Res Ipsa Loquitur: Evidence in Civil Law and Islamic Law; Viewed from a doctrinal point of view
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.4409Abstract
In cases of suspected medical malpractice, it is tough to prove that there is an element of negligence because access to evidence is within or under the perpetrator's control, making it difficult for the victim to access it. In the legal field, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was introduced, which makes it easier for victims to prove who is guilty by showing indirect evidence, namely evidence of a fact or several facts from which a reasonable conclusion can be drawn. This research examines the application of res ipsa loquitur in terms of doctrine, civil evidence law, and Islamic law. This research is a literature study using a normative approach that refers to civil evidence law and Islamic law provisions. The legal analysis used is a conceptual, comparative and case study approach. This research found that applying res ipsa loquitur in judicial practice, as long as it is not regulated in procedural law, is a principle that becomes a source for judges to find the law. In civil evidence law, res ipsa loquitur can be implemented through presumptive evidence concluded by the judge. Meanwhile, in Islamic law, there are dalil (instructions) for qarinah, which are equated with presumptive evidence, so that res ipsa loquitur, which can be enforced through presumptive evidence, can also be enforced through qarinah evidence.Downloads
References
Anastasiya, R. (2017). Qarinah Sebagai Salah Satu Alat Bukti (Perspektif Fuqoha Mazhab). Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Aristya, S. D. F. (2011). Pembuktian Perdata Dalam Kasus Malpraktik Di Yogyakarta. Mimbar Hukum, 180–205.
Asgar, M. A., & Putri, B. (2021). Analisis Kasus Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Tenaga Kesehatan dan Tenaga Medis.
Azhar, H. (2020). Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Al- ’Adalah Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 163–183.
Bal, B. S., & Brenner, L. H. (2015). Medicolegal Sidebar: The Law and Social Values: Res Ipsa Loquitur. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4040-9
Black, B. C. (1979). Black Law's Dictionary, fifth edition.
Cheluvappa, R., & Selvendran, S. (2020). Medical negligence - Key cases and application of legislation. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 57(May), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.017
Dewata, M. F. N., & Yulianto, A. (2007). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Ygyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Fuady, M. (2005). Sumpah Hippocrates (Aspek Hukum Malpraktek Dokter) (Cetakan Pe). Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Guwandi, J. (1993). Tindakan Medik dan Tanggungjawab Produk Medik (Cetakan Pe). Jakarta: Balai Penerbit Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia.
Guwandi, J. (2007). Hukum Medik (Medical Law) (Cetakan Ke). Jakarta: Balai Penerbit Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia.
Ibitoye, T. R. (2018). Applicability of The Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Medical Negligence in Nigeria. NAUJILJ, 9(November 2017), 167–178.
Izomiddin. (2018). Pemikiran dan Filsafat Hukum Islam. Jakarta: PrenadaMedia.
Kahn, J. H., & Lopatka, J. E. (n.d.). Res Ipsa Loquitur: Reducing Confusion or Creating Bias? Kentucky Law Journal, 108, 239–299.
Mahkamah Agung RI. Putusan Pengadilan 281/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Bdg.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.
Masinambow, E. (2016). Kedudukan Doktrin Res Ipsa Loquitur Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perdata Dalam Kasus Malpraktik. Lex Et Societatis, 4(5), 88–96.
Miharja, J. (2016). Konsep Ganti Rugi Perspektif Hukum Islam. Mu’amalat: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 8(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.20414/mu.v8i2.1997
Mokhtar, M. F. M. (2022). Medical Negligence Dispute in Malaysia: Choosing Mediation as the Best Constructive Approach to Address the Paradoxes in Medical Negligence Claims. European Journal of Natural Sciences and Medicine, 5(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejis.v4i2.p202-211
Momuat, O. (2014). Alat Bukti Tulisan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Lex Privatum, Vol.II/No.1/Jan-Mar/2014, II(8), 137.
Murdi, Patri Bayu, Novianto, W. T., & Purwadi, H. (2018). Penerapan Doktrin Res Ipsa Loquitur Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Malpraktek Medik. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 6(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17758
Murdi, Patria Bayu, Supanto, & Novianto, W. T. (2020). The Application of the IPSA Loquitur Principle in the Regulation of Medical Malpractice Resolution. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(12), 756–764.
Nuriskandar, L. H. (2021). Perbandingan Metode Pembuktian secara Qarinah di Terengganu (Malaysia) dan Aceh (Indonesia). Darusalam: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perbandingan Hukum, 1(2), 1–15.
Prayitno, W. (2020). Application of Res Ipsa Loquitur to the Medical Negligence Case in Patient Protection Perspective. ICLEH 202, 140(ICLEH), pp. 292–305. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.059
Rayamane, A. P., & Chandrahekar, T. N. (2015). Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur- Application in Medical Negligence Cases. Journal of South India Medicolegal Association, 7(1), 15–19.
Saenah, S. (2017). Jenis-Jenis Alat Bukti: Studi Perbandingan Antara Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurista, 6(1), 68–83.
Saepullah, A. (2016). Memutuskan Perkara Berdasarkan Qarīnah Menurut Hukum Islam. Mahkamah : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 1(1).
Shenoy, A., Shenoy, G. N., & Shenoy, G. . (2022). Res Ipsa Loquitur: An insight into the novel Seven 'I is of Indicative Treatment - A potential defence for the defendant Doctor. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100751
Sibarani, S., & Sinamo, N. (2020). Medical Malpractice in the Legal View. TICASH 2019, 439(Ticash, 2019), 28–34. Jakarta: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200515.006
Susila, M. E. (2007). Penerapan Asas Rep Ipsa Loquitur Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Malpraktik Medik Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta.
Sylvana, Y., & Widjaja, G. (2022). Penerapan Res Ipsa Loquitor Dalam Malpraktik Di Rumah Sakit. Cross Border, 5(1), 514–535.
Wisely, C. (2022). Kaki Kiri Sakit tapi yang Dioperasi Kanan, Bidan Polisikan Dokter di Sumut.
WV Putri. (2008). Tanggung Jawab Perdata Dokter Dalam Transaksi Teraputik Pada Perkara Gugatan Malpraktik Dokter Rumah Sakit Puri Cinere. Purwokerto.
Yudhatama, L. A. (2017). Analisis Keterangan ahli Dalam Persidangan Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 windy virdinia putri, Muchammad Ichsan, Nanik Prasetyoningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
