GOOD FAITH AS A BASIS FOR CONSUMER LIABILITY IN CASH ON DELIVERY (COD) TRANSACTIONS

Authors

  • Admiral Admiral Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Riau
  • Puti Mayang Seruni Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Riau
  • Surizki Febrianto Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3522

Abstract

Cash on Delivery (COD) is a popular type of transaction in online buying and selling. However, the implementation of the COD feature creates the issue of consumers being reluctant to make payments after the goods have come as agreed. This unilateral cancellation may result in losses for the seller, the application, and the courier. The aim of this research is to examine the legal liabilities of consumers who make unilateral cancellations to prevent losses. This is normative research that employs secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The gathered data is then qualitatively analyzed and related with the core problem. According to the findings, the agreement must be made in good faith, which can be defined as subjective good faith (honesty) and objective good faith (propriety and justice) under Article 1338 paragraph 3 of the Civil Code. Judges have the right to evaluate an agreement and terminate it if it contains improper or unfair details.  Before the transaction, where the seller and buyer must be honest, good faith plays a significant part in online transactions using the COD method. Buyers are expected to carefully study the description of the items to be purchased because placing an order indicates that the buyer has agreed to the specifications of the goods and will pay when the goods are received. The COD payment method does not allow customers to cancel unilaterally without providing clear reasons and is therefore considered a default

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, M. (2020). MEMBANGUN KONSEP IDEAL PENERAPAN ASAS IKTIKAD BAIK DALAM HUKUM PERJANJIAN. Jurnal IUS Constituendum, 5(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2119

Ayu, S., & Lahmi, A. (2020). Peran e-commerce terhadap perekonomian Indonesia selama pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Kajian Manajemen Bisnis, 9(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/jkmb.10994100

Gordley, J. (2000). Gordley, James “Good Faith in Contract Law in the Medieval Ius Commune. In R. Zimmerman & S. Whittaker (Eds.), Good faith in European contract law (p. 94). Cambridge University Press.

Hadi, G., Nasution, B., Purba, H., & Barus, U. M. (2017). PENERAPAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PERJANJIAN SEWA-MENYEWA (STUDI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN SEWA MENYEWA OULET DI HERMES BUILDING MEDAN ). USU Law Journal, 5(2), 10–17.

Harun, R. S., Dungga, W. A., & Tome, A. H. (2019). Implementasi Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Transaksi Jual Beli Online. Jurnal Legalitas, 12(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v12i2.5796

Hernoko, A. Y. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial (4th ed.). Kencana.

HS, S. (2008). Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis ( BW ). Bumi Aksara.

HS, S. (2021). Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. In Sinar Grafika (Issue 22). Sinar Grafika Offset.

Lamber, M. C. M. (2018). LEGALITAS TRANSAKSI PENJULAN MELALUI INTERNET DITINJAU DARI HUKUM PERDATA. Lex Privatum, 6(8), 110–119.

Maisyura Cut Sukmawati Risna Dewi, A. (2021). Analysis Of Cash On Delivery (Cod) Payment Methods In Online Shopping Transactions In Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM 2021), 269–274.

Miru, A. (2016). Hukum kontrak & perancangan kontrak (7th ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Muljadi, G. W. & K. (2005). Perikatan yang lahir dari Undang-undang. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nisa, S. P., Bisyri, M. H., & Sa’adah, N. (2021). Praktik Jual Beli Sistem Cash On Delivery Pos Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. El Hisbah: Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 1(2), 271–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/el_hisbah.v1i2.4492

NR, A. P., Hasan, U., & Sayuti, A. T. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Reseller Online Shop Terkait Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dengan Cara Pembatalan Sepihak Yang Dilakukan Oleh Konsumen. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 3(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v3i2.17573

Perdana, N. (2023). Gara-gara COD, Seorang Kurir di Kota Malang Dianiaya Penerima Paket Artikel. Kompas.Com.

Priyono, E. A. (2017). PERANAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM KONTRAK BAKU (Upaya Menjaga Keseimbangan bagi Para Pihak). Diponegoro Privat Law Review, 1(1), 13–22.

Rahman, T. H., Apriani, D., Idris, Z., & Seruni, P. M. (2023). Delivery Business Owner Responsibilities in Damaged Goods Caused by the Employees Based on the Indonesian Consumers’ Protection Law. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2022 (IJCAH 2022), 91–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-008-4_13

Retnowati, M. S., Rosalina, N. M., Firdaus, D. F. A. S. M. I., & Urrosyidin, M. S. (2022). Analisis Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Jual Beli Online Berbasis COD (Cash on Delivery). Alhamra: Jurnal Studi Islam, 3(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v3i1.11867

Rokfa, A. A., Tanda, A. R. P., Anugraheni, A. D., & Kristanti, W. A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Sistem Pembayaran Cash On Delivery Pada Media E-Commerce. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i2.533

Sinaga, N. A. (2018). PERANAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN PARA PIHAK DALAM PERJANJIAN. Jurnal Ilmiah M-Progress, 8(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35968/m-pu.v8i1.186

Subekti. (2005). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Intermasa.

Turangan, A. F. (2019). PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN DENGAN ITIKAD BAIK MENURUT PASAL 1338 KUHPERDATA. Lex Privatum, 7(1), 46–51.

Yuanitasari, D. (2020). Pengembangan Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Pelaksanaan Asas Itikad Baik Pada Tahap Pra Kontraktual. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad PENGEMBANGAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK PADA TAHAP PRA KONTRAKTUAL, 3(2), 4.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30