LEGAL PROTECTION OF ONLINE SOCIAL GATHERING MEMBERS EXPERIENCE LOSSES DUE TO DEFENSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v21i2.4343Abstract
This research aims to determine legal protection for online social gathering participants and also to determine inhibiting factors in dealing with members who are in default. The type of research used is sociological legal research or empirical law. Empirical legal research is legal research that analyzes the actual application of law to individuals, groups, communities, legal institutions in society with an emphasis on the behavior of individuals or communities, organizations or legal institutions in relation to the application or enactment of the law. In this research, the author conducted research in Jayapura City as the author discovered problems in the field regarding the rights of owners who were disadvantaged in transactions via electronic media at online social gatherings. The research results show that the legal protection that is expected to be provided to members who experience losses is legal protection related to compensation. However, in order to get the entire compensation, the management found obstacles in it, namely the online social gathering manager could not provide proof because there was no guarantee or written agreement in it. Inhibiting factors in dealing with members who are in default are: Settlement of default cases committed by one party against another party can initially be pursued in a non-litigation manner before ultimately if a settlement is not reached then it will be continued in litigation or before trial.Downloads
References
Ahmadi Miru, 2008, Hukum Perjanjian dan Perancangan Perjanjian, PT. Raja GrafindoPersada, Jakarta.
Billy Dicko Stepanus Harefa. Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Lisan Bila Terjadi Wanprestasi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor 44/PDT.G/2015/PN.YYK). Jurnal Private Law, Volume 4 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 p.115
Budi Suhariyanto, Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2012, p. 20.
Gelam Destra. 2021. Legalitas Perjanjian Arisan Online Ditinjau Dari Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Skripsi. Fakultas Hukum, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya. p. 3-4
Hamzah, A, 2019, Delik Tertentu (Special Delicten) di dalam KUHP, Sinar Grafik, Jakarta.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. [Online]. Tersedia di kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/Arisan.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Muhaimin, 2020, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram University Press.
Priskila Askahlia Sanggo, Diana Lukitasari, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Penipuan Arisan Online Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik” Vol.3, Nomor 2, Mei-Agustus 2014, p. 227.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2000, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Baharudin Saleh Ingratubun

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













