THE PARADIGM OF LAW AS A SOCIAL ENGINEERING IN THE EXISTENCE OF CRYPTO ASSET MONITORING: WHAT AND HOW?

Authors

  • Handityo Basworo Faculty of Law, University of Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3482

Abstract

The development of transactions through crypto assets is one of the practices carried out in the digital business world. The existence of transactions through crypto assets makes the state regulate and supervise crypto assets. One of the legal policies carried out by the state is to supervise crypto asset transactions by the OJK institution. This study aims to answer two legal issues, namely the implications of regulating crypto asset supervision after the passing of the Law No. 4 of 2023 on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening (PPSK Law) and the orientation of crypto asset supervision after the passing of the PPSK Law from a law perspective as a tool of social engineering. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study confirm that the implications of supervising crypto assets after that is to make the existence and position of CoFTRA as a supervisor of transactions using crypto assets increasingly lead to ambiguity because the authority regarding the supervision of crypto assets becomes the authority of the OJK. The orientation of oversight of crypto assets in the perspective of law as a social engineering can be seen that the substance of oversight of crypto assets by the OJK aims to carry out community engineering, namely in the form of future efforts so that the community can optimize crypto asset transactions to increase the strengthening of national finance and to give the public a sense of security for transactions crypto assets carried out, the state took the initiative to formulate oversight of crypto assets by OJK because OJK is considered the right and appropriate institution in efforts to regulate and supervise crypto asset transactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afani, Y., & Tambunan, M. R. U. D. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Pemajakan atas Tansaksi Perdagangan Aset Kripto di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 9(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.2022.009.02.24

Alhidami Wildan, Muhammad Saeful Milah, Muhammad Taufik, T. S. (2022). Problematika Hukum Aset Digital Era Disrupsi 5.0 Di Indonesia Melalui Pendekatan Legislasi. Jurnal Mahupas: Mahasiswa Hukum Unpas, 1(2), 67–88.

Anwary, I. (2018). Lembaga Negara dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Konstitusional Lembaga Negara (1st ed.). Genta Publishing.

As-suvi, A. Q., & Zainullah, M. (2022). Sociology of Law in The Perspective of Roscoe Pound and Donald Black and Its Relevance in The Indonesian Context. PJLS: Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), 82–95.

Bernadette, J., Shirakawa, R., & Korwatanasakul, U. (2019). Cryptocurrency regulations: institutions and financial openness. In ADBI Working Paper Series (Issue 978, p. 17).

Diantha, I. M. P. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Cetakan ke). Prenadamedia Group.

DPR RI. (2022). Omnibus Law Sektor Keuangan, DPR dan Pemerintah Sahkan RUU P2SK Jadi UU (p. 1). www.dpr.go.id.

Francisco, R., Rodelas, N., & Ubaldo, J. E. (2022). The Perception of Filipinos on the Advent of Cryptocurrency and Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Games. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 6(1), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.89

H’ng, Z. X., Soon, J. Y., & Althabhawi, N. (2022). Theory and Application of Roscoe Pound’s Sociological Jurisprudence: Transgenderism. Current Law Journal Legal Network Series, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4083718

Haji, R. (2022). Urgensi Penerapan Kerangka Regulasi Aset Kripto Yang Komprehensif, Adaptif, Dan Akomodatif. Rusno Haji, 1(1), 34.

Hanim, S. F. (2023). Pengawasan Koperasi Simpan Pinjam dan Pembiayaan Syariah Pasca Undang-undang No 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan. Hukum Bisnis, 12(2), 91–99.

Hasani, M. N. (2022). Analisis Cryptocurrency Sebagai Alat Alternatif Dalam Berinvestasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 8(2), 329–344.

ICEL. (2023). Penguatan Semu Keuangan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia: Catatan Kritis Undang-Undang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (p. 1). icel.or.id.

Imam Asmarudin. (2022). Struggle of Legal Positivism Versus Progressive Thoughts in the Formal Tests of the Job Creation Act (Legal Development through Hermeneutics). Dinamika Hukum, 22(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3178

Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711

Johan, S., & Ariawan, A. (2022). Correlation Financial Institutions, Customers and Employees Per Labour Law. Arena Hukum, 15(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01501.3

Lubis, I., Murwadji, T., Sukarja, D., & Rosmalinda, R. (2022). Penetration of International Economic Law in the Development of the Cyber Notary Concept in Indonesia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 22(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.868

M. Yusuf Yahya, H. A. (2022). Roscou Pound: Hukum Sebagai Alat Rekayasa Sosial (Keterhubungannya Dengan Kaidah La Yunkaru Tagayyur Al- Ahkam Bi Tagayyuri Azzaman). Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice, 2(2), 148.

Muhammad Haikal Kautsar, Ivan Yulivan, H. J. S. (2021). Ancaman Dari Sektor Financial Technology Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Pertahanan Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertahanan, 7(1), 119–130.

Muttaqin, Z. (2021). Formalization of Islamic Law in Indonesia in the Framework of Social Engineering Theory by Roscoe Pound. El-Mashlahah, 11(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i2.2825

Puspasari, S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Investor pada Transaksi Aset Kripto dalam Bursa Berjangka Komoditi. Jurist-Diction, 3(1), 303. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i1.17638

Putri, U. T. (2020). Disgorgement as Remedial Action in Indonesian Capital Market Regime. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i1.a15673

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Riswandi, B. A. (n.d.). Hukum dan Teknologi : Model Kolaborasi Hukum dan Teknologi dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Hak Cipta di Internet. 345–367.

Shellma Riyaadhotunnisa, Muhamad Amirulloh, D. Y. (2022). Activities of Uncertified Crypto Asset Physical Traders: A Study of Legal Protection for Investor. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 165.

Sulistina, S., Anggono, B. D., Khanif, A., & Dinh, T. N. (2022). The Pathway of Adopting Omnibus Law in Indonesia’s Legislation: Challenges and Opportunities in Legal Reform. Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 2(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v2i2.31524

Susilowardhani, S., Bidari, A. S., & Nurviana, R. (2022). Regulation and the Future of Cryptocurrency in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v6i3.6539

Syafri Hariansah. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Budaya Hukum dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara: Studi Kritis Pendekatan Masyarakat, Budaya dan Hukum. Krtha Bhayangkara, 16(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v16i1.1000

Tambun, M. A., & Putuhena, M. I. (2022). Tata Kelola Pembentukan Regulasi Terkait Perdagangan Mata Uang Kripto (Cryptocurrency) Sebagai Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset). Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(1), 33–58.

Thakur, D. S., Varma, R. A., Damodar, & Hake, M. (2022). Regulation of Cryptocurrency in India : Issues and Challenges. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 8921–8929.

van der Linden, T., & Shirazi, T. (2023). Markets in crypto-assets regulation: Does it provide legal certainty and increase adoption of crypto-assets? Financial Innovation, 9(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00432-8

Wardoyo, W., Nuryakin, C., & Hambali, S. (2020). Bitcoin in Indonesia: Hedging or Investment Instrument? Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 9(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v9i3.62

Wardoyo, Y. P., Ratna, D., & Hapsari, I. (2023). Cryptocurrency Assets as Physical Collateral in Indonesia. Legality, 31(1), 59–71.

Zengin, B., & Kocoglu, S. (2022). Cryptocurrency Market and Tax Regulations in Turkey: an Analysis in the European Emerging Economy. Finanse i Prawo Finansowe: Journal of Finance and Financial Law, 3(35), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.35.06

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-12-30