Inconsistencies & Problems of Supreme Court Decision No. 26 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2014 concerning Annulment of Arbitration Award

Zurisman Zakaria; Sudirman Sudirman; Wahyudi Umar

doi:10.31941/pj.v23i1.4158

Authors

Zurisman Zakaria Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Sudirman Sudirman Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Wahyudi Umar Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.4158

Abstract

Arbitration awards are usually considered an efficient and effective way to resolve business disputes. However, just like an award in a court, an arbitral award may also be annulled if it meets the requirements mentioned in Article 70 of the Arbitration Law. This study aims to analyze the inconsistencies of the Supreme Court decision No. 26/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2014 which annulled the arbitral award. This research uses normative legal research methods by applying a statutory law approach and a case approach. Based on the results of the study, there are inconsistencies in the Supreme Court decision No. 26/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2014 which annulled the BANI arbitration award No. 442/I/ARB-BANI/2012 by considering factors outside the contents of article 70 of the Arbitration Law. Observing this phenomenon, it is important to add articles that provide guidance on the use of reasons outside the contents of article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999 in the annulment of arbitral awards, with the aim of providing legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andriansyah M, ‘Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Oleh Pengadilan Negeri’ (2014) 2 Jurnal Cita Hukum

Ariprabowo T and Nazriyah R, ‘Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014’ (2018) 14 Jurnal Konstitusi 701

Asnawi MN, Hermeneutika Putusan Hakim (UII Press 2014)

Bambang S, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis’ [2006] Citra Media Yogyakarta 3

Chadijah S, ‘Problematika Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Pengadilan (Studi Kasus : Pt Geo Dipa Energi (Persero) Dengan Pt Bumigas Energi)’ (2019) 2 Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 479

Fuadi M, ‘Arbitrase Nasional : Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis’ x

Gatot P. Soemartono, Arbitrase Dan Mediasi Di Indonesia (2006) <https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mrZ_ekR8go0C>

Hakimi MZ, ‘Hukum & Penyelesaian Sengketa’ 1

Hamdi MF, ‘Kedudukan Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Merekonstruksi Hukum Acara’ (2019) 3 Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 313

Harahap MY, Arbitrase (Sinar Grafika 2006)

Indonesia MKR, ‘Alasan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Timbulkan Norma Baru, MK Hapus Norma Penjelasan Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase’ (www.mkri.id, 2014) <https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=10366#.WdW1vtR97De> accessed 27 March 2023

Johnny I, ‘Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif’ [2006] Bayumedia Publishing 299 <http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/131808346/pendidikan/metodologi-penelitian.pdf>

Kantaatmadja MK, ‘National Court and the Interactions with Tribunals, the Indonesian Experience’, Proceeding Sixth RAIF Conference on International Arbitration (2012)

KBBI, ‘Arti Kata Aposteriori - Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online’ (kbbi.web.id, 2023) <https://kbbi.web.id/aposteriori> accessed 28 March 2023

——, ‘Arti Kata Apriori - Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online’ (kbbi.web.id, 2023) <https://kbbi.web.id/apriori> accessed 28 March 2023

Kurniati G, ‘Studi Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Dan Implementasinya Antara Lembaga Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Dan Singapore International Arbitration Centre’ (2016) 1 Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure 201

Lawyers B, ‘Prosedur Mendaftarkan Putusan Arbitrase Di Pengadilan Negeri’ (blog.bplawyers.co.id, 2016) <https://blog.bplawyers.co.id/prosedur-mendaftarkan-putusan-arbitrase-di-pengadilan-negeri/> accessed 27 March 2023

Lestari DS and Muhammad Rustamaji, ‘Analisis Atas Kesalahan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Penipuan Yang Menyimpangi Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan’ (2020) 7 Jurnal Verstek 1

Mertokusumo S, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar (Liberty 2004)

Rengganis, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase National Berdasarkan Pasal 70 Undang- Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 (Studi Kasus Terhadap Beberapa Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI)’ (Universitas Indonesia 2011)

Rustan A, Hsieh J and Umar W, ‘Maladministration on Mining Business Licenses : Case Study “ Mining Business License Production Operation PT . Aneka’ (2021) 17 Varia Justicia 246

Saifullah S, ‘Kajian Kritis Teori Hukum Progresif Terhadap Status Anak Di Luar Nikah Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010’ (1970) 8 Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 307

Satjipto R, ‘Hukum Progresif: Hukum Yang Membebaskan’ (2005) Vol. 1 (1) Jurnal Hukum Progresif 24

Sefriani, ‘Investment Arbitration Bagi Negara Berkembang Dan Terbelakang’ (2013) 2 Yustisia Jurnal Hukum

Situmorang M, ‘Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase’ (2020) 20 Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 573

Soehartono, ‘Mengembangkan Pemikiran Hakim Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa’ (2014) 3 Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 25

Sujayadi S, ‘Patologi Dalam Arbitrase Indonesia: Ketentuan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Pasal 70 Uu No. 30/1999’ [2015] ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata <http://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/view/19%0Ahttps://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/download/19/25>

Sujono I, ‘Urgensi Penemuan Hukum Dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi Dalam of Jurisprudence in the Authority Of’ (2021) 18 Jurnal Konstitusi

Sung M-H and Umar W, ‘A New Industry and Tax Base on Taxing Esports in Indonesia’ (2020) 27 Jurnal Media Hukum 147

Suteki, ‘Masa Depan Hukum Progresif’ 1

Vunieta and Haque WA, ‘Legal Protection Against the Failure To Compensate on International Investment Dispute’ (2019) 8 Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 205

Widarto J, ‘Penerapan Asas Putusan Hakim Harus Dianggap Benar (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/Puu-Xi/2013)’ (2016) 13 Lex Jurnalica 67

Widowaty Y and Fitriyanti F, ‘Inkonsistensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Dalam Membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase’ (2017) 23 Jurnal Media Hukum 209

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 15/PUU-XII/2014 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa 2014 1