Harship Doctrine Regarding Fulfillment of the Performance of an Agreement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i3.3615Abstract
In contract law, performance fulfillment is a fundamental principle. However, in practice, unforeseen changes in circumstances can disrupt performance fulfillment. To address this, the doctrine of hardship is necessary to create a balance between performance fulfillment and unforeseen changes in circumstances. The aim of this research is to analyze the concept of the hardship doctrine in contract law and identify its impact on the interpretation and performance of contracts, as well as the protection of rights and fairness for parties bound by contractual agreements. The research method used is normative research method with a focus on analyzing the legal regulations that govern the hardship doctrine. The data sources include legal texts, regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal expert opinions, along with techniques such as legal document analysis, comparison, and drawing conclusions to generate a comprehensive understanding. In contract law, the hardship doctrine refers to the concept of unforeseen changes in circumstances significantly affecting contract performance. This doctrine allows parties to request contract modifications or terminations in situations that are no longer fair or feasible. It also impacts contract interpretation, as courts determine whether the changed circumstances meet the criteria for activating the doctrine. Although not fully regulated in Indonesian legislation, the Civil Code provides relevant legal grounds. It is important for contracting parties to understand the implications of the hardship doctrine and consider its inclusion in their agreements. The doctrine plays a crucial role in protecting the rights and ensuring fairness to parties bound by contractual agreements in Indonesia. It provides protection, flexibility, and considerations for social impact and public interests. However, its use should be limited, meet strict requirements, and align with applicable laws. Therefore, the hardship doctrine serves as an essential tool to maintain balance and justice in contract performance when used carefully and in compliance with relevant conditions.Downloads
References
Adi, D. P. (2015). ABSORBSI PRINSIP ”REBUS SIC STANTIBUS” DALAM KERANGKA PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN NASIONAL. Jurnal Hukum JATISWARA.
Aisyah, S. N. (2022). TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PERSEROAN TERBATAS TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK KARYAWAN DALAM KEADAAN SULIT (HARDSHIP) PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. Universitas Sriwijaya.
Amalia, N., Ramziati, & Kurniasari, T. W. (2015). PRAKTEK KEMAHIRAN HUKUM PERANCANGAN KONTRAK. Unimal Press.
Ambar, R. M., Santoso, B., & Widhiyanti, H. N. (2018). Kajian Yuridis Pengesampingan Pasal 1266 dan Pasal 1267 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Sebagai Syarat Batal Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan. DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v3i1.157
Epilia, N. (2010). KONTRAK INTERNASIONAL DALAM MENGANTISIPASI KRISIS EKONOMI: ANALISIS TERHADAP PENERAPAN KLAUSULA FORCE MAJEURE UNTUK MEMPERKECIL DAMPAK NEGATIF KRISIS EKONOMI. Universitas Indonesia.
Evi, Sudiarti, E., & Nainggolan, S. D. P. (2023). Daya Mengikat Perjanjian Tertulis Tanpa Menggunakan Materai. Halu Oleo Law Review, 7(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v7i1.14
Firmanda, H. (2020). HUKUM KONTRAK TELAAH ASAS RE BUS SIC STANTIBUS DALAM BERKONTRAK. Taman Karya.
Hart, D. K. (2021). If Past is Prologue, Then The Future is Bleak: Contracts, COVID-19 and the Changed Circumstances Doctrines. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3785621
Hernoko, A. Y. (2006). “FORCE MAJEUR CLAUSE” ATAU “HARDSHIP CLAUSE” PROBLEMATIKA DALAM PERANCANGAN KONTRAK BISNIS. Perspektif, 11(3), 203. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v11i3.276
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Novera, A., & Utama, M. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Kontrak dan Arbitrase. Tunggal Mandiri Publishing.
Qasthari, D. A., Adolf, H., & Djukardi, E. (2019). URGENSI RATIFIKASI UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS (CISG) VIENNA 1980 TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI BARANG DI INDONESIA DIKAITKAN DENGAN AKTA NOTARIS. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(1), 1–23.
Rahmadita, I. K., & Suyatna, I. N. (2016). PENGGUNAAN BAHASA INDONESIA DIDALAM PERJANJIAN PERDATA. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 4(3).
Rahman, A. (2022). TINJAUAN YURIDIS KLAUSULA FORCE MAJEURE PERJANJIAN KREDIT BANK BERDASARKAN KEPUTUSAN PRESIDEN NO. 12 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG PENETAPAN BENCANA NONALAM PENYEBARAN CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) SEBAGAI BENCANA NASIONAL (STUDI DI BANK SULAWESI SELATAN DAN . Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
Rasuh, D. J. (2016). KAJIAN HUKUM KEADAAN MEMAKSA (FORCE MAJEURE) MENURUT PASAL 1244 DAN PASAL 1245 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA. Lex Privatum, IV(2).
Safitri, E. N. (2018). ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBAB TERJADINYA WANPRESTASI DAN PENYELESAIANNYA PADA PRODUK MURABAHAH ( Studi Pada BMT Mitra Usaha Lampung Timur). UIN Raden Intan.
Salim. (2016). Hukum Kontrak : Teori & Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. In Sinar Grafika (Issue 22).
Sinaga, N. A. (2020). PERSPEKTIF FORCE MAJEURE DAN REBUS SIC STANTIBUS DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v11i1.648
Situmorang, M. (2020). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 573. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.573-586
Situngkir, D. A. (2018). TERIKATNYA NEGARA DALAM PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2018.v2.i2.p167-180
Suherman. (2016). PERKEMBANGAN ASAS REBUS SIC STANTIBUS (PERUBAHAN KEADAAN YANG FUNDAMENTAL) DALAM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Yuridis, 3(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/.v3i1.167
Tai, E. T. T. (2019). Challenges of Smart Contracts. In The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms (pp. 80–101). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592239.005
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dian Cahayani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















