DISHARMORNISATION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY RELATED TO LAND FIRE DUE TO CLEARING PLANTATION LAND

Authors

  • Arman Koedoeboen Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v19i1.3607

Abstract

Burning forests or land is a crime that must be combated comprehensively by every party. One effort to punish perpetrators of forest or land burning is to impose a prison sentence and the maximum possible fine, to act as a deterrent and serve as a lesson to those who commit this act. The emergence of disharmonization between Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and Law No. 39 of 2014 concerning Plantations regarding criminal sanctions against perpetrators of land burning is studied with the assumption that what is happening is the result of a malfunction of the law and related law enforcement. with land fires as expected. The type of research used is normative juridical legal research, namely research that focuses on examining the application of rules or norms in positive law. The existence of multiple interpretation articles has hampered the achievement of legal objectives, namely providing a sense of justice, legal certainty and legal benefits. This multi-interpretation article creates legal uncertainty due to the variety of judges' decisions on the same case. Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and Law Number 39 of 2014 concerning Plantations are also less useful because they cause fear in the community, thereby triggering unrest in society. Commission I DPR RI needs to immediately revise or harmonize Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and Law Number 39 of 2014 concerning Plantations, especially regarding restrictions or benchmarks for offenses and the application of criminal sanctions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yusuf, Hapsoh, Siregar, & Nurrochmat, “Analisis Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan di Provinsi Riau,” Dinamika Lingkungan Indonesia, 6, No. 2 (2019): 77.

Mochammad Januar Rizki, “Melihat Pasal-pasal Penjerat Pelaku Pembakar Hutan dan Lahan”. hukumonline.com, 2020. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/melihat-pasal-pasal-penjerat-pelaku-pembakar-hutan-dan-lahan-lt5f16ba762542c/.

Olivia Anggie Johar, M. Yusuf Daeng, & Tri Novitasari Manihuruk, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencemaran Dan Perusakan Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Pembakaran Hutan Dan Lahan Di Provinsi Riau”. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 21(2) (2022): 131-154.

Syarif & Wibisana, 2010, Hukum Lingkungan: Teori, Legislasi dan Studi Kasus, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Hanafi Amrani Dan Mahrus Ali, 2015, Sistem Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dodi Nandika, 2005, Hutan Bagi Ketahanan Nasional, Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Sahuri Lasmadi, Elly Sudarti, 2018. Penerapan Pidana Pasal 92 Ayat (1) Huruf A Jo Pasal 17 Ayat (2) Huruf B Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pencegahan dan Pengrusakan Hutan (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sarolangun Nomor: 16/PID.SUS/2015/PN.SRL), Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum ( Jkh), Volume 4 Nomor 2 Agustus (2018): 172-195.

Inosentius Samsul. Instrumen Hukum Penanggulangan Kebakaran Hutan, Lahan, dan Polusi Asap. Info Singkat. Hukum VII, No 17. (2015): 1.

Sudikno Mertokusumo dalam H. Salim Hs, 2010, Perkembangan Teori Dalam Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30