On The Special Administrative Disputes in Indonesia: Legal Certainty or Legal Uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.3932Keywords:
Special Administrative Disputes, Legal Certainty, State Administrative CourtAbstract
The evolution of State Administrative Court Procedure Law is highly dynamic, in accordance with the implementation of multiple laws and regulations that govern the State Administrative Court. In the past, the procedural law of the TUN Court consistently made reference to Law no. 5 of 1986 in connection with Law no. 9 of 2004 and Law no. 51 of 2009. However, the procedural law of the State Administrative Court has undergone further development. Furthermore, there are already other sector-specific rules that have been established to particularly govern the resolution of some administrative court issues. Examinations that are not categorized as Ordinary Events, Quick Events, or Short Events are generally referred to as Special administrative court Disputes. The question at hand is whether the presence of this unique administrative court disagreement ensures legal assurance under the procedural law at the administrative Court, encompassing the mechanism for resolving such disputes. The study methodology employed is normative juridical, utilizing both a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The Special TUN dispute category encompasses requests for abuse of authority tests, positive fake requests, public information disputes, land acquisition disputes for development in the public interest, and general electoral process issues. Among the various disputes in the Special State Administrative Court, the issue of the Positive Fictitious Petition lacks legal certainty. This is because the procedural law is governed by a Presidential Regulation that is not consistent with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which stipulates that judicial power must be regulated by legislation.
Downloads
References
Aritonang, S. I., & Erliyana, A. (2023). Discretionary Authority of Government Officials After Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation in the Perspective of Government Administration:(Case Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020). Santhet: Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan, Dan Humaniora, 7(1), 170–180.
Bedner, A. (2001). Administrative Court Review: Basic Concepts and their Interpretation. In Administrative Courts in Indonesia (pp. 53–102). Brill Nijhoff.
Boucher, D. (2009). The limits of ethics in international relations: natural law, natural rights, and human rights in transition. Oxford University Press.
Dragos, D. C., Neamtu, B., & Radu, B. (2020). Using Legal Fictions to Deal with Administrative Silence: The Case of Romania. The Sound of Silence in European Administrative Law, 399–432.
Harun, M. (2019). Philosophical Study of Hans Kelsen’s Thoughts on Law and Satjipto Rahardjo’s Ideas on Progressive Law. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 1(2), 195–220.
Hum, M. M. (n.d.). THE MALFUNCTION OF JUDGEMENT POSTPONEMENT INSTITUTION (SCHORSING) IN THE STATE ADMINISTRATION COURT SYSTEM.
Januar, I., Bakri, M., Sulistyarini, R., & Santoso, B. (2021). Comparison of Procedural Laws of Executive Power Certificate of Fiduciary Guarantee and Guarantee of Mortgage Based on The Decision of The Constitutional Court. Proceedings from the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights, ICLHR 2021, 14-15 April 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Johnny Ibrahim. (2005). Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Merrill, T. W. (2011). Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law. Colum. L. Rev., 111, 939.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.
Muhammad, R., Rosyidi, I., & Rumkel, N. (2021). Normative Analysis of Unlawful Acts of State Administrative Officials Related to the Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 4(4), 674–683.
Nurianti, L. E., Yuslim, Y., & Khairani, K. (2020). The Position of the Attorney’s Request for Information in Corruption Case Investigation as the Object of the Application for Abuse of Authority in the State Administrative Court (Study of Decision Number: 25/G/2015/PTUN-MDN). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(6), 590–612.
Pastor Muñoz, N. (2023). Why International Criminal Law Can and Should Be Conceived with Supra-Positive Law: The Non-Positivistic Nature of International Criminal Legality. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 17(2), 381–406.
Patittingi, F., Limpo, S. Y., Lahae, K., Anindhita, A. B., Al Rossi, C., & Riza, M. (2021). The Comparison of Positive and Negative Publication System on Land Registration in Indonesia. Pt. 2 J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 24, 1.
Purbacaraka, P., & Soekanto, S. (1978). Perihal kaedah hukum. (No Title).
Sasmito, H. (2018). Implementation Of Decisions And Obstacles Administrative Court-Implementation Obstacles. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(2), 391–396.
Setiawan, H. I., & Abustan, A. (2023). Juridical Analysis Of Personnel Dispute Resolution In The State Administrative Court (Analysis Of Case Decision Number 45/G/2020/Ptun-Jkt). International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 4(4), 639–650.
Sudjati, X. Q. D., & Cahyandari, D. (2022). General Principles of Good Governance in Administrative Court Decision Regarding Request for Review of Abuse of Authority. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 21(3), 461–479.
Permadi, M. A. M., Syaban, W. K., Habibi, M. I., Purnama, F., & Ampera, S. (2026). The Dynamics Of Learning Difficulties Among Students At Islamic Boarding Schools In The Digital Age: Between Tradition And Technological Limitations. Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 202-218.
Abdulghani, N. A., & Sya'ban, W. K. (2026). Inter-Islamic Law Simulation in Education as an Effort to Build a Community Legal Culture. Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner, 59-67.
Permadi, M. A. M., & Sya'ban, W. K. (2025). T Transformasi Pendidikan Islam: Studi Komparatif Sistem Pengajaran di Pesantren Tradisional dan Pesantren Modern: Transformasi Pendidikan Islam: Studi Komparatif Sistem Pengajaran di Pesantren Tradisional dan Pesantren Modern. Transformation of Islamic Management and Education, 2(1), 18-24.
Suhartono, R. M., & Salam, S. (2021). Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions: Conception, and Barriers. Musamus Law Review, 3(2), 49–57.
Sujatmoko, E., Wahyuni, I., & Abrianto, B. O. (2016). Inter Regional Government Cooperation: Administrative Law Perspective. Indonesian J. Int’l L., 14, 28.
Syahrum, M. (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi dan Tesis. CV. Dotplus Publisher.
Veronika, T., & Rafianti, F. (2023). Ambiguity Of The Verdict On The Position Of Multiple Certificates On The Object Of Land Disputes. LITERACY: International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 2(3), 137–151.
Wahyudi, A. (2021). Politik Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (TUN). HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bambang Ariyanto, Sukardi Sukardi, Rosa Ristiawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
