Rechtsvacuum In The Conviction Of The Criminal Act Of Bribery Assistance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v20i2.3418Abstract
Bribery assistance perpetrators have an essential function in a series of incidents of bribery. It has juridical consequences regarding the need for a clear and definite conviction for them. The ambiguity of Article 15 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, given the position of perpetrators of bribery assistance, has had a major impact on the rechtsvacuum in the criminal justice system on bribery crimes. Based on the study of this normative method article, it was found that criminalization in bribery cases, in fact, does not only include active and passive perpetrators of bribery, but the existence of perpetrators of bribery assistance cannot be ruled out either. There is the fact that the provision for bribery assistance in Article 15 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes has resulted in a rechtsvacuum in terms of conviction in bribery cases. This situation has clearly resulted in uncertainty regarding the criminal sanction imposition for bribery assistance perpetrators.
Downloads
References
Mahrus Ali, 2011, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Sugiono, 2009, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung
Aidul Fitriciada Azhari, Negara Hukum Indonesia: Dekolonisasi dan Rekonstruksi Tradisi, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Volume 19, Number 4, October 2012
Haposan Siallagan, “Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum di Indonesia”, Jurnal Sosiohumaniora, Volume 18, Number 2, July 2016
Hisar Sitohang, Martono Anggusti, Uton Utomo, Analisis Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dengan Penyalagunaan Jabatan Dalam Bentuk Penyuapan Aktif (Studi Putusan Nomor : 195/Pid.Sus/Tpk/2017/Pn Sby), Patik, Volume 07 Number 02
Janpatar Simamora, Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum dalam Perspektif Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 14, Number 3, September 2014
M Zulfikar Adhiguna, Ifahdah Pratama Haspsari, dan Dodi Jaya Wardana, Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Suap Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Melibatkan Sektor Swasta, Jurnal Justisia, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2022
Muchamad Iksan, Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana: Studi Komparatif Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam (Jinayah), Jurnal Serambi Hukum, Volume 11, Number 1, 2017
Case Number 76/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN Jkt.Pst, accessed via https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/534d233fce34c2effc0ce2fc2fd1c11a.html, on May 12, 2022.
Case Number 45/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN.Bgl, accessed via https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/534d233fce34c2effc0ce2fc2fd1c11a.html, on May 12, 2022.
Case Number 45/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN.Bgl, accessed via https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/534d233fce34c2effc0ce2fc2fd1c11a.html, on May 12, 2022
Agustinus Edy Kristianto, http://korupsi.vivanews.com/news/read/28525- suap_korupsi_tanpa_akhir_1tgl., downloaded on Saturday, June 16, 2019
Mahkamah Agung, Putusan-Putusan Terkait Pelaku Pembantuan Suap, accessed via https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html, on April 12, 2023
https://yurismuda.com/perbedaan-penyertaan-dan-pembantuan-dalam-tindak-pidana/, accessed on May 12, 2023
https://selma.ub.ac.id/program-doktor-ilmu-hukum-2/, accessed on May 12, 2023
https://pdih.unissula.ac.id/, accessed on May 12, 2023
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Hadi Prayitno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
