JUDGES' CODE OF ETHICS AS THE BASIS OF JUDGES' MORALITY IN ADDRESSING DECISIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.4398Abstract
Many focus on the performance of judges, and most state that the performance of judges in Indonesia is abysmal, even though their decisions must truly achieve justice as expected by justice seekers. The principle of independence can be bent under the pretext of personal interests. This research aims to analyze the judge's code of ethics as the basis for the judge's morality in sentencing. Research data was obtained through a comprehensive literature study and analysis of related legal documents, including legal texts, government regulations and court decisions relating to the two provinces. After the data was collected, an analytical approach was taken using the legal and constitutional framework as a guide. The research results show that judges deciding a case in court are based on various statutory regulations to underlie and support judges so that they can settle cases submitted to court truly independently and free from interference from any party. This means that statutory regulations honestly guarantee the independence of judges in handling and deciding cases. The judge's morality in examining and deciding every case handled by the court is based on high moral values, both originating from conscience as the most profound whisper of the heart and based on religious teachings. To become a judge so that the resulting decision can be fair and wise, the judge must have a solid spiritual foundation, be honest, and have the courage to take a firm stance.Downloads
References
Agusta, M., Yensi Afita, C. O., & Syafrinia, S. (2020). Kode Etik Profesi Hakim Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Profesi Hakim Yang Berintegritas. Datin Law Jurnal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.36355/dlj.v1i2.452
Ariyanti, V. (2019). Kebebasan Hakim Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Menangani Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 4(40), 163–167. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.24235/mahkamah.v4i2.5374
El Hakim, H. M. I. (2021). Pemantapan Dimensi Etika Dan Asas Sebagai Penguatan Sistem Hukum Lingkungan Di Indonesia. Auditor Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 2(3), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i3.18041
Fitrian, A., & Muhammad, A. (2021). Penerapan Metode Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Perkara di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science …. http://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/45
Hidayah, R., & Lutfi Zarkasi. (2021). Etika Profesi Hakim Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.v10i2.776
Jailani Tanjung, A. K., Purwadi, H., & Hartiwiningsih. (2019). Paradigma Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i1.29178
Juniansyah, E., & Zahri, S. (2024). Putusan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara di Luar Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 24(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v24i1.3811
Lailam, T. (2020). Membangun Constitutional Morality Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 511. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.511-530
Lestari, E. L. (2023a). Negarawan, Independensi Kualifikasi Negarawan Sebagai Independensi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 5(2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v5i2.113
Lestari, E. L. (2023b). Negarawan, Independensi Kualifikasi Negarawan Sebagai Independensi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 5(2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v5i2.113
Monita, Y., Hukum, F., & Jambi, U. (2023). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memberikan Putusan Lepas ( Osnlag ) Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 4(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v4i1.25352
Nixon, G., Sabdono, E., & Novalina, M. (2021). Penderitaan tidak kasat mata di tengah pandemi: analisis naratif Hakim-hakim 19:1-30 dalam perspektif feminis. Kurios, 7(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v7i1.252
Palsari, C. (2022). Kajian Pengantar Ilmu Hukum : Tujuan Dan Fungsi Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Dasar Fundamental Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(3), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v4i3.43191
Pinarta, I. P. B., & Mertha, I. K. (2020). PEngaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Analisis Disparitas Penanggulangan Penjatuhan Pidana Di Indonesia. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(10), 1608. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i10.p11
Rahman, A., Sofyan, & Mulham Jaki Asti. (2022). Hakim Peradilan Agama: Refleksi Sistem Pengangkatan dan Pelaksana Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 20(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v20i1.2780
Rai Iqsandri. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Nilai Keadilan Dalam Putusan Hakim Pada Kasus Kebakaran Lahan Di Indonesia. Jotika Research in Business Law, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.56445/jrbl.v1i1.23
Rayfindratama, A. D. (2023). PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN. 1(2). https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i2.409
Salsabila, R. T., Irwandi, I., & Eriton, M. (2024). Analisis Kewenangan Antara Mahkamah Agung Dengan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Pengawasan Hakim Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law, 4(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.22437/limbago.v4i1.18035
Sandro Unas. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Bentuk Putusan Hakim Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Et Societatis, VII(4), 58–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v7i4.24704
SARI, N. L. A. (2022). Kewenangan Pengawasan Dan Advokasi Komisi Yudisial Terhadap Hakim Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 18 Tahun 2011 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial. Ganec Swara, 16(2), 1591. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v16i2.324
Simanjuntak, M. P. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Ultra Petita Hakim dalam menjatuhkan Pidana Mati terhadap pelaku yang menyimpan Narkotika Golongan I bukan tanaman melebihi 5 gram (Studi Putusan Pengadilan No. 241/PID.SUS/2019/PN.TJB). Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(2), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.55904/cessie.v1i2.433
Sinaga, H. D. P., & Bolifaar, A. H. (2020). Blockchain Adoption for Plea Bargaining of Corporate Crime in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2020 The 2nd …. https://doi.org/10.1145/3390566.3391680
Siregar, P. J. W. S. (2021). Check and Balances dalam Sistem Peradilan Etik. Jurnal Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/JKD.v1i1.1102
Sunaryo, S., & Purnamawati, S. A. (2019). Paradigma Hukum Yang Benar Dan Hukum YANG BAIK (Perspektif Desain Putusan Hakim Perkara Korupsi di Indonesia). Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.25105/hpph.v1i2.5465
Syndo, S. A. D. (2022). Menyoal Efektivitas Kode Etik Hakim dalam Menjaga Marwah Kualitas Putusan yang Berkeadilan. Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 1(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.30762/vjhtn.v1i2.178
Wibowo, A. S., Kanur, A., Suriyadi, A. A., & ... (2024). Diskursus Signifikansi Restorative Justice dalam Kebijakan Kriminal. EKOMA: Jurnal …. https://journal-nusantara.com/index.php/EKOMA/article/view/3121
Widowati, C. (2021). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan. 51(2). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.3050
Zulfiani, A. (2023). Restorative Justice Dan Penjatuhan Pidana Pada Anak. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary …. https://jurnal.ranahresearch.com/index.php/R2J/article/view/778
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mujiyana Mujiyana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
