THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ARBITRATION AS AN EXPENSIVE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Authors

  • Rahmatsyah Rahmatsyah Universitas Nusa Putra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.3796

Abstract

Arbitration is an alternative non-litigation dispute resolution which has great demand but it has many weaknesses including the high cost of arbitration and decisions that cannot be executed immediately if registration has not been made at the District Court. Thus, the purpose of the analysis are 1) to analyze the juridical value of arbitration when compared to dispute resolution by litigation and 2) to analyze the effectiveness of arbitration as an effort to settle disputes outside of the court system. This study employed a normative legal methodology. The following are the outcomes of this study: Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution that is widely utilized by individuals, individuals and legal entities, between legal entities, etc. in the context of commercial law. Arbitration is widely chosen because dispute resolution is carried out in a closed, flexible and faster way than litigation and has binding legal force. Arbitration has more value, if the process is carried out correctly, observant in analyzing the problems and fulfilling the elements of the rules regarding the execution of the arbitral award. 2) The arbitration will be legally binding if the parties comply with the arbitration rules in the country where the matter will be executed.. Conclusion: arbitration remains an effective non-litigation dispute resolution option but must pay attention to the arbitration process and provisions so that the parties' awareness will arise to register the results of the arbitration decision and comply with the arbitration law applicable in each country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kelebihan Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Arbitrase”, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt58a6bf5208d32/makin-ngetrend--ini-5-kelebihanpenyelesaiansengketa-melalui-arbitrase , accessed on September 30, 2022.

______. 2006. Time and Money: Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, L. Mistelis and D M Lew, eds 2006.

______2007. International Dispute Resolution Overview”, https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/intl-dispute-resolutionoverview-june-2007.pdf, accessed on 30 September 2022.

Adolf, Huala. 2015. Dasar-Dasar, Prinsip Dan Filosofi Arbitrase, Cetakan ke-2. Bandung: Keni Media.

Amanuddin, Ananda Puspita. 2017. Peranan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Penanaman Modal, Lex Administratum, Vol. V, No. 1, Jan-Feb 2017, Hal. 90-98.

Blackaby, et,al, Negel. 2009. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, New York: Oxford.

Blackaby, Nigel – Partasides, Constantine – Redfern, Alan – Hunter, Martin, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press. 2015, para. 9.99; Born, Gary B., International Commercial Arbitration, Second Edition, Kluwer Law International 2014, p. 3085-3086.

C Newmark, Controllling Time and Costs in International Arbitration, Chapter 6 in The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration, 2nd Edition 2008, (Newman & Hill, Eds), pages 81 – 96

Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee v. Hammermills, Inc., No. 90-0169, 1992 US Dist. Lexis 8046 (D.C. Cir. 29 Mei 1992).

Drahozal, Christopher R. 2008. Arbitration Costs and Forum Accessibility: Empirical Evidence, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Volume 41, 2008

Gelman, Lisa. 2002. Arbitration Pro’s and Con’s, https://lisagelman.com/ mediation/arbitration-pros-andcons/, accessed on September 30, 2022.

Greenberg, Simon & Kee, Christopher dan Weeramantry, J Romesh. 2010. International Commercial Arbitration an Asia Pacific Pesrpective. UK: Cambrigde University.

Hasanah, Yuliani Uswatun., Marpaung, Devi Siti Hamzah. 2022. Biaya Arbitrase “Mahal” Menjadi Kelebihan Dari Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, Vol. 9 No. 3 Tahun 2022

Hendra, Frans. 2011. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hikmahanto Juwana. 2018, Arbitrase Sebagai Forum Penyelesaian Sengketa, Modul International Excursion, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Dan Arbitrase Internasional Batch III, Justitia Learning & Networking Center (JLNC), Jakarta-Malaysia-Singapura.

Houthoff Buruma, International Commercial Arbitration: An Introduction. 2013. pg. 9-10.

ICC. 2007.Techniques for Controlling Time and Costs in Arbitration, Report from the ICC Commission on Arbitration.

J K Goytanda. 1999. Awarding costs and attorneys’ fees in internationbal commercial arbitrations, 21 Michigan Journal of International Law (1999) 1-50.

M Abascal Zamora. 2007. Reducing Time and Costs in International Arbitration, Modern Law for Global Commerce, paper delivered to the Congress to celebrate the 40th annual session of UNCITRAL, July 2007.

M P O’Reilly and E Ryan, Costs in international commercial arbitration, Ch. 9 in International Commercial Arbitration: Practical Perspectives (A. Berkeley & J. Mimms Eds), Centre of Construction Law & Management, King’s College, London, September 2001, 121 - 135.

Muskibah. 2018. Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), Volume 4 Nomor 2 Agustus 2018, hal. 150-171

Okekeifere, Andrew I. 1998. Commercial Arbitration as the Most Effective Dispute Resolution Method, 15 J. INT'L ARB. 81, 86-88.

R H Kreindler. 2006. Final Rulings on Costs: Loser Pays All?, Best Practice in International Arbitration, Proceedings of the ASA Conference, Zurich 27 January 2006.

Redfern, Alan & Hunter, Martin. 1991. Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration 248 (2d ed. 1991).

Sari, Indah. 2019. Keunggulan Arbitrase Sebagai Forum Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara–Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma, Volume 9 No.2, Maret 2019, hal 47-73

Sutantio, Retnowulan dan Oeripkartawinata, Iskandar. 1988. Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Alumni, 1988), hal 68

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

U.S. Chamber Inst. for Legal Reform, Arbitration: Simpler, Cheaper, and Faster Than Litigation 21 (2005).

Vocabulary.com accessed on September 30, 2022 861–866, p.865

Downloads

Published

2024-01-03