in Papua Special Autonomy Decision Making. Journal of Public Administration, 6(1), 23-37.

Sardjono, AB (2018). Community Empowerment in the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua. Journal of Civil Society Empowerment, 2(2), 120-135.

Simarmata, AC (2017). Papua's Special Autonomy Policy: Between Demands and Constraints. Journal of Politics and Government Studies, 5(2), 56-70.

Sugianto, AB (2018). Legal Analysis of the Implementation of Special Autonomy in Papua. Journal of Law & Society, 5(1), 34-48.

Sulaiman, A. (2017). History and Development of Special Autonomy for Papua. Journal of Governance Studies, 2(1), 1-18.

Cape, R. (2021). Evaluation of the Implementation of Special Autonomy in Aceh and Papua: The Perspective of the Central Government. Journal of Governance Studies, 19(1), 45-60.

Widodo, J. (2015). Identity Politics and the Struggle for Special Autonomy for Papua. Journal of Governance Studies, 6(1), 1-18.

Yudhoyono, SB (2014). Strengthening Papua's Special Autonomy for the Welfare of the Papuan People and Unity of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Yuliawan, R., & Kusuma, H. (2016). Regional Government and Community Collaboration in the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua. Journal of Public Administration, 2(2), 98-112.

Constitution:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law Number 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2001 Number 50.

Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2006 Number 73.

Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Legislation.

Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 244.

Government Regulation Number 1 of 2005 concerning the Implementation of Regional Government in Papua Province.

Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 64 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Special Autonomy for Papua.

Papua Provincial Government. (2022). Papua Province Regional Medium Term Development Plan 2022-2027. Jayapura: Government of the Province of Papua.

Websites:

Online Law. "Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali: Definition and Case Examples". Retrieved July 20, 2023, fromhttps://www.Hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/review/lt5cd94457b341f/lex-specialis-derogat-legi-generali-pengertian-dan-exemplary-case/

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision Number 130/PUU-X/2012 concerning Deviations from Special Arrangements in the Aceh Special Autonomy Law. Retrieved July 22, 2023, fromhttps://www.mkri.id/public/content/puu-decision/decision_pkpuu_130_2012.pdf

https://nasional.okezone.com/read/2022/09/25/337/2674716/5-Jadi-dana-otsus-papua-rp1-000-trillion-not-includes-for-infrastructure. Retrieved July 30, 2023.

https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-56481234. Retrieved July 30, 2023.

https://fwi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/final-Factsheet-Infrastruktur-Papua-2.pdf. Retrieved July 30, 2023.

https://tirto.id/pemekaran-papua-dalam-uu-otsus-baru-berpotential-mengancam-oap-ghTa. Retrieved July 30, 2023.

https://www. Hukumonline.com/klinik/a/3-asas- Hukum--ilex-superior-i--ilex-specialis-i--dan-ilex-posterior-i-bebert-exemplary-cl6806. Retrieved July 30, 2023.

https://www. Hukumonline.com/klinik/a/penjuangan-asas-ilex-superior-derogat-legi-inferiori-i-dan-bedanya-dengan-ilex-specialis-i-lt51375eaee3c7d. Retrieved July 30, 2023.

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex_specialis_derogat_legi_generali. Retrieved July 30