Analyzing the Authority Relationship Between the Center and Regions in the Reconstruction of the Execution of Decisions in Industrial Relations Dispute Resolution Cases Based on Progressive Law

Ibnu Affan

doi:10.31941/pj.v20i2.3995

Authors

Ibnu Affan Faculty of Law, Islamic University of North Sumatra, Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v20i2.3995

Abstract

The enforcement of general civil procedural law in the execution process of Industrial Relations Dispute Resolution (PPHI) cases, as mandated by Article 57 of the PPHI Law, has resulted in a slow execution process. Based on this, there is a need for adequate political awareness among stakeholders to carry out the reconstruction of the legal execution of PPHI case decisions. In order for this legal reconstruction movement to arise from the nation's political will, it is necessary to implement political policies. Based on the above explanation, the issues in this research can be formulated as follows: 1) How is the current implementation of the execution of decisions in industrial relations dispute resolution cases?; 2) What are the weaknesses in its implementation?; 3) What is the ideal reconstruction of the execution of decisions in industrial relations dispute resolution cases based on progressive legal justice? This research is descriptive, using empirical legal research and a socio-legal juridical approach. The research data sources are obtained from primary and secondary data. To collect primary data, observations and interviews are conducted, while obtaining secondary data involves studying legislation, jurisprudence, research results, academic works, dictionaries, and other relevant materials. This research will ultimately result in an ideal reconstruction of the execution of PPHI case decisions based on progressive legal justice, which will be incorporated into articles in the amendment of the PPHI Law, including: regulating the direct seizure of immovable property without specifying a limit on the amount of seizure by reconstructing Article 197 paragraph (1) HIR/Article 208 paragraph (1) RBg, exempting execution fees for claims worth IDR 150,000,000 (one hundred and fifty million Indonesian rupiahs) or more by reconstructing Article 58 of the PPHI Law, and prohibiting legal remedies such as Judicial Review by reconstructing Article 66 of the Supreme Court Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afiudi, Ummie Tsabita Ananda, Neisa Angrum Adisti, Ayu Puspasari, Aimi, Dewi Indasari, Liza Utami, and others, ‘Penyelesaian Kasus Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) Akibat Pandemi Covid Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial’, Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 12.1 (2023), 48–58 <https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v12i1.2441>

Arfa, Faisal Ananda, and Watni Marpaung, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam: Edisi Revisi (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018)

Charda, Ujang, ‘Model Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Setelah Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004’, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 1.1 (2017), 1 <https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v1i1.124>

Dani, Umar, ‘Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Sistem Unity Of Jurisdiction Atau Duality Of Jurisdiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur Dan Karakteristiknya/Understanding Administrative Court In Indonesia: Unity Of Jurisdiction Or Duality’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7.3 (2018), 405–24 <https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.405-424>

Erwin, Yanuar Putra, ‘Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Dalam Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial’, Legislasi Indonesia, 12.4 (2015), 1–21

Ginting, Rico Saputra, ‘Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) Atas Kesalahan Berat’, DHARMASISYA: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2.1 (2022), 495–512

Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum; Pilihan Metode Dan Praktik Penulisan Arikel (Yogyakarta: Mitra Buana Media, 2020)

Mantili, Rai, ‘Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase)’, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6.1 (2021), 47–65 <https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.252>

Maryono, Dwi, ‘Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial: Beberapa CatatanMasukan RUU Hukum Acara Perdata’, Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal, 1.3 (2018), 345–50

Muda, Abdul Hakim Sori, M Yamin Lubis, and Mustamam Mustamam, ‘Analisis Yuridis Pemalsuan Dokumen Tanah Di Deli Serdang (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam Nomor 1871/Pid.B/2022/PN. Lbp)’, Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 5.3 (2023), 19–33 <https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v5i3.391>

Nadapdap, Gindo, ‘Upaya Hukum Dan Eksekusi Terhadap Putusan Phi Yang Telah Mempunyai Kekuatan Hukum’, Jurnal Ekonomi Hukum & Humaniora, 1.1 (2022), 1–10

Phireri, Muhammad Sabir Rahman, Delvi Paluaran, and Andi Fauzan Makmur, ‘Analisis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan (Eksekusi) Perkara Perdata’, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 10.1 (2022), 43–46

Purwati, Ani, Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori Dan Praktek (Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing, 2020)

Saragih, Minggu, and Ida Nadirah, ‘Problematika Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Pasca Putusan MK NO 34/PUU-XVII/2019 Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial’, Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa, 3.1 (2023), 19–26

Sejati, Hono, ‘Penyelesaian Perselisihan Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial’, Jurnal Spektrum Hukum, 15.1 (2018), 1–14

Sherly, Sherly Ayuna Putri, Agus Mulya Karsona, and Revi Inayatillah, ‘Pembaharuan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Ketenagakerjaan Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Murah Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum’, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 5.2 (2021), 310–27 <https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v5i2.307>

Simpen, I Ketut, and Herry Indiyah Wismani, ‘Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Menurut Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan’, Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha, 2.2 (2020), 82–97 <https://doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v2i2.164>

Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus, and Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya, ‘Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Berbasis Pemberdayaan Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Buruh Dalam Mencari Keadilan’, ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 3.1 (2017), 17–37 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v3i1.42>

Tjukup, I Ketut, Nyoman A. Martiana, Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra, Nyoma Satyayudha Dananjaya, and I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra, ‘Penerapan Teori Hukum Pembangunan Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Murah’, ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 1.1 (2015), 145–160

Tobing, Christina NM, ‘Menggagas Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Bingkai Ius Constituendum Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan / Initiating An Industrial Relations Court In The Framework Of Ius Constituendum As An Effort To Realize Legal Certainty And Jus’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7.2 (2018), 297–326 <https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.297-326>