Efficiency of Justice Collaborator Witnesses with Crown Witnesses in Revealing  Corruption Criminal Cases

m-adi setiawan; Yeni Widowati

Authors

m-adi setiawan Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta
Yeni Widowati Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta

Abstract

This research aims to determine the justice collaborator and crown witnesses' efficiency in uncovering criminal corruption cases. Furthermore, this article uses normative methods, library data sources, and relevant regulatory legal documents. The findings in this research are that using crown witnesses in the judicial process is common, but this condition does not mean that the public prosecutor can present crown witnesses in court. The use of crown witnesses with a mechanism (splitting) in the evidentiary process in court is contrary to the principle of non-self-discrimination, which is implicitly partially reflected in several articles, namely Article 66 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which states that there is no burden of proof for the defendant (the burden of proof is the responsibility of the public prosecutor). Crown witnesses are also an essential tool in fighting organized crime in cases of criminal acts of corruption. As an insider who is part of the environment where the information he leaked, he understands very well what and how the crime method is, which has been neatly wrapped up and kept secret from the public and law enforcement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad, F. F., & Taun, T. (2022). Peran Justice Collaborator dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4, 2556–2560.

Afif, M., Pengadilan, H., Usaha, T., Pekanbaru, N., Dosen, D., Tinggi, S., Ekonomi, I., & Indonesia, P. (2018). Eksistensi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 1(1). http://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org

Ali Asgar, M., Nurjaya, I. N., Sugiri, B., & Anshari, T. (2021). Legal protection justice collaborators in the corruption justice system. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(6), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i6.1340

Amin, R. (2017). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Narkotika Sebagai Justice Collaborator (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Ri Nomor: 920K/PID.SUS/2013). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 1(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v1n2.16

Bunga, M., Dg Maroa, M., Arief, A., & Djanggih, H. (2020). Urgensi Peran Serta Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Cahyono, J., Suryokumoro, H., Aprilianda, N., & Noerdajasakti, S. (2023). Management of Economic Problems in Indonesia Through the Eradication of Crime of Corruption by Implementing the Justice Collaborator System (pp. 194–202). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-214-9_21

Chandra, T. Y., & Sriwidodo, J. (2023). Determining A Justice Collaborator’s Status Of Corruption: Disparities Consideration Of Indonesian Law Enforcement. Number, 25(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v25i1.28659

Diyan Pratama, B. (2023). Analisis Kebijakan Kedudukan Justice Collaborator Dan Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(1), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.183

Fakultas, I., Universitas, H., Mangkurat, L., Brigjend, J., Hasan Basry, H., & Banjarmasin, K. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa. 3.

Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2019). Ana Fauzia dan Fathul Hamdani Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi Melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Legal Reform For Handling Corruption By Corporations Through The Illicit Enrichment Arrangements In The National Law System. https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/

Gunawan, Y., & Karawang, U. S. (2019). Peran Dan Perlindungan Whistleblower (Para Pengungkap Fakta) Dalam Rangka Memberantas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. In Law Review: Vol. XVIII (Issue 3).

Hudiarini, S., Hadiwinata, K., Chalim, A., & Muslim, S. (2020). Legal Protection Of Whistleblowers and Justice Collaborator Against Corruption In Indonesia.

Hutahaean, A., & Indarti, E. (2018). Lembaga Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia.

Lintang, K., & Nugroho, S. (2022a). Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case (Vol. 17, Issue 1).

Lintang, K., & Nugroho, S. (2022b). Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case (Vol. 17, Issue 1).

Marfuatun, L. (2018). Aborsi Dalam Perspektif Medis Dan Yuridis. Jurnal Kebidanan Dan Kesehatan, 5(1), 6–10.

Mulyadi, L. (2014). Menggagas Konsep Dan Model Ideal Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Dan Justice Colaborator Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organizer Crime Di Indonesia Masa Mendatang. Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(101–116), 101–116.

Muzaki, A. (2023). The Justice Collaborator Legal Protection in Cases of Corruption Crimes (Vol. 2, Issue 1).

Pratama, K. R., & Apriani, R. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Justice Collaborator Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Pensiun PT. Pertamina. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(6), 3079.

Purnamawati, N., Karim, M. S., Pattitingi, F., & Heryani, W. (2022). The Ideal Form of Justice Collaborator’s Role. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 49(4), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.49.4.23

Rahman, H., Purwastuty, L., & Rakhmawati, D. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Mahkota dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana. PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal, 1, 2020.

Rotua, H. S., Tomi, H. P., Nanci, Y. S., & Ria, S. D. (2021). Kedudukan Justice Colaborator Terhadap Pengungkapan Kasus Tindak Korupsi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Rectum, 3(243–255).

Rumapea, E., Siregar, G. T., & Yosepin Simbolon, N. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Martinus Laia 2). 31–42. https://doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v6i1.4244

Sholecha, E. M., Saiful, A., Yunika, S., Hariyanto, & Unsil, N. (2023). Justice Collaborator's Position and Function on Witness Protection's Rights as a Suspect from Indonesia's Perspective of Criminal Law. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7246

Siregar, F. R., & Sitorus, N. T. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Vonis Nihil Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 9(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v9i2.7076

Sugiri, B., Aprilianda, N., & Hartadi, H. (2021). The Position of Convict as Justice Collaborator in Revealing Organized Crime. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v8n2.a5

Sunday. (2021). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Optik Hukum Pidana.

Tarmudi, T., & Malinim, O. S. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum Justice Collaborator pada Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 1273/Pid. Sus/2019/PN. Plg. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 12(04), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.47709/jhb.v12i04.2750

Widowaty, Y., Purwanto, H., Savitri, N., & Setiawan, A. (2023). Reconstruction of Legal Protection of Justice Collaborators in Narcotic Criminal Cases. E3S Web of Conferences, 440. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344004017