EMPLOYEES' LEGAL STATUS APPOINTED AS DIRECTORS THROUGH RUPS

Authors

  • Yati Nurhayati Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3557

Abstract

Supreme Court Circular No. 1/2022 stipulates that employees or laborers are appointed directors in the same company through a General Meeting of Shareholders (RUPS) where the employment relationship with the company ends upon appointment as a director. This research aims to ascertain how the severance compensation components and their calculation are entitled to be received by employees appointed as directors through RUPS. This study employs the IRAC writing model, a legal writing technique with the structure of Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. The research findings reveal that Government Regulation No. 35/2021 does not include provisions regarding severance compensation due to the reason of being appointed as a director, leading to a legal vacuum. It creates two possibilities in practice. On the one hand, in cases where an employee resigns from their position to subsequently be appointed as a director, the calculation of compensation for the resignation is applied. On the other hand, companies can establish an internal policy governing severance and compensation calculation mechanisms for employees appointed as directors following best practices. The compensation calculation should consider that it is more than x0.5 because there is no loss or breach, but not exceeding x1.75. After all, the employee does not retire, and the termination of the employment relationship does not result in a complete separation, as the employee continues to work and receives income and benefits from the same company.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

G. Kartasapoetra. 1985. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perburuhan, Bandung: Amico.

Hotman P. Sibuea. 2010. Asas Negara Hukum, Peraturan Kebijakan, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Philipus M. Hadjon. 2002. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Journals

Arifin, R., Alkadri, R., Sari, D. P., Resthiningsih, L., & Holish, A. M. 2019. Improving Law Student Ability on Legal Writing Through Critical and Logical Thinking by IRAC Method. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, Vol. 1, Issue (1).

Bench-Capon, T.. 2020. Explaining Legal Decisions Using IRAC. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2669.

Bima Nuranda dkk. 2019. Status Hukum Pekerja Yang Diangkat Menjadi Anggota Direksi Pada Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Adanya Pengakhiran Perjanjian Kerja, Perspektif Hukum, Vol. 1 No.1

Bittner, M.. 1990. The IRAC Method of Case Study Analysis: A Legal Model for the Social Studies. The Social Studies, Vol. 81, Issue (5).

Hanum, C. 2020. Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Surat Edaran Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Humani (Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani), Vol. 10, Issue (2).

M. Yahya Harahap. 2007. “Separate Entity, Limited Liability dan Piercing the Corporate Veil”, Jakarta: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 2007, Vol. 26, No. 3.

Rivaldy David Woror, dkk, (2023), Akibat Hukum Pengangkatan Direksi Tanpa Rups Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Lex Privatum Vol.XI/No.2/Feb/2023.

Regulations

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945

Law Number 13 of 2003 Concerning Manpower

Law Number 40 of 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Companies

Government Regulation (PP) No. 35/2021 Concerning Fixed-Term Employment Agreements, Outsourcing, Working Hours and Rest Periods, and Termination of Employment

Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) No.1/2022 Concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court Chamber in 2022 as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Judiciary

Supreme Court Decision No. 1051 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019

Decision No. 948K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30